Global Variation in Subjective Well-Being Predicts Seven Forms of Altruism

Abstract

The geographic prevalence of various altruistic behaviors (nonreciprocal acts that improve other people’s welfare) is not uniformly distributed, but whether this reflects variation in a superordinate construct linked to national-level outcomes or cultural values is unknown. We compiled data on seven altruistic behaviors across 48 to 152 nations and found evidence that these behaviors reflect a latent construct positively associated with national-level subjective well-being (SWB) and individualist values, even when we controlled for national-level wealth, health, education, and shared cultural history. Consistent with prior work, our results showed that SWB mediated the relationship between two objective measures of well-being (wealth and health) and altruism (n = 130). Moreover, these indirect effects increased as individualist values increased within the subset of countries (n = 90) with available data. Together, our results indicate that altruism increases when resources and cultural values provide objective and subjective means for pursuing personally meaningful goals and that altruistic behaviors may be enhanced by societal changes that promote well-being.

Keywords

altruism prosocial behavior subjective well-being individualism open data open materials

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aknin

L. B.

Broesch

Kiley Hamlin

Van De Vondervoort

J. W.

(2015). Prosocial behavior leads to happiness in a small-scale rural society. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(4), 788–795. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000082

Aknin

L. B.

Dunn

E. W.

Norton

M. I.

(2012). Happiness runs in a circular motion: Evidence for a positive feedback loop between prosocial spending and happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(2), 347–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-011-9267-5

Aknin

L. B.

Van de Vondervoort

J. W.

Hamlin

J. K.

(2018). Positive feelings reward and promote prosocial behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology, 20, 55–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.08.017

Aknin

L. B.

Whillans

A. V.

Norton

M. I.

Dunn

E. W.

(2019). Happiness and prosocial behavior: An evaluation of the evidence. In Helliwell

J. F.

Layard

Sachs

J. D.

(Eds.), World happiness report 2019 (pp. 67–85). https://worldhappiness.report/ed/2019/happiness-and-prosocial-behavior-an-evaluation-of-the-evidence/

Bach

R. A.

Defever

A. M.

Chopik

W. J.

Konrath

S. H.

(2017). Geographic variation in empathy: A state-level analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 68, 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.12.007

Brethel-Haurwitz

K. M.

Marsh

A. A.

(2014). Geographical differences in subjective well-being predict extraordinary altruism. Psychological Science, 25(3), 762–771. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613516148

Buchan

N. R.

Grimalda

Wilson

Brewer

Fatas

Foddy

(2009). Globalization and human cooperation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106(11), 4138–4142.

Central Intelligence Agency. (2017). The World Factbook. https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/about/archives

Charities Aid Foundation. (2017). CAF World Giving Index 2017. https://www.cafonline.org/docs/default-source/about-us-publications/cafworldgivingindex2017_2167a_web_210917.pdf

10.

Curry

O. S.

Rowland

L. A.

Van Lissa

C. J.

Zlotowitz

McAlaney

Whitehouse

(2018). Happy to help? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of performing acts of kindness on the well-being of the actor. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 320–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.02.014

11.

Diener

(1995). Factors predicting the subjective well-being of nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 851–864. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.851

12.

Diener

Harter

Arora

(2010). Wealth and happiness across the world: Material prosperity predicts life evaluation, whereas psychosocial prosperity predicts positive feeling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018066

13.

Diener

Seligman

M. E. P.

(2018). Beyond money: Progress on an economy of well-being. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 171–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616689467

14.

Diener

Tay

(2015). Subjective well-being and human welfare around the world as reflected in the Gallup World Poll. International Journal of Psychology, 50(2), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12136

15.

Donation & Transplantation Institute. (2017). International Registry in Organ Donation and Transplantation: Final numbers 2016. https://www.irodat.org/img/database/pdf/IRODaT%20newletter%20Final%202016.pdf

16.

Dunn

E. W.

Aknin

L. B.

Norton

M. I.

(2008). Spending money on others promotes happiness. Science, 319(5870), 1687–1688. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1150952

17.

Enelamah

Thanh

(2019). Dimensions of altruism behaviors among Americans in the General Social Survey. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 30(2), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2019.1673274

18.

Fearon

J. D.

(2003). Ethnic and cultural diversity by country. Journal of Economic Growth, 8(2), 195–222. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024419522867

19.

Gallup. (2010). Gallup global wellbeing: The behavioral economics of GDP growth. https://news.gallup.com/poll/126965/gallup-global-wellbeing.aspx

20.

Gittell

Tebaldi

(2006). Charitable giving: Factors influencing giving in U.S. states. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(4), 721–736. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764006289768

21.

Helliwell

J. F.

Huang

Wang

(2019). Changing world happiness. In Helliwell

J. F.

Layard

Sachs

J. D.

(Eds.), World happiness report 2019 (pp. 11–45). https://worldhappiness.report/ed/2019/changing-world-happiness/

22.

Hofstede

G. J.

Minkov

(2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

23.

Hughes

Luksetich

(2008). Income volatility and wealth: The effect on charitable giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 37(2), 264–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764007310416

24.

Jayawickreme

Forgeard

M. J. C.

Seligman

M. E. P.

(2012). The engine of well-being. Review of General Psychology, 16(4), 327–342. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027990

25.

Jebb

A. T.

Morrison

Tay

Diener

(2020). Subjective well-being around the world: Trends and predictors across the life span. Psychological Science, 31(3), 293–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619898826

26.

Jenkinson

C. E.

Dickens

A. P.

Jones

Thompson-Coon

Taylor

R. S.

Rogers

Bambra

C. L.

Lang

Richards

S. H.

(2013). Is volunteering a public health intervention? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the health and survival of volunteers. BMC Public Health, 13(1), Article 773. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-773

27.

Kahneman

Deaton

(2010). High income improves evaluation of life but not emotional well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 107(38), 16489–16493. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1011492107

28.

Kahneman

Diener

Schwarz

(Eds.) (1999). Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. Russell Sage Foundation.

29.

Korndörfer

Egloff

Schmukle

S. C.

(2015). A large scale test of the effect of social class on prosocial behavior. PLOS ONE, 10(7), Article e0133193. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133193

30.

Kumar

Calvo

Avendano

Sivaramakrishnan

Berkman

L. F.

(2012). Social support, volunteering and health around the world: Cross-national evidence from 139 countries. Social Science & Medicine, 74(5), 696–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.11.017

31.

Layous

Nelson

S. K.

Kurtz

J. L.

Lyubomirsky

(2017). What triggers prosocial effort? A positive feedback loop between positive activities, kindness, and well-being. Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(4), 385–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1198924

32.

Marsh

A. A.

Stoycos

S. A.

Brethel-Haurwitz

K. M.

Robinson

VanMeter

J. W.

Cardinale

E. M.

(2014). Neural and cognitive characteristics of extraordinary altruists. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 111(42), 15036–15041. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1408440111

33.

Oswald

A. J.

(2010). Objective confirmation of subjective measures of human well-being: Evidence from the U.S.A. Science, 327(5965), 576–579. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180606

34.

Piff

P. K.

Kraus

M. W.

Côté

Cheng

B. H.

Keltner

(2010). Having less, giving more: The influence of social class on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(5), 771–784. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020092

35.

Post

S. G.

(2005). Altruism, happiness, and health: It’s good to be good. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 12(2), 66–77.

36.

Ruck

D. J.

Bentley

R. A.

Lawson

D. J.

(2018). Religious change preceded economic change in the 20th century. Science Advances, 4(7), Article eaar8680. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aar8680

37.

Santos

H. C.

Varnum

M. E. W.

Grossmann

(2017). Global increases in individualism. Psychological Science, 28(9), 1228–1239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617700622

38.

Schulz

J. F.

Bahrami-Rad

Beauchamp

J. P.

Henrich

(2019). The Church, intensive kinship, and global psychological variation. Science, 366(6466), Article eaau5141. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau5141

39.

Slovic

Västfjäll

Erlandsson

Gregory

(2017). Iconic photographs and the ebb and flow of empathic response to humanitarian disasters. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 114(4), 640–644. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1613977114

40.

Smith

S. W.

Lapinski

M. K.

Bresnahan

M. J.

Smith

S. L.

(2013). Conceptual aspects of altruism in cross-cultural contexts. In Vakoch

D. A.

(Ed.), Altruism in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 17–29). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6952-0_2

41.

Stamos

Lange

Huang

S.-C.

Dewitte

(2020). Having less, giving more? Two preregistered replications of the relationship between social class and prosocial behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 84, Article 103902. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JRP.2019.103902

42.

Steel

Taras

Uggerslev

Bosco

(2018). The happy culture: A theoretical, meta-analytic, and empirical review of the relationship between culture and wealth and subjective well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22(2), 128–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868317721372

43.

Thoits

P. A.

Hewitt

L. N.

(2001). Volunteer work and well-being. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 42(2), 115–131.

44.

Triandis

H. C.

(1995). Individualism & collectivism. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429499845

45.

United Nations. (2015, October 21). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development (General Assembly Doc. A/RES/70/1). https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E

46.

Weinstein

Ryan

R. M.

(2010). When helping helps: Autonomous motivation for prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 222–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016984

47.

World Animal Protection. (2014). Animal protection index. https://api.worldanimalprotection.org/

48.

The World Bank. (2017a). GDP growth (annual %). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG

49.

The World Bank. (2017b). GINI index. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/si.pov.gini

50.

The World Bank. (2017c). Literacy rate, adult total (% of people ages 15 and above). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.ADT.LITR.ZS

51.

World Health Organization. (2017). Global status report on blood safety and availability 2016. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/254987/9789241565431-eng.pdf?sequence=1

52.

World Marrow Donor Association. (2018). Total Number of Donors and Cord Blood Units. https://statistics.wmda.info/

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

6.82 MB

0.03 MB