Decades of research from across the globe highlight unequal and unfair division of household labor as a key factor that leads to relationship distress and demise. But does it have to? Testing a priori predictions across three samples of individuals cohabiting with a romantic partner during the COVID-19 pandemic (N = 2,193, including 476 couples), we found an important exception to this rule. People who reported doing more of the household labor and who perceived the division as more unfair were less satisfied across the early weeks and ensuing months of the pandemic, but these negative effects disappeared when people felt appreciated by their partners. Feeling appreciated also appeared to buffer against the negative effects of doing less, suggesting that feeling appreciated may offset the relational costs of unequal division of labor, regardless of who contributes more. These findings generalized across gender, employment status, age, socioeconomic status, and relationship length.
AdamsJ. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267–299). Academic Press.
3.
AlgoeS. B. (2012). Find, remind, and bind: The functions of gratitude in everyday relationships. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(6), 455–469.
4.
AmaroL. M. (2017). Dyadic effects of gratitude on burden, conflict, and contribution in the family caregiver and sibling relationship. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 45(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2016.1248464
5.
ArmentaC. N.FritzM. M.WalshL. C.LyubomirskyS. (2022). Satisfied yet striving: Gratitude fosters life satisfaction and improvement motivation in youth. Emotion, 22(5), 1004–1016. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000896
6.
BakerL. R.McNultyJ. K.VanderDriftL. E. (2017). Expectations for future relationship satisfaction: Unique sources and critical implications for commitment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(5), 700–721. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000299
7.
BartonA. W.FutrisT. G.NielsenR. B. (2015). Linking financial distress to marital quality: The intermediary roles of demand/withdraw and spousal gratitude expressions. Personal Relationships, 22(3), 536–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12094
8.
BergerA. R.Janoff-BulmanR. (2006). Costs and satisfaction in close relationships: The role of loss-gain framing. Personal Relationships, 13(1), 53–68.
9.
BlairS. L.JohnsonM. P. (1992). Wives’ perceptions of the fairness of the division of household labor: The intersection of housework and ideology. Journal of Marriage and Family, 54(3), 570–581. https://doi.org/10.2307/353243
10.
CraigL.ChurchillB. (2021). Dual-earner parent couples’ work and care during COVID-19. Gender, Work & Organization, 28(Suppl. 1), 66–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12497
11.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
12.
GordonA. M.ImpettE. A.KoganA.OveisC.KeltnerD. (2012). To have and to hold: Gratitude promotes relationship maintenance in intimate bonds. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(2), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028723
13.
HawkinsA. J.MarshallC. M.MeinersK. M. (1995). Exploring wives’ sense of fairness about family work: An initial test of the distributive justice framework. Journal of Family Issues, 16(6), 693–721. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251395016006002
14.
Holt-LunstadJ.SmithT. B.LaytonJ. B. (2010). Social relationships and mortality risk: A meta-analytic review. PLOS Medicine, 7(7), Article e1000316. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000316
15.
JacksonG. L.TrailT. E.KennedyD. P.WilliamsonH. C.BradburyT. N.KarneyB. R. (2016). The salience and severity of relationship problems among low-income couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 30(1), 2–11. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000158
16.
KanskyJ. (2018). What’s love got to do with it? Romantic relationships and well-being. In DienerE.OishiS.TayL. (Eds.), Handbook of well-being. DEF Publishers.
17.
KlumbP.HoppmannC.StaatsM. (2006). Division of labor in German dual-earner families: Testing equity theoretical hypotheses. Journal of Marriage and Family, 68(4), 870–882. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2006.00301.x
18.
KroenkeK.SpitzerR. L.WilliamsJ. B.LöweB. (2009). An ultra-brief screening scale for anxiety and depression: The PHQ–4. Psychosomatics, 50(6), 613–621.
19.
LaveeY.KatzR. (2002). Division of labor, perceived fairness, and marital quality: The effect of gender ideology. Journal of Marriage and Family, 64(1), 27–39.
20.
MikulaG.SchoebiD.JagoditschS.MacherS. (2009). Roots and correlates of perceived injustice in the division of family work. Personal Relationships, 16(4), 553–574. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2009.01239.x
21.
ParkY.ImpettE. A.MacDonaldG.LemayE. P.Jr. (2019). Saying “thank you”: Partners’ expressions of gratitude protect relationship satisfaction and commitment from the harmful effects of attachment insecurity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(4), 773–806. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000178
PollmannM. M. H.FinkenauerC. (2009). Investigating the role of two types of understanding in relationship well-being: Understanding is more important than knowledge. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(11), 1512–1527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209342754
24.
PressJ. E.TownsleyE. (1998). Wives’ and husbands’ housework reporting: Gender, class, and social desirability. Gender & Society, 12(2), 188–218.
25.
QianY.SayerL. C. (2016). Division of labor, gender ideology, and marital satisfaction in East Asia. Journal of Marriage and Family, 78(2), 383–400.
26.
ReisH. T.LeeK. Y.O’KeefeS. D.ClarkM. S. (2018). Perceived partner responsiveness promotes intellectual humility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.05.006
27.
RStudio Team. (2021). RStudio: Integrated development for R (Version 1.4) [Computer software]. http://www.rstudio.com/
28.
RusbultC. E.MartzJ. M.AgnewC. R. (1998). The Investment Model Scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size. Personal Relationships, 5(4), 357–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1998.tb00177.x
ShaferK.ScheiblingC.MilkieM. A. (2020). The division of domestic labor before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada: Stagnation versus shifts in fathers’ contributions. Canadian Review of Sociology, 57(4), 523–549. https://doi.org/10.1111/cars.12315
31.
ShockleyK. M.ClarkM. A.DoddH.KingE. B. (2021). Work-family strategies during COVID-19: Examining gender dynamics among dual-earner couples with young children. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000857
32.
ShockleyK. M.ShenW. (2016). Couple dynamics: Division of labor. In AllenT. D.EbyL. T. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of work and family (Chapter 30). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199337538.013.10
33.
ter KuileH.KluwerE.FinkenauerC.van der LippeT. (2017). Predicting adaptation to parenthood: The role of responsiveness, gratitude, and trust. Personal Relationships, 24(3), 663–682. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12202
34.
ThielemansG.FallesenP.MortelmansD. (2021). Division of household labor and relationship dissolution in Denmark 2001–2009. Journal of Family Issues, 42(7), 1582–1606. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X20949890
35.
van EldikW. M.de HaanA. D.ParryL. Q.DaviesP. T.LuijkM. P. C. M.ArendsL. R.PrinzieP. (2020). The interparental relationship: Meta-analytic associations with children’s maladjustment and responses to interparental conflict. Psychological Bulletin, 146(7), 553–594. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000233
36.
Van WilligenM.DrenteaP. (2001). Benefits of equitable relationships: The impact of sense of fairness, household division of labor, and decision making power on perceived social support. Sex Roles, 44(9), 571–597.
37.
Van YperenN. W.BuunkB. P. (1990). A longitudinal study of equity and satisfaction in intimate relationships. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20(4), 287–309. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420200403
38.
WaddellN.OverallN. C.ChangV. T.HammondM. D. (2021). Gendered division of labor during a nationwide COVID-19 lockdown: Implications for relationship problems and satisfaction. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(6), 1759–1781. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407521996476
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
