*BakkerM.VeldkampC. L. S.van AssenM. A. L. M.CrompvoetsE. A. V.OngH. H.NosekB. A. . .WichertsJ. M. (2020). Ensuring the quality and specificity of preregistrations. PsyArXiv Preprints. doi:10.31234/osf.io/cdgyh
4.
*BakkerM.HartgerinkC. H. J.WichertsJ. M.van der MassH. L. J. (2016). Researchers’ intuitions about power in psychological research. Psychological Science, 27, 1069–1077. doi:10.1177/0956797616647519
5.
*CohenJ. (1962). The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 65, 145-153. (https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045186)
*CummingG. (2014). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science, 25, 7–29. doi:10.1177/0956797613504966
8.
*CummingG.Calin-JagemanR. (2017). Introduction to the new statistics: Estimation, open science, & beyond. Abingdon, England: Routledge.
9.
*EichE. (2014). Business not as usual. Psychological Science, 25, 3–6. doi:10.1177/0956797613512465
10.
EricsonJ. M.KravitzD. J.MitroffS. R. (2017). Visual search: You are who you are (+ A Learning Curve). Perception, 46, 1434–1441. doi:10.1177/0301006617721091
11.
García MárquezG. (1988). Love in the time of cholera (GrossmanE., Trans.). New York, NY: Knopf. (Original work published 1985)
12.
*GelmanA.CarlinJ. (2014). Beyond power calculations: Assessing Type S (Sign) and Type M (Magnitude) errors. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 641–651. doi:10.1177/1745691614551642
13.
*HarmsC.LakensD. (2018). Making ‘null effects’ informative: Statistical techniques and inferential frameworks. PsyArXiv Preprints. Retrieved from https://psyarxiv.com/48zca
14.
*JASP Team. (2019). JASP—A fresh way to do statistics. Retrieved from https://jasp-stats.org/
*KravitzD. J.MitroffS. R. (2020). Quantifying, and correcting for, the impact of questionable research practices on false discovery rates in psychological science. PsyArXiv Preprints. doi:10.31234/osf.io/fu9gy
17.
KriegeskorteN.SimmonsW. K.BellgowanP. S.BakerC. I. (2009). Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: The dangers of double dipping. Nature Neuroscience, 12, 535–540. doi:10.1038/nn.2303
18.
*LindsayD. S. (2015). Replication in Psychological Science. Psychological Science, 26, 1827–1832. doi:10.1177/0956797615616374
19.
*LindsayD. S. (2017). Sharing data and materials in Psychological Science. Psychological Science, 28(6), 699–702. doi:10.1177/0956797617704015
*MassonM. E. J. (2011). A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing. Behavior Research Methods, 43, 679–690. doi:10.3758/s13428-010-0049-5
22.
*MellorD.VazireS.LindsayD. S. (2018). Transparent science: A more credible, reproducible, and publishable way to do science. PsyArXiv Preprints. doi:10.31234/osf.io/7wkdn
23.
MitroffS. R.BiggsA. T.AdamoS. H.DowdE. W.WinkleJ.ClarkK. (2015). What can 1 billion trials tell us about visual search?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41, 1–5. doi:10.1037/xhp0000012
24.
MitroffS. R.SharpeB. (2017). Using big data to solve real problems through academic and industry partnerships. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 18, 91–96. doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.09.013
25.
Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), Article aac4716. doi:10.1126/science.aac4716
26.
*The Open Science Framework. (2020). OSF Preregistration. Retrieved from osf.io/prereg/
27.
*The Open Science Framework. (2020). OSFHOME. Retrieved from osf.io
28.
*RifeS. C.NuijtenM. B.EpskampS. (2016). statcheck: Extract statistics from articles and recompute p-values [web application]. Retrieved from http://statcheck.io
29.
SimmonsJ. P.NelsonL. D.SimonsohnU. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22, 1359–1366. doi:10.1177/0956797611417632
30.
*SimonsD. J.ShodaY.LindsayD. S. (2017). Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 1123–1128. doi:10.1177/1745691617708630
31.
TalaricoJ. M.RubinD. C. (2003). Confidence, not consistency, characterizes flashbulb memories. Psychological Science, 14, 455–461. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.02453