Where do our political attitudes originate? Although early research attributed the formation of such beliefs to parent and peer socialization, genetically sensitive designs later clarified the substantial role of genes in the development of sociopolitical attitudes. However, it has remained unclear whether parental influence on offspring attitudes persists beyond adolescence. In a unique sample of 394 adoptive and biological families with offspring more than 30 years old, biometric modeling revealed significant evidence for genetic and nongenetic transmission from both parents for the majority of seven political-attitude phenotypes. We found the largest genetic effects for religiousness and social liberalism, whereas the largest influence of parental environment was seen for political orientation and egalitarianism. Together, these findings indicate that genes, environment, and the gene–environment correlation all contribute significantly to sociopolitical attitudes held in adulthood, and the etiology and development of those attitudes may be more important than ever in today’s rapidly changing sociopolitical landscape.
AbrahamsonA. C.BakerL. A.CaspiA. (2002). Rebellious teens? Genetic and environmental influences on the social attitudes of adolescents. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1392–1408.
2.
AlfordJ. R.FunkC. L.HibbingJ. R. (2005). Are political orientations genetically transmitted?American Political Science Review, 99(2), 1392–1408.
3.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.
4.
BarrettM. (2007). Children’s knowledge, beliefs and feelings about nations and national groups. Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis.
5.
BeckwithJ.MorrisC. A. (2008). Twin studies of political behavior: Untenable assumptions?Perspectives on Politics, 6(4), 785–791.
6.
BergenS. E.GardnerC. O.KendlerK. S. (2007). Age-related changes in heritability of behavioral phenotypes over adolescence and young adulthood: A meta-analysis. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 10(3), 423–433.
7.
CondonD. M.RevelleW. (2014). The International Cognitive Ability Resource: Development and initial validation of a public-domain measure. Intelligence, 43(1), 52–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.01.004
8.
DegnerJ.DalegeJ. (2013). The apple does not fall far from the tree, or does it? A meta-analysis of parent-child similarity in intergroup attitudes. Psychological Bulletin, 139(6), 1270–1304.
9.
DuckittJ.BizumicB.KraussS. W.HeledE. (2010). A tripartite approach to right-wing authoritarianism: The authoritarianism-conservatism-traditionalism model. Political Psychology, 31(5), 685–715.
10.
EavesL. J.EysenckH. J. (1974). Genetics and the development of social attitudes. Nature, 249, 288–289.
11.
EavesL.HeathA.MartinN.MaesH.NealeM.KendlerK.KirkK.CoreyL. (1999). Comparing the biological and cultural inheritance of personality and social attitudes in the Virginia 30 000 study of twins and their relatives. Twin Research, 2(2), 62–80. https://doi.org/10.1375/twin.2.2.62
12.
EavesL. J.MartinN.HeathA.SchiekenR.MeyerJ.SilbergJ.NealeM.CoreyL. (1997). Age changes in the causes of individual differences in conservatism. Behavior Genetics, 27(2), 121–124.
13.
FedericoC. M. (in press). The personality basis of political preferences. In OsborneD.SibleyC. G. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of political psychology. Cambridge University Press.
14.
FeldmanS. (1988). Structure and consistency in public opinion: The role of core beliefs and values. American Journal of Political Science, 32(2), 416–440.
15.
FeldmanS.SteenbergenM. R. (2001). The humanitarian foundation of public support for social welfare. American Journal of Political Science, 45(3), 658–677.
16.
FunkC. L.SmithK. B.AlfordJ. R.HibbingM. V.EatonN. R.KruegerR. F.EavesL. J.HibbingJ. R. (2013). Genetic and environmental transmission of political orientations. Political Psychology, 34(6), 805–819. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00915.x
17.
HatemiP. K.HibbingJ. R.MedlandS. E.KellerM. C.AlfordJ. R.SmithK. B.MartinN. G.EavesL. J. (2010). Not by twins alone: Using the extended family design to investigate genetic influence on political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 54(3), 798–814.
18.
HuL.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.
19.
HuferA.KornadtA. E.KandlerC.RiemannR. (2020). Genetic and environmental variation in political orientation in adolescence and early adulthood: A nuclear twin family analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(4), 762–776.
20.
JenningsM. K.StokerL.BowersJ. (2009). Politics across generations: Family transmission reexamined. The Journal of Politics, 71(3), 782–799.
21.
KandlerC.BleidornW.RiemannR. (2012). Left or right? Sources of political orientation: The roles of genetic factors, cultural transmission, assortative mating, and personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 633–645.
22.
KellerM. C.MedlandS. E.DuncanL. E.HatemiP. K.NealeM. C.MaesH. H. M.EavesL. J. (2009). Modeling extended twin family data I: Description of the cascade model. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 12(1), 8–18. https://doi.org/10.1375/twin.12.1.8
23.
KirkK. M.MaesH. H.NealeM. C.HeathA. C.MartinN. G.EavesL. J. (1999). Frequency of church attendance in Australia and the United States: Models of family resemblance. Twin Research, 2(2), 99–107.
24.
KoenigL. B.McGueM.IaconoW. G. (2009). Rearing environmental influences on religiousness: An investigation of adolescent adoptees. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(6), 652–656.
25.
MaccobyE. E.MatthewsR. E.MortonA. S. (1954). Youth and political change. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 18(1), 23–39.
26.
MalkaA.LelkesY.SotoC. J. (2017). Are cultural and economic conservatism positively correlated? A large-scale cross-national test. British Journal of Political Science, 49, 1045–1069.
27.
MartinN. D.RigoniD.VohsK. D. (2017). Free will beliefs predict attitudes toward unethical behavior and criminal punishment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 114(28), 7325–7330. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1702119114
28.
MartinN. G.EavesL. J.HeathA. C.JardineR.FeingoldL. M.EysenckH. J. (1986). Transmission of social attitudes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 83(12), 4364–4368. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.83.12.4364
29.
McCourtK.BouchardT. J.Jr.LykkenD. T.TellegenA.KeyesM. (1999). Authoritarianism revisited: Genetic and environmental influences examined in twins reared apart and together. Personality and Individual Differences, 27(5), 985–1014.
30.
McCraeR. R.MartinT. A.HrebíckováM.UrbánekT.BoomsmaD. I.WillemsenG.CostaT. J. (2008). Personality trait similarity between spouses in four cultures. Journal of Personality, 76(5), 1137–1164.
31.
McDonaldR. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Taylor & Francis.
32.
McGueM.KeyesM.SharmaA.ElkinsI.LegrandL.JohnsonW.IaconoW. G. (2007). The environments of adopted and non-adopted youth: Evidence on range restriction from the Sibling Interaction and Behavior Study (SIBS). Behavior Genetics, 37(3), 449–462.
33.
OskarssonS.CesariniD.DawesC. T.FowlerJ. H.JohannessonM.MagnussonP. K. E.TeorellJ. (2015). Linking genes and political orientations: Testing the cognitive ability as mediator hypothesis. Political Psychology, 36(6), 649–665.
34.
OskarssonS.DawesC. T.LindgrenK.-O. (2018). It runs in the family: A study of political candidacy among Swedish adoptees. Political Behavior, 40(4), 883–908.
35.
PlominR.DeFriesJ. C.KnopikV. S.NeiderhiserJ. M. (2016). Top 10 replicated findings from behavioral genetics. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 3–23.
36.
PlominR.DeFriesJ. C.LoehlinJ. C. (1977). Genotype-environment interaction and correlation in the analysis of human behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 84(2), 309–322.
37.
PoldermanT. J.BenyaminB.De LeeuwC. A.SullivanP. F.Van BochovenA.VisscherP. M.PosthumaD. (2015). Meta-analysis of the heritability of human traits based on fifty years of twin studies. Nature Genetics, 47(7), 702–709.
ScarrS. (1981). The transmission of authoritarianism in families: Genetic resemblance in social-political attitudes? In ScarrS. (Ed.), Race, social class, and individual differences in I. Q. (pp. 399–427). Erlbaum.
40.
ScarrS.WeinbergR. A. (1978). The influence of “family background” on intellectual attainment. American Sociological Review, 43(5), 674–692.
41.
SidaniusJ.MitchellM.HaleyH.NavarreteC. D. (2006). Support for harsh criminal sanctions and criminal justice beliefs: A social dominance perspective. Social Justice Research, 19(4), 433–449.
van EerdeweghP. (1982). Statistical selection in multivariate systems with applications in quantitative genetics [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Washington University in St. Louis.
44.
WeedenJ.KurzbanR. (2016). Do people naturally cluster into liberals and conservatives?Evolutionary Psychological Science, 2, 47–57.
45.
WilloughbyE. A.McGueM.IaconoW. G.LeeJ. J. (2021). Genetic and environmental contributions to IQ in adoptive and biological families with 30-year-old offspring. Intelligence, 88, Article 101579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2021.101579
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
