AgadullinaE. R.LovakovA. V. (2018). Are people more prejudiced towards groups that are perceived as coherent? A meta-analysis of the relationship between out-group entitativity and prejudice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57, 703–731.
2.
*AizerA.CurrieJ. (2019). Lead and juvenile delinquency: New evidence from linked birth, school, and juvenile detention records. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 101, 575–587.
3.
BediouB.AdamsD. M.MayerR. E.TiptonE.GreenC. S.BavelierD. (2018). Meta-analysis of action video game impact on perceptual, attentional, and cognitive skills. Psychological Bulletin, 144, 77–110.
4.
*BermanJ. D.BurkhardtJ.BayhamJ.CarterE.WilsonA. (2019). Acute air pollution exposure and the risk of violent behavior in the United States. Epidemiology, 30, 799–806.
5.
*BondyM.RothS.SagerL. (2020). Crime is in the air: The contemporaneous relationship between air pollution and crime. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 7, 555–585.
6.
BrookR. D.RajagopalanS.PopeC. A.BrookJ. R.BhatnagarA.Diez-RouxA. V.. . . KaufmanJ. D. (2010). Particulate matter air pollution and cardiovascular disease: An update to the scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation, 121, 2331–2378.
7.
BrooksA. W.SchweitzerM. E. (2011). Can Nervous Nelly negotiate? How anxiety causes negotiators to make low first offers, exit early, and earn less profit. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115, 43–54. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.01.008
8.
*BurkhardtJ.BayhamJ.WilsonA.BermanJ. D.O’DellK.FordB.. . . PierceJ. R. (2020). The relationship between monthly air pollution and violent crime across the United States. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 9, 188–205. doi:10.1080/21606544.2019.1630014
9.
*ChenS.LiT. (2020). The effect of air pollution on criminal activities: Evidence from the NOx Budget Trading Program. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 83, Article 103528. doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2020.103528
10.
EndlerN. S.KocovskiN. L. (2001). State and trait anxiety revisited. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 15, 231–245.
11.
*FehrR.YamK. C.HeW.ChiangJ. T. J.WeiW. (2017). Polluted work: A self-control perspective on air pollution appraisals, organizational citizenship, and counterproductive work behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 143, 98–110.
FrieseM.FrankenbachJ.JobV.LoschelderD. D. (2017). Does self-control training improve self-control? A meta-analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 1077–1099.
14.
GohJ. X.HallJ. A.RosenthalR. (2016). Mini meta-analysis of your own studies: Some arguments on why and a primer on how. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10, 535–549.
15.
*GongS.LuJ. G.SchaubroeckJ. M.LiQ.ZhouQ.QianX. (2020). Polluted psyche: Is the effect of air pollution on unethical behavior more physiological or psychological? Manuscript submitted for publication.
16.
*HajhoseinyS.FathiZ.ShafieiH. (2019). Are those with darker personality traits more willing to corrupt when they feel anxious?Iranian Journal of Management Studies, 12, 451–479.
17.
*HaynesE. N.ChenA.RyanP.SuccopP.WrightJ.DietrichK. N. (2011). Exposure to airborne metals and particulate matter and risk for youth adjudicated for criminal activity. Environmental Research, 111, 1243–1248.
18.
HeckD. W.ThielmannI.HilbigB. E.MoshagenM. (2018). Who lies? A large-scale reanalysis linking basic personality traits to unethical decision making. Judgment and Decision Making, 13, 356–371.
19.
*HeckD. W.ThielmannI.KleinS. A.HilbigB. E. (2020). On the limited generality of air pollution and anxiety as causal determinants of unethical behavior: Commentary on Lu, Lee, Gino, and Galinsky (2018). Psychological Science, 31, 741–747. doi:10.1177/0956797619866627
20.
HedgesL. V.TiptonE.JohnsonM. C. (2010). Robust variance estimation in meta-regression with dependent effect size estimates. Research Synthesis Methods, 1, 39–65.
21.
HermansE. J.Van MarleH. J. F.OssewaardeL.HenckensM. J. A. G.QinS.Van KesterenM. T. R.. . . FernándezG. (2011). Stress-related noradrenergic activity prompts large-scale neural network reconfiguration. Science, 334, 1151–1153.
22.
*HerrnstadtE.HeyesA.MuehleggerE.SaberianS. (in press). Air pollution and criminal activity: Microgeographic evidence from Chicago. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics.
23.
JonesT. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16, 366–395. doi:10.5465/AMR.1991.4278958
24.
*KouchakiM.DesaiS. D. (2015). Anxious, threatened, and also unethical: How anxiety makes individuals feel threatened and commit unethical acts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 360–375.
25.
KurdiB.SeitchikA. E.AxtJ. R.CarrollT. J.KarapetyanA.KaushikN.. . . BanajiM. R. (2019). Relationship between the Implicit Association test and intergroup behavior: A meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 74, 569–586.
26.
*LiZ.WangZ.ZhuZ.ZhanX. (2018). Performance pressure and unethical pro-organizational behavior: Based on cognitive appraisal theory of emotion. Chinese Journal of Management, 15, 358–365.
27.
*LiaoS. X. (2019). Bayesian causal inference for estimating impacts of air pollution exposure. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.
28.
LuJ. G. (2020). Air pollution: A systematic review of its psychological, economic, and social effects. Current Opinion in Psychology, 32, 52–65.
29.
*LuJ. G.LeeJ. J.GinoF.GalinskyA. D. (2018). Polluted morality: Air pollution predicts criminal activity and unethical behavior. Psychological Science, 29, 340–355. doi:10.1177/0956797617735807
30.
LuJ. G.ZhangT.RuckerD. D.GalinskyA. D. (2018). On the distinction between unethical and selfish behavior. In GrayK.GrahamJ. (Eds.), Atlas of moral psychology: Mapping good and evil in the mind (pp. 465–474). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
31.
MathewsA. (1990). Why worry? The cognitive function of anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 28, 455–468.
32.
Melby-LervågM.LervågA. (2014). Reading comprehension and its underlying components in second-language learners: A meta-analysis of studies comparing first- and second-language learners. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 409–433.
33.
MoherD.LiberatiA.TetzlaffJ.AltmanD. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151, 264–269.
34.
Pacheco-UnguettiA. P.AcostaA.CallejasA.LupiáñezJ. (2010). Attention and anxiety: Different attentional functioning under state and trait anxiety. Psychological Science, 21, 298–304.
35.
PetersonR. A.BrownS. P. (2005). On the use of beta coefficients in meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 175–181.
36.
PowerM. C.KioumourtzoglouM. A.HartJ. E.OkerekeO. I.LadenF.WeisskopfM. G. (2015). The relation between past exposure to fine particulate air pollution and prevalent anxiety: Observational cohort study. BMJ, 350, Article h1111. doi:10.1136/bmj.h1111
37.
PunV. C.ManjouridesJ.SuhH. (2017). Association of ambient air pollution with depressive and anxiety symptoms in older adults: Results from the NSHAP study. Environmental Health Perspectives, 125, 342–348.
38.
*RodellJ. B.JudgeT. A. (2009). Can “good” stressors spark “bad” behaviors? The mediating role of emotions in links of challenge and hindrance stressors with citizenship and counterproductive behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1438–1451.
39.
*RottonJ.FreyJ. (1985). Air pollution, weather, and violent crimes: Concomitant time-series analysis of archival data. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1207–1220.
40.
SassV.Kravitz-WirtzN.KarceskiS. M.HajatA.CrowderK.TakeuchiD. (2017). The effects of air pollution on individual psychological distress. Health and Place, 48, 72–79.
41.
SimonsD. J.ShodaY.LindsayD. S. (2017). Constraints on Generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 1123–1128.
42.
SpielbergerC. D. (1966). Theory and research on anxiety. In SpielbergerC. D. (Ed.), Anxiety and Behavior (pp. 3–20). New York, NY: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-1-4832-3131-0.50006-8
43.
StanleyT. D.DoucouliagosH. (2014). Meta-regression approximations to reduce publication selection bias. Research Synthesis Methods, 5, 60–78.
44.
SterneJ. A. C.EggerM. (2005). Regression methods to detect publication and other bias in meta-analysis. In RothsteinH. R.SuttonA. J.BorensteinM. (Eds.), Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments (pp. 99–110). New York, NY: Wiley.
45.
*StreteskyP. B.LynchM. J. (2001). The relationship between lead exposure and homicide. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 155, 579–582.
46.
*StreteskyP. B.LynchM. J. (2004). The relationship between lead and crime. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 45, 214–229.
47.
*YounanD.TuvbladC.FranklinM.LurmannF.LiL.WuJ.. . . ChenJ. C. (2018). Longitudinal analysis of particulate air pollutants and adolescent delinquent behavior in Southern California. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 46, 1283–1293.
48.
*ZhangG.LiaoJ. (2014). Relationship between academic appraisal stressors and university teachers’ unethical behaviors. Chinese Journal of Management, 11, 360–366.
49.
*ZhangH.ShiY.ZhouZ. E.MaH.TangH. (2020). Good people do bad things: How anxiety promotes unethical behavior through intuitive and automatic processing. Current Psychology, 39, 720–728. doi:10.1007/s12144-018-9789-7
50.
ZouE. (2020). Unwatched pollution: The effect of intermittent monitoring on air quality. Manuscript submitted for publication.
51.
ZuckermanM.SpielbergerC. D. (2015). Emotions and anxiety: New concepts, methods, and applications. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.