Researchers and practitioners want to create opinions that stick. Yet whereas some opinions stay fixed, others are as fleeting as the time it takes to report them. In seven longitudinal studies with more than 20,000 individuals, we found that attitudes based more on emotion are relatively fixed. Whether participants evaluated brand-new Christmas gifts or one of 40 brands, the more emotional their opinion, the less it changed over time, particularly if it was positive. In a word-of-mouth linguistic analysis of 75,000 real-world online reviews, we found that the more emotional consumers are in their first review, the more that attitude persists when they express it again even years later. Finally, more emotion-evoking persuasive messages create attitudes that decay less over time, further establishing emotion’s causal effect. These effects persist above and beyond other attitude-strength attributes. Interestingly, we also found that lay individuals generally fail to appreciate the relation between emotionality and attitude stability.
AllenM.PoggialiD.WhitakerK.MarshallT. R.KievitR. A. (2019). Raincloud plots: A multi-platform tool for robust data visualization. Wellcome Open Research, 4, Article 63. doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15191.1
2.
BartleJ. (2000). Political awareness, opinion constraint and the stability of ideological positions. Political Studies, 48, 467–484. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.00270
3.
BechlerC. J.TormalaZ. L.RuckerD. D. (2019). Perceiving attitude change: How qualitative shifts augment change perception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 82, 160–175. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2019.02.001
4.
BergerJ. (2014). Word of mouth and interpersonal communication: A review and directions for future research. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24, 586–607. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2014.05.002
5.
BolgerN.LaurenceauJ.-P. (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
6.
BreslinC. W.SaferM. A. (2011). Effects of event valence on long-term memory for two baseball championship games. Psychological Science, 22, 1408–1412. doi:10.1177/0956797611419171
7.
BrittT. W.PusiloC. L.McKibbenE. S.KelleyC.BakerA. N.NielsonK. A. (2011). Personality and strength-related attitude dimensions: Between and within-person relationships. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 586–596. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2011.07.006
8.
CárdabaM. A. M.BriñolP.HorcajoJ.PettyR. E. (2013). The effect of need for cognition on the stability of prejudiced attitudes toward South American immigrants. Psicothema, 25, 73–78.
9.
ChaikenS. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752–766. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752
10.
CookT. D.FlayB. R. (1978). The persistence of experimentally induced attitude change. In BerkowitzL. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 1–57). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60004-0
11.
CritesS. L.FabrigarL. R.PettyR. E. (1994). Measuring the affective and cognitive properties of attitudes: Conceptual and methodological issues. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 619–634. doi:10.1177/0146167294206001
12.
EaglyA. H.ChaikenS. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
13.
FazioR. H. (1995). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility. In PettyR. E.KrosnickJ. A., Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 247–282). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14.
HamakerE. L.MuthénB. (2020). The fixed versus random effects debate and how it relates to centering in multilevel modeling. Psychological Methods, 25, 365–379. doi:10.1037/met0000239
15.
HaugtvedtC. P.PettyR. E. (1992). Personality and persuasion: Need for cognition moderates the persistence and resistance of attitude changes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 308–319. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.2.308
JuddC. M.WestfallJ.KennyD. A. (2012). Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: A new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 54–69. doi:10.1037/a0028347
18.
KrosnickJ. A.PettyR. E. (1995). Attitude strength: An overview. In PettyR. E.KrosnickJ. A. (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 1–24). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
19.
LaiC. K.SkinnerA. L.CooleyE.MurrarS.BrauerM.DevosT.. . . NosekB. A. (2016). Reducing implicit racial preferences: II. Intervention effectiveness across time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 1001–1016. doi:10.1037/xge0000179
20.
LakensD.ScheelA. M.IsagerP. M. (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1, 259–269. doi:10.1177/2515245918770963
21.
LavineH.ThomsenC. J.ZannaM. P.BorgidaE. (1998). On the primacy of affect in the determination of attitudes and behavior: The moderating role of affective-cognitive ambivalence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 398–421.
22.
LawtonR.ConnerM.McEachanR. (2009). Desire or reason: Predicting health behaviors from affective and cognitive attitudes. Health Psychology, 28, 56–65. doi:10.1037/a0013424
LuttrellA.PettyR. E.BriñolP. (2016). Ambivalence and certainty can interact to predict attitude stability over time. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 63, 56–68. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2015.11.008
25.
LuttrellA.PettyR. E.BriñolP. (2020). The interactive effects of ambivalence and certainty on political opinion stability. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 8, 525–541. doi:10.5964/jspp.v8i2.1247
26.
LuttrellA.SawickiV. (2020). Attitude strength: Distinguishing predictors versus defining features. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 14(8), Article e12555. doi:10.1111/spc3.12555
27.
RocklageM. D.FazioR. H. (2015). The Evaluative Lexicon: Adjective use as a means of assessing and distinguishing attitude valence, extremity, and emotionality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 56, 214–227. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.10.005
28.
RocklageM. D.FazioR. H. (2016). On the dominance of attitude emotionality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 259–270. doi:10.1177/0146167215623273
29.
RocklageM. D.FazioR. H. (2018). Attitude accessibility as a function of emotionality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44, 508–520. doi:10.1177/0146167217743762
30.
RocklageM. D.FazioR. H. (2020). The enhancing versus backfiring effects of positive emotion in consumer reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 57, 332–352. doi:10.1177/0022243719892594
31.
RocklageM. D.RuckerD. D.NordgrenL. F. (2018). The Evaluative Lexicon 2.0: The measurement of emotionality, extremity, and valence in language. Behavior Research Methods, 50, 1327–1344. doi:10.3758/s13428-017-0975-6
32.
SchwartzS. H. (1978). Temporal instability as a moderator of the attitude–behavior relationship. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 715–724. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.36.7.715
33.
SchwarzN. (2007). Attitude construction: Evaluation in context. Social Cognition, 25, 638–656. doi:10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.638
34.
ShroutP. E.StadlerG.LaneS. P.McClureM. J.JacksonG. L.ClavélF. D.. . . BolgerN. (2018). Initial elevation bias in subjective reports. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 115(1), E15–E23. doi:10.1073/pnas.1712277115
35.
SimonsJ. J. P.SchneiderI. K.Sanchez-BurksJ. (2019). Ambivalence, the person and the attitude object: Individual differences in the experience of ambivalence. PsyArXiv. doi:10.31234/osf.io/f7tvd
36.
SkowronskiJ. J.WalkerW. R.HendersonD. X.BondG. D. (2014). The fading affect bias: Its history, its implications, and its future. In OlsonJ. M.ZannaM. P. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 49, pp. 163–218). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-800052-6.00003-2
37.
WallaceL. E.PattonK. M.LuttrellA.SawickiV.FabrigarL. R.TeenyJ.. . . WegenerD. T. (2020). Perceived knowledge moderates the relation between subjective ambivalence and the “impact” of attitudes: An attitude strength perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46, 709–722. doi:10.1177/0146167219873492
38.
WestfallJ.KennyD. A.JuddC. M. (2014). Statistical power and optimal design in experiments in which samples of participants respond to samples of stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 2020–2045. doi:10.1037/xge0000014
39.
XuM.BriñolP.GrettonJ. D.TormalaZ. L.RuckerD. D.PettyR. E. (2020). Individual differences in attitude consistency over time: The Personal Attitude Stability Scale. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46, 1507–1519. doi:10.1177/0146167220908995
40.
ZhangK.MoeW. W. (2018). Measuring brand favorability using large-scale social media data. SSRN. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3165530
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
