Whether acquiring a second language affords any general advantages to executive function has been a matter of fierce scientific debate for decades. If being bilingual does have benefits over and above the broader social, employment, and lifestyle gains that are available to speakers of a second language, then it should manifest as a cognitive advantage in the general population of bilinguals. We assessed 11,041 participants on a broad battery of 12 executive tasks whose functional and neural properties have been well described. Bilinguals showed an advantage over monolinguals on only one test (whereas monolinguals performed better on four tests), and these effects all disappeared when the groups were matched to remove potentially confounding factors. In any case, the size of the positive bilingual effect in the unmatched groups was so small that it would likely have a negligible impact on the cognitive performance of any individual.
BialystokE. (2015). Bilingualism and the development of executive function: The role of attention. Child Development Perspectives, 9, 117–121. doi:10.1111/cdep.12116
4.
BialystokE. (2017). The bilingual adaptation: How minds accommodate experience. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 233–262. doi:10.1037/bul0000099
5.
BialystokE.CraikF.LukG. (2008). Cognitive control and lexical access in younger and older bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 859–873. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.859
6.
BlumenfeldH. K.MarianV. (2014). Cognitive control in bilinguals: Advantages in stimulus–stimulus inhibition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 610–629. doi:10.1017/S1366728913000564
7.
BorD.DuncanJ.LeeA. C. H.ParrA.OwenA. M. (2006). Frontal lobe involvement in spatial span: Converging studies of normal and impaired function. Neuropsychologia, 44, 229–237. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsy chologia.2005.05.010
8.
BritoN. H.MurphyE. R.VaidyaC.BarrR. (2016). Do bilingual advantages in attentional control influence memory encoding during a divided attention task?Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19, 621–629. doi:10.1017/S1366728915000851
9.
CattellR. B. (1949). The dimensions of culture patterns by factorization of national characters. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44, 443–469. doi:10.1037/h0054760
10.
CollinsP.RobertsA. C.DiasR.EverittB. J.RobbinsT. W. (1998). Perseveration and strategy in a novel spatial self-ordered sequencing task for nonhuman primates: Effects of excitotoxic lesions and dopamine depletions of the prefrontal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 332–354.
de BruinA.TreccaniB.Della SalaS. (2015). Cognitive advantage in bilingualism: An example of publication bias?Psychological Science, 26, 99–107. doi:10.1177/0956797614557866
13.
FestmanJ.Rodriguez-FornellsA.MünteT. F. (2010). Individual differences in control of language interference in late bilinguals are mainly related to general executive abilities. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 6, Article 5. doi:10.1186/1744-9081-6-5
14.
FolsteinM. F.FolsteinS. E.McHughP. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198. doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
15.
GouldR. L.BrownR. G.OwenA. M.BullmoreE. T.WilliamsS. C. R.HowardR. J. (2005). Functional neuroanatomy of successful paired associate learning in Alzheimer’s disease. American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, 2049–2060.
16.
GrundyJ. G.TimmerK. (2017). Bilingualism and working memory capacity: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Second Language Research, 33, 325–340. doi:10.1177/0267658316678286
17.
GunzenhauserC.KarbachJ.SaalbachH. (2019). Function of verbal strategies in monolingual vs. bilingual students’ planning performance: An experimental approach. Cognitive Development, 50, 1–12. doi:10.1016/j .cogdev.2019.01.003
18.
HampshireA.HighfieldR. R.ParkinB. L.OwenA. M. (2012). Fractionating human intelligence. Neuron, 76, 1225–1237. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.06.022
19.
HernándezM.CostaA.FuentesL. J.VivasA. B.Sebastián-GallésN. (2010). The impact of bilingualism on the executive control and orienting networks of attention. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 315–325. doi:10.1017/S1366728909990010
20.
HoD. E.ImaiK.KingG.StuartE. A. (2011). MatchIt: Nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. Journal of Statistical Software, 42(8). doi:10.18637/jss.v042.i08
21.
InoueS.MatsuzawaT. (2007). Working memory of numerals in chimpanzees. Current Biology, 17, 1004–1005.
22.
KempeV.KirkN. W.BrooksP. J. (2015). Revisiting theoretical and causal explanations for the bilingual advantage in executive functioning. Cortex, 73, 342–344. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2015.07.021
23.
KerriganL.ThomasM. S. C.BrightP.FilippiR. (2017). Evidence of an advantage in visuo-spatial memory for bilingual compared to monolingual speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20, 602–612. doi:10.1017/S1366728915000917
24.
LehtonenM.SoveriA.LaineA.JärvenpääJ.de BruinA.AntfolkJ. (2018). Is bilingualism associated with enhanced executive functioning in adults? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 144, 394–425.
25.
MacnamaraB. N.ConwayA. R. A. (2014). Novel evidence in support of the bilingual advantage: Influences of task demands and experience on cognitive control and working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 21, 520–525. doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0524-y
26.
MehtaM. A.OwenA. M.SahakianB. J.MavaddatN.PickardJ. D.RobbinsT. W. (2000). Methylphenidate enhances working memory by modulating discrete frontal and parietal lobe regions in the human brain. The Journal of Neuroscience, 20(6), Article RC65.
27.
MoralesJ.CalvoA.BialystokE. (2013). Working memory development in monolingual and bilingual children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114, 187–202. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2012.09.002
28.
MortonJ. B.HarperS. N. (2007). What did Simon say? Revisiting the bilingual advantage. Developmental Science, 10, 719–726. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00623.x
29.
NobleK. G.NormanF. M.FarahM. J. (2005). Neurocognitive correlates of socioeconomic status in kindergarten children. Developmental Science, 8(1), 74–87.
30.
OwenA. M.DownesJ. J.SahakianB. J.PolkeyC. E.RobbinsT. W. (1990). Planning and spatial working memory following frontal lobe lesions in man. Neuropsychologia, 28, 1021–1034. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(90)90137-D
31.
OwenA. M.SahakianB. J.SempleJ.PolkeyC. E.RobbinsT. W. (1995). Visuo-spatial short-term recognition memory and learning after temporal lobe excisions, frontal lobe excisions or amygdalo-hippocampectomy in man. Neuropsychologia, 33(1), 1–24.
32.
PaapK. R.JohnsonH. A.SawiO. (2016). Should the search for bilingual advantages in executive functioning continue?Cortex, 74, 305–314. doi:10.1016/j.cor tex.2015.09.010
33.
PeraniD.FarsadM.BallariniT.LubianF.MalpettiM.FracchettiA.. . . AbutalebiJ. (2017). The impact of bilingualism on brain reserve and metabolic connectivity in Alzheimer’s dementia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 114, 1690–1695. doi:10.1073/pnas.1610909114
34.
RatiuI.AzumaT. (2015). Working memory capacity: Is there a bilingual advantage?Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27(1), 1–11. doi:10.1080/20445911.2014.976226
35.
R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/
36.
RosselliM.ArdilaA.LalwaniL. N.Vélez-UribeI. (2016). The effect of language proficiency on executive functions in balanced and unbalanced Spanish-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19, 489–503. doi:10.1017/S1366728915000309
37.
ShalliceT. (1982). Specific impairments of planning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 298, 199–209. doi:10.1098/rstb.1982.0082
38.
SilvermanI. I.ChoiJ.MackewnA.FisherM.OlshanskyE. (2000). Evolved mechanisms underlying wayfinding: Further studies on the hunter-gatherer theory of spatial sex differences. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 201–213.
39.
StroopJ. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.
40.
TreismanA. M.GeladeG. (1980). Engineering education—status quo in Austria in comparison with the academic field of business education. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.
41.
WagenmakersE.-J. (2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 779–804. doi:10.3758/BF03194105
42.
WechslerD. (1981). The psychometric tradition: Developing the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 6, 82–85. doi:10.1016/0361-476X(81)90035-7
43.
WesnesK. A.BrookerH.BallardC.MccambridgeL.StentonR.CorbettA. (2017). Utility, reliability, sensitivity and validity of an online test system designed to monitor changes in cognitive function in clinical trials. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 32, e83–e92. doi:10.1002/gps.4659
44.
WickhamH. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
45.
WildC. J.NicholsE. S.BattistaM. E.StojanoskiB.OwenA. M. (2018). Dissociable effect of self-reported daily sleep duration on high-level cognitive abilities. Sleep, 41, Article zsy182. doi:10.1093/sleep/zsy182
46.
Williams-GrayC. H.HampshireA.RobbinsT. W.OwenA. M.BarkerR. A. (2007). Catechol O-methyltransferase val158met genotype influences frontoparietal activity during planning in patients with Parkinson’s disease. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 4832–4838. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0774-07.2007
47.
WoodS. J.ProffittT.MahonyK.SmithD. J.BuchananJ. A.BrewerW.. . . PantelisC. (2002). Visuospatial memory and learning in first-episode schizophreniform psychosis and established schizophrenia: A functional correlate of hippocampal pathology?Psychological Medicine, 32, 429–438. doi:10.1017/S0033291702005275
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
