False accusations of wrongdoing are common and can have grave consequences. In six studies, we document a worrisome paradox in perceivers’ subjective judgments of a suspect’s guilt. Specifically, we found that people (including online panelists, n = 4,983, and working professionals such as fraud investigators and auditors, n = 136) use suspects’ angry responses to accusations as cues of guilt. However, we found that such anger is an invalid cue of guilt and is instead a valid cue of innocence; accused individuals (university students, n = 230) and online panelists (n = 401) were angrier when they are falsely relative to accurately accused. Moreover, we found that individuals who remain silent are perceived to be at least as guilty as those who angrily deny an accusation.
AverillJ. R. (1983). Studies on anger and aggression. Implications for theories of emotion. The American Psychologist, 38(11), 1145–1160. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.38.11.1145
2.
BatsonC. D.KennedyC. L.NordL.-A.StocksE. L.FlemingD. A.MarzetteC. M.LishnerD. A.HayesR. E.KolchinskyL. M.ZergerT. (2007). Anger at unfairness: Is it moral outrage?European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1272–1285. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.434
BrunswikE. (1952). The conceptual framework of psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 49(6), 654–656.
6.
CôtéS.HidegI.van KleefG. A. (2013). The consequences of faking anger in negotiations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(3), 453–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.12.015
DePauloB. M.MorrisW. L. (2004). Discerning lies from truths: Behavioural cues to deception and the indirect pathway of intuition. In GranhagP. A.StrömwallL. A. (Eds.), The detection of deception in forensic contexts (pp. 15–40). Cambridge University Press.
DunnJ. R.SchweitzerM. E. (2005). Feeling and believing: The influence of emotion on trust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(5), 736–748. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.736
11.
EkmanP. (2001). Telling lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics, and marriage. W. W. Norton.
EndersC. K.TofighiD. (2007). Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue. Psychological Methods, 12(2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121
14.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J. C.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
15.
FrijdaN. H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge University Press.
16.
Harmon-JonesE.SigelmanJ. (2001). State anger and prefrontal brain activity: Evidence that insult-related relative left-prefrontal activation is associated with experienced anger and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(5), 797–803. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.5.797
17.
HigginsE. T.RholesW. S.JonesC. R. (1977). Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(2), 141–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(77)80007-3
18.
The jamovi project. (2020). jamovi (Version 1.2) [Computer software]. https://www.jamovi.org
19.
JohnL. K.BaraszK.NortonM. I. (2016). Hiding personal information reveals the worst. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 113(4), 954–959. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1516868113
20.
KrautR. E.PoeD. B. (1980). Behavioral roots of person perception: The deception judgments of customs inspectors and laymen. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 784–798. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.784
PetersonJ. L.RyanJ. P.HouldenP. J.MihajlovicS. (1987). The uses and effects of forensic science in the adjudication of felony cases. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 32(6), 1730–1753. https://doi.org/10.1520/jfs11231j
23.
PorterS.ten BrinkeL. (2009). Dangerous decisions: A theoretical framework for understanding how judges assess credibility in the courtroom. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 14(1), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532508X281520
SimmonsJ. (2014, April4). MTurk vs. the lab: Either way we need big samples. Data Colada. http://datacolada.org/18
26.
SmithC. A.HaynesK. N.LazarusR. S.PopeL. K. (1993). In search of the “hot” cognitions: Attributions, appraisals, and their relation to emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(5), 916–929. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.5.916
27.
ten BrinkeL.VohsK. D.CarneyD. R. (2016). Can ordinary people detect deception after all?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(8), 579–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.05.012
28.
van DoornE. A.HeerdinkM. W.van KleefG. A. (2012). Emotion and the construal of social situations: Inferences of cooperation versus competition from expressions of anger, happiness, and disappointment. Cognition and Emotion, 26(3), 442–461. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2011.648174
29.
van KleefG. A. (2009). How emotions regulate social life: The emotions as social information (EASI) model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(3), 184–188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01633.x
VrijA. (2008). Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities. John Wiley & Sons.
32.
VrijA.GranhagP. A. (2007). Interviewing to detect deception. In ChristiansonS. A. (Ed.), Offenders’ memories of violent crimes (pp. 279–304). John Wiley & Sons.
33.
WatsonD.ClarkL. A. (1994). The PANAS-X: Manual for the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule - expanded form. The University of Iowa.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
