Pitfalls of Using Data Portals as Sources for Psychological Research: The Example of Cross-National Homicide Data

Andersson C. Kazemian L. (2018). Reliability and validity of cross-national homicide data: A comparison of UN and WHO data. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 42(4), 287–302.

Atkinson A. B. Brandolini A. (2001). Promise and pitfalls in the use of “secondary” data-sets: Income inequality in OECD countries as a case study. Journal of Economic Literature, 39(3), 771–799.

Kanis S. Messner S. F. Eisner M. P. Heitmeyer W. (2017). A cautionary note about the use of estimated homicide data for cross-national research. Homicide Studies, 21(4), 312–324.

Mathers C. D. (2020). History of global burden of disease assessment at the World Health Organization. Archives of Public Health, 78, Article 77. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-020-00458-3

Nivette A. E. (2011). Cross-national predictors of crime: A meta-analysis. Homicide Studies, 15(2), 103–131.

Nivette A. E. (2012). Spatial patterns of homicide and political legitimacy in Europe. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 36(3), 155–171.

Trent C. L. S. Pridemore W. A. (2012). A review of the cross-national empirical literature on social structure and homicide. In Liem M. C. A. Pridemore W. A. (Eds.), Handbook of European homicide research: Patterns, explanations, and country studies (pp. 111–135). Springer Science+Business Media.

United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2011). 2011 Global study on homicide. http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/data-and-analysis/statistics/crime/global-study-on-homicide-2011.html

World Health Organization. (2014). Global status report on violence prevention 2014. https://www.who.int/violence_injury_prevention/violence/status_report/2014/en/