Should Trolleys Be Scared of Mice? Replies to Evans and Brandt (2019);Białek,Turpin,and Fugelsang (2019);Colman,Gold,and Pulford (2019);and Plunkett and Greene (2019)
Restricted accessArticle commentaryFirst published online September, 2019
Should Trolleys Be Scared of Mice? Replies to Evans and Brandt (2019);Białek,Turpin,and Fugelsang (2019);Colman,Gold,and Pulford (2019);and Plunkett and Greene (2019)
BaumeisterR. F.BratslavskyE.FinkenauerC.VohsK. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323–370.
2.
BiałekM.TurpinM. H.FugelsangJ. A. (2019). What is the right question for moral psychology to answer? Commentary on Bostyn, Sevenhant, and Roets (2018). Psychological Science, 30, 1383–1385.
3.
BostynD. H.RoetsA. (2017). Trust, trolleys and social dilemmas: A replication study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(5), e1–e7.
4.
BostynD. H.SevenhantS.RoetsA. (2018). Of mice, men, and trolleys: Hypothetical judgment versus real-life behavior in trolley-style moral dilemmas. Psychological Science, 29, 1084–1093. doi:10.1177/0956797617752640
5.
BostynD. H.SevenhantS.RoetsA. (2019). Beyond physical harm: How preference for consequentialism and primary psychopathy relate to decisions on a monetary trolley dilemma. Thinking & Reasoning, 25, 192–206.
6.
BoyntonM. H.PortnoyD. B.JohnsonB. T. (2013). Exploring the ethics and psychological impact of deception in psychological research. IRB: Ethics & Human Research, 35(2), 7–13.
7.
ColmanA. M.GoldN.PulfordB. D. (2019). Comparing hypothetical and real-life trolley problems: Commentary on Bostyn, Sevenhant, and Roets (2018). Psychological Science, 30, 1386–1388.
8.
ConwayP.GawronskiB. (2013). Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: A process dissociation approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 216–235.
9.
EvansA. M.BrandtM. J. (2019). Comparing the effects of hypothetical moral preferences on real-life and hypothetical behavior: Commentary on Bostyn, Sevenhant, and Roets (2018). Psychological Science, 30, 1380–1382.
10.
EverettJ. A.PizarroD. A.CrockettM. J. (2016). Inference of trustworthiness from intuitive moral judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 772–787.
11.
GoldN.ColmanA.PulfordB. (2014). Cultural differences in responses to real-life and hypothetical trolley problems. Judgment and Decision Making, 9, 65–76.
12.
HertwigR.OrtmannA. (2008). Deception in experiments: Revisiting the arguments in its defense. Ethics & Behavior, 18, 59–92.
13.
PlunkettD.GreeneJ. D. (2019). Overlooked evidence and a misunderstanding of what trolley dilemmas do best: Commentary on Bostyn, Sevenhant, and Roets (2018). Psychological Science, 30, 1389–1391.
14.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 1039–1061.