Using Behavioral Science To Inform Policies Limiting Sugary-Drink Portions: Reply to Wilson and Stolarz-Fantino (2018)

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

John

L. K.

Donnelly

G. E.

Roberto

C. A.

(2017). Psychologically informed implementations of sugary-drink portion limits. Psychological Science, 28, 620–629.

Moss

D. A.

(2004). When all else fails: Government as the ultimate risk manager. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Skiba

P. M.

Tobacman

(2009). Do payday loans cause bankruptcy? (Vanderbilt Law and Economics Research Paper No. 11-13). Retrieved from SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1266215

Spence

(1977). Consumer misperceptions, product failure and producer liability. The Review of Economic Studies, 44, 561–572. doi:10.2307/2296908

Wilson

B. M.

Stolarz-Fantino

(2018). Bundling the way to bankruptcy: Economic theory should inform the design of sugary-drink menus used in research. Psychological Science, 29, 1376–1379.

Wilson

B. M.

Stolarz-Fantino

Fantino

(2013). Regulating the way to obesity: Unintended consequences of limiting sugary drink sizes. PLOS ONE, 8(4), Article e61081. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0061081

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.58 MB

0.45 MB