In the present study, we used an item-method directed-forgetting paradigm to test whether instructions to forget or remember one item affect memory for subsequently studied items. In two experiments (Ns = 138 and 33, respectively), recall was higher when a word pair was preceded during study by a to-be-forgotten word pair. This effect was cumulative: Performance increased when more preceding study items were to be forgotten. The effect decreased when memory was conditioned on instructions for items appearing farther back in the study list. Experiment 2 used a dual-task paradigm that suppressed, during encoding, verbal rehearsal or attentional refreshing. Neither task removed the effect, ruling out that rehearsal or attentional borrowing is responsible for the advantage conferred from previous to-be-forgotten items. We propose that memory formation depletes a limited resource that recovers over time and that to-be-forgotten items consume fewer resources, leaving more resources available for storing subsequent items. A computational model implementing the theory provided excellent fits to the data.
BasdenB. H.BasdenD. R.GarganoG. J. (1993). Directed forgetting in implicit and explicit memory tests: A comparison of methods. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 603–616.
2.
BjorkR. A. (1970). Positive forgetting: The noninterference of items intentionally forgotten. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 255–268.
3.
BjorkR. A. (1972). Theoretical implications of directed forgetting. In MeltonA. W.MartinE. (Eds.), Coding processes in human memory (pp. 217–235). Washington, DC: Winston.
4.
BrownG. D.NeathI.ChaterN. (2007). A temporal ratio model of memory. Psychological Review, 114, 539–576.
5.
BürknerP.-C. (2017). brms: An R package for Bayesian multilevel models using Stan. Journal of Statistical Software, 80(1). doi:10.18637/jss.v080.i01
6.
CamosV.LagnerP.BarrouilletP. (2009). Two maintenance mechanisms of verbal information in working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 457–469.
7.
CraikF. I.GovoniR.Naveh-BenjaminM.AndersonN. D. (1996). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 159–180.
8.
CrissA. H.AueW. R.SmithL. (2011). The effects of word frequency and context variability in cued recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 119–132.
9.
DettermanD. K. (1975). The von Restorff effect and induced amnesia: Production by manipulation of sound intensity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1, 614–628.
10.
DianaR. A.RederL. M. (2006). The low-frequency encoding disadvantage: Word frequency affects processing demands. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 805–815.
11.
EpsteinW. (1972). Mechanisms of directed forgetting. In BowerG. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 6, pp. 147–191). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
12.
FawcettJ. M.TaylorT. L. (2008). Forgetting is effortful: Evidence from reaction time probes in an item-method directed forgetting task. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1168–1181.
13.
FawcettJ. M.TaylorT. L. (2012). The control of working memory resources in intentional forgetting: Evidence from incidental probe word recognition. Acta Psychologica, 139, 84–90.
14.
GelmanA.JakulinA.PittauM. G.SuY. S. (2008). A weakly informative default prior distribution for logistic and other regression models. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 2, 1360–1383.
HeisterJ.WürznerK.-M.BubenzerJ.PohlE.HanneforthT.GeykenA.KlieglR. (2011). dlexDB-eine lexikalische datenbank für die psychologische und linguistische forschung [dlexDB: A lexical database for psychological and linguistic research]. Psychologische Rundschau, 62(1), 10–20.
17.
HourihanK. L.OzubkoJ. D.MacLeodC. M. (2009). Directed forgetting of visual symbols: Evidence for nonverbal selective rehearsal. Memory & Cognition, 37, 1059–1068.
18.
HulmeC.StuartG.BrownG. D.MorinC. (2003). High- and low-frequency words are recalled equally well in alternating lists: Evidence for associative effects in serial recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 500–518.
19.
KampS. M.LehmanM.MalmbergK. J.DonchinE. (2016). A buffer model account of behavioral and ERP patterns in the Von Restorff paradigm. AIMS Neuroscience, 3, 181–202.
20.
LeeM. D.WagenmakersE.-J. (2013). Bayesian cognitive modeling: A practical course. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
21.
LehmanM.MalmbergK. J. (2013). A buffer model of memory encoding and temporal correlations in retrieval. Psychological Review, 120, 155–189.
22.
MalmbergK. J.MurnaneK. (2002). List composition and the word-frequency effect for recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 616–630.
23.
MalmbergK. J.NelsonT. O. (2003). The word frequency effect for recognition memory and the elevated-attention hypothesis. Memory & Cognition, 31, 35–43.
24.
MarevicI.ArnoldN. R.RummelJ. (2018). Item-method directed forgetting and working memory capacity: A hierarchical multinomial modeling approach. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 1070–1080.
25.
McFarlaneK. A.HumphreysM. S. (2012). Maintenance rehearsal: The key to the role attention plays in storage and forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1001–1018.
26.
PastötterB.TempelT.BäumlK.-H. T. (2017). Long-term memory updating: The reset-of-encoding hypothesis in list-method directed forgetting. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 2076. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02076
27.
PopovV.RederL. (in press). Frequency effects on memory: A resource-limited theory. Psychological Review. doi:10.1037/rev0000161
28.
PopovV.SoM.RederL. (2019). Word frequency affects binding probability not memory precision. Retrieved from PsyArXiv Preprints: https://psyarxiv.com/deyjm/
29.
R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
30.
RederL. M.LiuX. L.KeinathA.PopovV. (2016). Building knowledge requires bricks, not sand: The critical role of familiar constituents in learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 271–277.
31.
RederL. M.PaynterC.DianaR. A.NgiamJ.DickisonD. (2007). Experience is a double-edged sword: A computational model of the encoding/retrieval trade-off with familiarity. In BenjaminA. S.RossB. H. (Eds.), Skill and strategy in memory use: The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 48, pp. 271–312). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
32.
RummelJ.MarevicI.KuhlmannB. G. (2016). Investigating storage and retrieval processes of directed forgetting: A model-based approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, 1526–1543.
33.
SahakyanL.KelleyC. M. (2002). A contextual change account of the directed forgetting effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 1064–1072.
34.
SederbergP. B.HowardM. W.KahanaM. J. (2008). A context-based theory of recency and contiguity in free recall. Psychological Review, 115, 893–912.
35.
ShenZ.PopovV.DelahayA. B.RederL. M. (2018). Item strength affects working memory capacity. Memory & Cognition, 46, 204–215.
36.
ShiffrinR. M.SteyversM. (1997). A model for recognition memory: REM—retrieving effectively from memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 145–166.
37.
UnsworthN.SpillersG. J. (2010). Variation in working memory capacity and episodic recall: The contributions of strategic encoding and contextual retrieval. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 200–205.
38.
WagenmakersE.-J.MoreyR. D.LeeM. D. (2016). Bayesian benefits for the pragmatic researcher. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25, 169–176.
39.
WatkinsM. J.LeCompteD. C.KimK. (2000). Role of study strategy in recall of mixed lists of common and rare words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learn-ing, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 239–245.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
