Disinformation in politics, advertising, and mass communications has proliferated in recent years. Few counterargumentation strategies have proven effective at undermining a deceptive message over time. This article introduces the Poison Parasite Counter (PPC), a cognitive-science-based strategy for durably countering deceptive communications. The PPC involves inserting a strong (poisonous) counter-message, just once, into a close replica of a deceptive rival’s original communication. In parasitic fashion, the original communication then “hosts” the counter-message, which is recalled on each reexposure to the original communication. The strategy harnesses associative memory to turn the original communication into a retrieval cue for a negating counter-message. Seven experiments (N = 3,679 adults) show that the PPC lastingly undermines a duplicitous rival’s original communication, influencing judgments of communicator honesty and favorability as well as real political donations.
BenartziS.BeshearsJ.MilkmanK. L.SunsteinC. R.ThalerR. H.ShankarM.Tucker-RayW.CongdonW. J.GalingS. (2017). Should governments invest more in nudging?Psychological Science, 28(8), 1041–1055. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617702501
2.
BitterlyT. B.SchweitzerM. E. (2020). The economic and interpersonal consequences of deflecting direct questions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(5), 945–990. https://doi.org/0.1037/pspi0000200
3.
CooneyG.MastroianniA. M.Abi-EsberN.BrooksA. W. (2020). The many minds problem: Disclosure in dyadic versus group conversation. Current Opinion in Psychology, 31, 22–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.032
4.
CosmidesL.ToobyJ. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In BarkowJ. H.CosmidesL.ToobyJ. (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 163–228). Oxford University Press.
5.
DiasN.PennycookG.RandD. G. (2020, January14). Emphasizing publishers does not effectively reduce susceptibility to misinformation on social media. The Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-001
6.
EckerU. K. H.HoganJ. L.LewandowskyS. (2017). Reminders and repetition of misinformation: Helping or hindering its retraction?Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(2), 185–192.
FarrellyM. C.DavisK. C.HavilandM. L.MesseriP.HealtonC. G. (2005). Evidence of a dose-response relationship between “truth” antismoking ads and youth smoking prevalence. American Journal of Public Health, 95(3), 425–431. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2004.049692
9.
FazioL. K.SherryC. L. (2020). The effect of repetition on truth judgments across development. Psychological Science, 31(9), 1150–1160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620939534
GerberA. (1998). Estimating the effect of campaign spending on Senate election outcomes using instrumental variables. American Political Science Review, 92(2), 401–411. https://doi.org/10.2307/2585672
12.
GerberA. S. (2004). Does campaign spending work? Field experiments provide evidence and suggest new theory. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(5), 541–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764203260415
13.
GerberA. S.GimpelJ. G.GreenD. P.ShawD. R. (2011). How large and long-lasting are the persuasive effects of televised campaign ads? Results from a randomized field experiment. American Political Science Review, 105(1), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305541000047X
14.
HuangK.YeomansM.BrooksA. W.MinsonJ.GinoF. (2017). It doesn’t hurt to ask: Question-asking increases liking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(3), 430–452. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000097
KallaJ.BroockmanD. (2018). The minimal persuasive effects of campaign contact in general elections: Evidence from 49 field experiments. American Political Science Review, 112(1), 148–166. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055417000363
McGrawK. M. (2000). Contributions of the cognitive approach to political psychology. Political Psychology, 21(4), 805–832. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00217
23.
MohrJ.NevinJ. R. (1990). Communication strategies in marketing channels: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 36–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251758
PennycookG.BearA.CollinsE. T.RandD. G. (2020). The implied truth effect: Attaching warnings to a subset of fake news headlines increases perceived accuracy of headlines without warnings. Management Science, 66(11), 4921–5484. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3478
27.
PennycookG.RandD. G. (2019). Fighting misinformation on social media using crowdsourced judgments of news source quality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 116(7), 2521–2526. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1806781116
28.
PetrovaP. K.CialdiniR. B. (2011). New approaches toward resistance to persuasion. In HastingsG.BryantC.AngusK. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social marketing (pp. 107–122). SAGE.
29.
RoedigerH. L.IIITekinW.UnerO. (2017). Encoding–retrieval interactions. In ByrneJ. H. (Ed.), Learning and memory: A comprehensive reference (2nd ed., pp. 5–26). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.21036-5
30.
RogersT.FreyE. (2015). Changing behavior beyond the here and now. In KerenG.WuG. (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making (pp. 723–748). Wiley Blackwell.
RogersT.ZeckhauserR.GinoF.NortonM. I.SchweitzerM. E. (2017). Artful paltering: The risks and rewards of using truthful statements to mislead others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(3), 456–473. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000081
33.
SchwarzN.NewmanE.LeachW. (2016). Making the truth stick & the myths fade: Lessons from cognitive psychology. Behavioral Science & Policy, 2(1), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1353/bsp.2016.0009
34.
TaberC. S.YoungE. (2013). Political information processing. In HuddyL.SearsD. O.LevyJ. S. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political psychology (2nd ed., pp. 525–558). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199760107.013.0017
TulvingE. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. Oxford University Press.
37.
UnkelbachC.KochA.SilvaR. R.Garcia-MarquesT. (2019). Truth by repetition: Explanations and implications. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(3), 247–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419827854
38.
van der LindenS.RoozenbeekJ. (2020). Psychological inoculation against fake news. In GreifenederR.JafféM.NewmanE. J.SchwarzN. (Eds.), The psychology of fake news: Accepting, sharing, and correcting misinformation (pp. 147–170). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429295379-11
WahlheimC. N.AlexanderT. R.PeskeC. D. (2020). Reminders of everyday misinformation statements can enhance memory for and beliefs in corrections of those statements in the short term. Psychological Science, 31(10), 1325–1339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620952797
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
