CeciS. J.GintherD. K.KahnS.WilliamsW. M. (2014). Women in academic science: A changing landscape. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 15, 75–141. doi:10.1177/1529100614541236
2.
CeciS. J.WilliamsW. M.BarnettS. M. (2009). Women’s underrepresentation in science: Sociocultural and biological considerations. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 218–261. doi:10.1037/a0014412
3.
CharlesM.BradleyK. (2009). Indulging our gendered selves? Sex segregation by field of study in 44 countries. American Journal of Sociology, 114, 924–976. doi:10.1086/595942
4.
CheryanS.ZieglerS. A.MontoyaA. K.JiangL. (2017). Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others?Psychological Bulletin, 143, 1–35. doi:10.1037/bul0000052
5.
Else-QuestN. M.HamiltonV. (2018). Measurement and analysis of nation-level gender equity in the psychology of women. In TravisC. B.WhiteJ. W. (Eds.), APA handbook of the psychology of women (Vol. 2, pp. 545–563). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
6.
FalkA.HermleJ. (2018). Relationship of gender differences in preferences to economic development and gender equality. Science, 362(6412), Article eaas9899. doi:10.1126/science.aas9899
7.
HawkenA.MunckG. L. (2013). Cross-national indices with gender-differentiated data: What do they measure? How valid are they?Social Indicators Research, 111, 801–838. doi:10.1007/s11205-012-0035-7
LippaR. A.CollaerM. L.PetersM. (2010). Sex differences in mental rotation and line angle judgments are positively associated with gender equality and economic development across 53 nations. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 990–997.
10.
MillerD. I.EaglyA. H.LinnM. C. (2015). Women’s representation in science predicts national gender-science stereotypes: Evidence from 66 nations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1073, 631–647. doi:10.1037/edu0000005
11.
PinkerS. (2008). The sexual paradox: Men, women and the real gender gap. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
12.
SchmittD. P. (2015). The evolution of culturally-variable sex differences: Men and women are not always different, but when they are. . .It appears not to result from patriarchy or sex role socialization. In ShackelfordT. K.HansenR. D. (Eds.), The evolution of sexuality (pp. 221–256). London, England: Springer.
13.
StoetG.GearyD. C. (2018). The gender-equality paradox in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Psychological Science, 29, 581–593. doi:10.1177/0956797617741719
14.
StoetG.GearyD. C. (2019). A simplified approach to measuring national gender inequality. PLOS ONE, 14(1), Article e0205349. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0205349
15.
ThébaudS.CharlesM. (2018). Segregation, stereotypes, and STEM. Social Sciences, 7(7), Article 111. doi:10.3390/socsci7070111
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2015). Education: Distribution of tertiary graduates by field of study [Data file]. Retrieved from http://data.uis.unesco.org/index.aspx?queryid=163