The limited space immediately surrounding our body, known as peripersonal space (PPS), has been investigated by focusing on changes in the multisensory processing of audio-tactile stimuli occurring within or outside the PPS. Some studies have reported that the PPS representation is extended by body actions such as walking. However, it is unclear whether the PPS changes when a walking-like sensation is induced but the body neither moves nor is forced to move. Here, we show that a rhythmic pattern consisting of walking-sound vibrations applied to the soles of the feet, but not the forearms, boosted tactile processing when looming sounds were located near the body. The findings suggest that an extension of the PPS representation can be triggered by stimulating the soles in the absence of body action, which may automatically drive a motor program for walking, leading to a change in spatial cognition around the body.
AmemiyaT.HirotaK.IkeiY. (2016). Tactile apparent motion on the torso modulates perceived forward self-motion velocity. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 9, 474–482. doi:10.1109/TOH.2016.2598332
2.
BremmerF.SchlackA.ShahN. J.ZafirisO.KubischikM.HoffmannK.. . . FinkG. R. (2001). Polymodal motion processing in posterior parietal and premotor cortex: A human fMRI study strongly implies equivalencies between humans and monkeys. Neuron, 29, 287–296.
BrozzoliC.GentileG.EhrssonH. H. (2012). That’s near my hand! Parietal and premotor coding of hand-centered space contributes to localization and self-attribution of the hand. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 14573–14582.
5.
CanzoneriE.MagossoE.SerinoA. (2012). Dynamic sounds capture the boundaries of peripersonal space representation in humans. PLOS ONE, 7(9), Article e44306. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0044306
6.
CheronG.DuvinageM.De SaedeleerC.CastermansT.BengoetxeaA.PetieauM.. . . IvanenkoY. (2012). From spinal central pattern generators to cortical network: Integrated BCI for walking rehabilitation. Neural Plasticity, 2012, Article 375148. doi:10.1155/2012/375148
7.
CléryJ.GuipponiO.WardakC.HamedS. B. (2015). Neuronal bases of peripersonal and extrapersonal spaces, their plasticity and their dynamics: Knowns and unknowns. Neuropsychologia, 70, 313–326. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.10.022
8.
di PellegrinoG.LàdavasE. (2015). Peripersonal space in the brain. Neuropsychologia, 66, 126–133. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.11.011
9.
di PellegrinoG.LàdavasE.FarnéA. (1997). Seeing where your hands are. Nature, 388, 730.
10.
FallonJ. B.BentL. R.McNultyP. A.MacefieldV. G. (2005). Evidence for strong synaptic coupling between single tactile afferents from the sole of the foot and motoneurons supplying leg muscles. Journal of Neurophysiology, 94, 3795–3804. doi:10.1152/jn.00359.2005
11.
FinisguerraA.CanzoneriE.SerinoA.PozzoT.BassolinoM. (2015). Moving sounds within the peripersonal space modulate the motor system. Neuropsychologia, 70, 421–428. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.09.043
12.
GalliG.NoelJ. P.CanzoneriE.BlankeO.SerinoA. (2015). The wheelchair as a full-body tool extending the peripersonal space. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 639. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00639
13.
GravanoS.IvanenkoY. P.MaccioniG.MacellariV.PoppeleR. E.LacquanitiF. (2011). A novel approach to mechanical foot stimulation during human locomotion under body weight support. Human Movement Science, 30, 352–367. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2010.01.002
14.
GrazianoM. S.CookeD. F. (2006). Parieto-frontal interactions, personal space, and defensive behavior. Neuropsychologia, 44, 845–859.
15.
GrivazP.BlankeO.SerinoA. (2017). Common and distinct brain regions processing multisensory bodily signals for peripersonal space and body ownership. NeuroImage, 147, 602–618.
16.
KandulaM.Van der StoepN.HofmanD.DijkermanH. C. (2017). On the contribution of overt tactile expectations to visuo-tactile interactions within the peripersonal space. Experimental Brain Research, 235, 2511–2522. doi:10.1007/s00221-017-4965-9
17.
KavounoudiasA.RollR.RollJ.-P. (2001). Foot sole and ankle muscle inputs contribute jointly to human erect posture regulation. Journal of Physiology, 532, 869–878. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0869e.x
18.
LongoM. R.LourencoS. F. (2006). On the nature of near space: Effects of tool use and the transition to far space. Neuropsychologia, 44, 977–981. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.09.003
19.
LongoM. R.LourencoS. F. (2007). Space perception and body morphology: Extent of near space scales with arm length. Experimental Brain Research, 177, 285–290. doi:10.1007/s00221-007-0855-x
20.
LuceR. D. (1986). Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
21.
MacalusoE.MaravitaA. (2010). The representation of space near the body through touch and vision. Neuropsychologia, 48, 782–795. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.10.010
22.
MakinT. R.HolmesN. P.BrozzoliC.RossettiY.FarnèA. (2009). Coding of visual space during motor preparation: Approaching objects rapidly modulate corticospinal excitability in hand-centered coordinates. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 11841–11851.
23.
MakinT. R.HolmesN. P.ZoharyE. (2007). Is that near my hand? Multisensory representation of peripersonal space in human intraparietal sulcus. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 731–740. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3653-06.2007
24.
MaravitaA.IrikiA. (2004). Tools for the body (schema). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 79–86. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.12.008
25.
MaravitaA.SpenceC.KennetS.DriverJ. (2002). Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans. Cognition, 83, 25–34.
26.
MiddlebrooksJ. C.GreenD. M. (1991). Sound localization by human listeners. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 135–159. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.42.020191.001031
27.
NoelJ. P.GrivazP.MarmaroliP.LissekH.BlankeO.SerinoA. (2015). Full body action remapping of peripersonal space: The case of walking. Neuropsychologia, 70, 375–384. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.08.030
28.
PfeifferC.NoelJ.SerinoA.BlankeO. (2018). Vestibular modulation of peripersonal space boundaries. European Journal of Neuroscience, 47, 800–811. doi:10.1111/ejn.13872
29.
RieckeB. E.VäljamäeA.Schulte-PelkumJ. (2009). Moving sounds enhance the visually-induced self-motion illusion (circular vection) in virtual reality. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 6(2), Article 7. doi:10.1145/1498700.1498701
30.
RizzolattiG.FadigaL.FogassiL.GalleseV. (1997). The space around us. Science, 277, 190–191. doi:10.1126/science.277.5323.190
31.
RoweD.WelkG.HeilD.MaharM.KembleC.CalabroM.CamenischK. (2011). Stride rate recommendations for moderate-intensity walking. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 43, 312–318. doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181e9d99a
32.
SerinoA.AnnellaL.AvenantiA. (2009). Motor properties of peripersonal space in humans. PLOS ONE, 4(8), Article e6582. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006582
33.
SerinoA.NoelJ. P.GalliG.CanzoneriE.MarmaroliP.LissekH.BlankeO. (2015). Body part-centered and full body-centered peripersonal space representations. Scientific Reports, 5, Article 18603. doi:10.1038/srep18603
34.
TeneggiC.CanzoneriE.di PellegrinoG.SerinoA. (2013). Social modulation of peripersonal space boundaries. Current Biology, 23, 406–411.
35.
TerrierP.SchutzY. (2003). Variability of gait patterns during unconstrained walking assessed by satellite positioning (GPS). European Journal of Applied Physiology, 90, 554–561. doi:10.1007/s00421-003-0906-3
36.
TurchetL.BurelliP.SerafinS. (2013). Haptic feedback for enhancing realism of walking simulations. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 6, 35–45. doi:10.1109/TOH.2012.51
37.
VisellY.GiordanoB. L.MilletG.CooperstockJ. R. (2011). Vibration influences haptic perception of surface compliance during walking. PLOS ONE, 6(3), Article e17697. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017697
38.
WarrenW. H.HannonD. J. (1988). Direction of self-motion is perceived from optical flow. Nature, 336, 162–163. doi:10.1038/336162a0
39.
ZelazoP. R.ZelazoN. A.KolbS. (1972). “Walking” in the newborn. Science, 176, 314–315. doi:10.1126/science.176.4032.314
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
