AczelB.SzasziB.SarafoglouA.KekecsZ.KucharskýŠ.BenjaminD.. . . WagenmakersE.-J. (2019). A consensus-based transparency checklist. Nature Human Behaviour. Advance online publication. doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0772-6
2.
ArnettJ. J. (2008). The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American. American Psychologist, 63, 602–614.
3.
CheekN. N. (2017). Scholarly merit in a global context: The nation gap in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 1133–1137.
4.
FecherB.FriesikeS. (2014). Open science: One term, five schools of thought. In BartlingS.FriesikeS. (Eds.), Opening science: The evolving guide on how the Internet is changing research, collaboration and scholarly publishing (pp. 17–48). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
5.
HenrichJ.HeineS. J.NorenzayanA. (2010). The weirdest people in the world?Behavior and Brain Sciences, 33, 61–83.
6.
KarpickeJ. D.GrimaldiP. J. (2012). Retrieval-based learning: A perspective for enhancing meaningful learning. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 401–418.
7.
RadM. S.MartinganoA. J.GingesJ. (2018). Toward a psychology of Homo sapiens: Making psychological science more representative of the human population. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 115, 11401–11405.
8.
StokesD. E. (1997). Pasteur’s quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.