Rewards exert a deep influence on our cognition and behavior. Here, we used a paradigm in which reward information was provided at either encoding or retrieval of a brief, masked stimulus to show that reward can also rapidly modulate perceptual encoding of visual information. Experiment 1 (n = 30 adults) showed that participants’ response accuracy was enhanced when a to-be-encoded grating signaled high reward relative to low reward, but only when the grating was presented very briefly and participants reported that they were not consciously aware of it. Experiment 2 (n = 29 adults) showed that there was no difference in participants’ response accuracy when reward information was instead provided at the stage of retrieval, ruling out an explanation of the reward-modulation effect in terms of differences in motivated retrieval. Taken together, our findings provide behavioral evidence consistent with a rapid reward modulation of visual perception, which may not require consciousness.
AlbertellaL.WatsonP.YücelM.Le PelleyM. E. (2019). Persistence of value-modulated attentional capture is associated with risky alcohol use. Addictive Behaviors Reports, 10, Article 100195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abrep.2019.100195
2.
AndersonB. A.FaulknerM. L.RileeJ. J.YantisS.MarvelC. L. (2013). Attentional bias for nondrug reward is magnified in addiction. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 21, 499–506. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034575c
3.
AndersonB. A.LaurentP. A.YantisS. (2011). Value-driven attentional capture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 108, 10367–10371. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1104047108
4.
BaddeleyA. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255, 556–559.
5.
BelopolskyA. V. (2015). Common priority map for selection history, reward and emotion in the oculomotor system. Perception, 44, 920–933. https://doi.org/10.1177/0301006615596866
6.
BerridgeK. C.RobinsonT. E.AldridgeJ. W. (2009). Dissecting components of reward: ‘Liking’, ‘wanting’, and learning. Current Opinion in Pharmacology, 9, 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coph.2008.12.014
7.
BijleveldE.CustersR.AartsH. (2009). The unconscious eye opener: Pupil dilation reveals strategic recruitment of resources upon presentation of subliminal reward cues. Psychological Science, 20(11), 1313–1315.
8.
BourgeoisA.ChelazziL.VuilleumierP. (2016). How motivation and reward learning modulate selective attention. In StuderB.KnechtS. (Eds.), Progress in brain research: Motivation. Theory, neurobiology and applications (Vol. 229, pp. 325–342). Elsevier.
9.
CapaR. L.BouquetC. A.DreherJ. C.DufourA. (2013). Long-lasting effects of performance-contingent unconscious and conscious reward incentives during cued task-switching. Cortex, 49, 1943–1954. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.05.018
10.
CustersR.AartsH. (2010). The unconscious will: How the pursuit of goals operates outside of conscious awareness. Science, 329, 47–50. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1188595
11.
DehaeneS.ChangeuxJ.-P. (2011). Experimental and theoretical approaches to conscious processing. Neuron, 70(2), 200–227.
DonohueS. E.WoldorffM. G.HopfJ. M.HarrisJ. A.HeinzeH. J.SchoenfeldM. A. (2016). An electrophysiological dissociation of craving and stimulus-dependent attentional capture in smokers. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 16, 1114–1126. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-016-0457-9
14.
FailingM.TheeuwesJ. (2018). Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 514–538. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1380-y
15.
GottfriedJ. A.O’DohertyJ.DolanR. J. (2003). Encoding predictive reward value in human amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex. Science, 301, 1104–1107.
16.
HickeyC.ChelazziL.TheeuwesJ. (2010). Reward changes salience in human vision via the anterior cingulate. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 11096–11103. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1026-10.2010
17.
HopfJ. M.SchoenfeldM. A.BuschschulteA.RautzenbergA.KrebsR. M.BoehlerC. N. (2015). The modulatory impact of reward and attention on global feature selection in human visual cortex. Visual Cognition, 23, 229–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2015.1011252
18.
JeffreysH. (1961). The theory of probability. Oxford University Press.
19.
KaiserD.QuekG. L.CichyR. M.PeelenM. V. (2019). Object vision in a structured world. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23, 672–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.04.013
20.
KingJ.-R.PescetelliN.DehaeneS. (2016). Brain mechanisms underlying the brief maintenance of seen and unseen sensory information. Neuron, 92, 1122–1134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.10.051
21.
KleinerM.BrainardD. H.PelliD. G. (2007). What’s new in Psychtoolbox-3?Perception, 36(ECVP Abstract Suppl.).
22.
LauH.RosenthalD. (2011). Empirical support for higher-order theories of conscious awareness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 365–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.05.009
23.
Le PelleyM. E.PearsonD.GriffithsO.BeesleyT. (2015). When goals conflict with values: Counterproductive attentional and oculomotor capture by reward-related stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 158–171.
24.
Le PelleyM. E.SeabrookeT.KennedyB. L.PearsonD.MostS. B. (2017). Miss it and miss out: Counterproductive nonspatial attentional capture by task-irrelevant, value-related stimuli. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 79, 1628–1642. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-017-1346-1
25.
MaunsellJ. H. (2004). Neuronal representations of cognitive state: Reward or attention?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 261–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.04.003
26.
McFadyenJ.DolanR. J.GarridoM. I. (2020). The influence of subcortical shortcuts on disordered sensory and cognitive processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 21, 264–276. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-020-0287-1
27.
PearsonD.WatsonP.ChengP. (X.)Le PelleyM. E. (2020). Overt attentional capture by reward-related stimuli overcomes inhibitory suppression. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 46, 489–501. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000728
PessiglioneM.SchmidtL.DraganskiB.KalischR.LauH.DolanR. J.FrithC. D. (2007). How the brain translates money into force: A neuroimaging study of subliminal motivation. Science, 316(5826), 904–906.
30.
PessoaL.EngelmannJ. B. (2010). Embedding reward signals into perception and cognition. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 4, Article 17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2010.00017
ShibataK.SagiD.WatanabeT. (2014). Two-stage model in perceptual learning: Toward a unified theory. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1316, 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12419
37.
ShulerM. G.BearM. F. (2006). Reward timing in the primary visual cortex. Science, 311(5767), 1606–1609.
38.
SotoD.MäntyläT.SilvantoJ. (2011). Working memory without consciousness. Current Biology, 21, R912–R913.
39.
SotoD.SilvantoJ. (2014). Reappraising the relationship between working memory and conscious awareness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 520–525.
40.
StănişorL.van der TogtC.PennartzC. M.RoelfsemaP. R. (2013). A unified selection signal for attention and reward in primary visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 110(22), 9136–9141.
41.
TsuchiyaN.WilkeM.FrassleS.LammeV. A. F. (2015). No-report paradigms: Extracting the true neural correlates of consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19, 757–770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.10.002
42.
WagenmakersE.-J. (2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 779–804. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194105
WatsonP.PearsonD.MostS. B.TheeuwesJ.WiersR. W.Le PelleyM. E. (2019). Attentional capture by Pavlovian reward-signalling distractors in visual search persists when rewards are removed. PLOS ONE, 14, Article e0226284. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226284
45.
WatsonP.PearsonD.WiersR. W.Le PelleyM. E. (2019). Prioritizing pleasure and pain: Attentional capture by reward- and punishment-related stimuli. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 26, 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.12.002
46.
YiD. J.WoodmanG. F.WiddersD.MaroisR.ChunM. M. (2004). Neural fate of ignored stimuli: Dissociable effects of perceptual and working memory load. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 992–996. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1294
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
