Given previous findings from animal studies and small-scale studies in humans, variation in the μ-opioid receptor gene (OPRM1) has been proposed as a strong biological candidate for moderating sensitivity to social rejection. Using a substantially larger sample (N = 490) than previous studies, a prospective genotyping strategy, and preregistered analysis plans, we tested the hypotheses that OPRM1 variation measured by the functional A118G polymorphism (rs1799971) moderates (a) dispositional sensitivity to rejection and feelings of distress following social exclusion and (b) decision making involving social cognition. In three experimental tasks commonly used to assess altruism, reciprocity, and trust in humans, we found no evidence in favor of the hypotheses; nine main tests were preregistered, and all of them yielded small and statistically insignificant estimates. In secondary analyses, we used Bayesian inference and estimation to quantify support for our findings. Taken together, our results strongly suggest that the link between OPRM1 A118G variation and social-rejection sensitivity is weaker than previously thought.
AlmqvistC.AdamiH.-O.FranksP. W.GroopL.IngelssonE.KereJ.. . . PedersenN. L. (2011). LifeGene—A large prospective population-based study of global relevance. European Journal of Epidemiology, 26, 67–77. doi:10.1007/s10654-010-9521-x
2.
BakerM. (2016). Is there a reproducibility crisis?Nature, 533, 452–454.
3.
BarrC. S.SchwandtM. L.LindellS. G.HigleyJ. D.MaestripieriD.GoldmanD.. . . HeiligM. (2008). Variation at the mu-opioid receptor gene (OPRM1) influences attachment behavior in infant primates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 105, 5277–5281.
4.
BerensonK. R.GyurakA.AydukÖ.DowneyG.GarnerM. J.MoggK.. . . PineD. S. (2009). Rejection sensitivity and disruption of attention by social threat cues. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 1064–1072. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.07.007
5.
BergJ.DickhautJ.McCabeK. (1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10, 122–142. doi:10.1006/game.1995.1027
6.
BilbaoA.RobinsonJ. E.HeiligM.MalangaC. J.SpanagelR.SommerW. H.ThorsellA. (2015). A pharmacogenetic determinant of mu-opioid receptor antagonist effects on alcohol reward and consumption: Evidence from humanized mice. Biological Psychiatry, 77, 850–858. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.08.021
7.
BondC.LaForgeK. S.TianM.MeliaD.ZhangS.BorgL.. . . YuL. (1998). Single-nucleotide polymorphism in the human mu opioid receptor gene alters β-endorphin binding and activity: Possible implications for opiate addiction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 95, 9608–9613. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.16.9608
8.
ButtonK. S.IoannidisJ. P. A.MokryszC.NosekB. A.FlintJ.RobinsonE. S. J.MunafòM. R. (2013). Power failure: Why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14, 365–376. doi:10.1038/nrn3475
9.
Clark-PolnerE.WagerT. D.SatputeA. B.BarrettL. F. (2016). Neural fingerprinting: Meta-analysis, variation, and the search for brain-based essences in the science of emotion. In BarrettL. F.LewisM.Haviland-JonesJ. M. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (4th ed., pp. 146–165). New York, NY: Guilford.
CraigA. D. (2002). How do you feel? Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 655–666. doi:10.1038/nrn894
12.
EisenbergerN. I. (2012). The pain of social disconnection: Examining the shared neural underpinnings of physical and social pain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13, 421–434. doi:10.1038/nrn3231
13.
EisenbergerN. I.LiebermanM. D. (2004). Why rejection hurts: A common neural alarm system for physical and social pain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 294–300. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.05.010
14.
EisenbergerN. I.LiebermanM. D.WilliamsK. D. (2003). Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302, 290–292.
15.
EngelC. (2011). Dictator games: A meta study. Experimental Economics, 14, 583–610. doi:10.1007/s10683-011-9283-7
16.
ForsytheR.HorowitzJ. L.SavinN. E.SeftonM. (1994). Fairness in simple bargaining experiments. Games and Economic Behavior, 6, 347–369. doi:10.1006/game.1994.1021
17.
GüthW.KocherM. G. (2014). More than thirty years of ultimatum bargaining experiments: Motives, variations, and a survey of the recent literature. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 108, 396–409. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2014.06.006
18.
GüthW.SchmittbergerR.SchwarzeB. (1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 3, 367–388. doi:10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7
HsuD. T.SanfordB. J.MeyersK. K.LoveT. M.HazlettK. E.WangH.. . . ZubietaJ. K. (2013). Response of the μ-opioid system to social rejection and acceptance. Molecular Psychiatry, 18, 1211–1217. doi:10.1038/mp.2013.96
21.
HwangI. C.ParkJ.-Y.MyungS.-K.AhnH. Y.FukudaK.-i.LiaoQ. (2014). OPRM1 A118G gene variant and postoperative opioid requirement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesthesiology, 121, 825–834. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000000405
22.
IoannidisJ. P. A. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLOS Medicine, 2(8), Article e124. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
23.
JASP Team. (2018). JASP (Version 0.9.1) [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://jasp-stats.org/
24.
JohnsonN. D.MislinA. A. (2011). Trust games: A meta-analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 32, 865–889. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2011.05.007
25.
KosoyR.NassirR.TianC.WhiteP. A.ButlerL. M.SilvaG.. . . SeldinM. F. (2009). Ancestry informative marker sets for determining continental origin and admixture proportions in common populations in America. Human Mutation, 30, 69–78. doi:10.1002/humu.20822
26.
KrossE.BermanM. G.MischelW.SmithE. E.WagerT. D. (2011). Social rejection shares somatosensory representations with physical pain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 108, 6270–6275.
27.
KrossE.EgnerT.OchsnerK.HirschJ.DowneyG. (2007). Neural dynamics of rejection sensitivity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 945–956. doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.6.945
28.
LeeM. D.WagenmakersE. J. (2013). Bayesian cognitive modeling: A practical course. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
29.
LiebermanM. D.EisenbergerN. I. (2015). The dorsal anterior cingulate cortex is selective for pain: Results from large-scale reverse inference. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 112, 15250–15255.
30.
MachinA. J.DunbarR. (2011). The brain opioid theory of social attachment: A review of the evidence. Behaviour, 148, 985–1025. doi:10.1163/000579511X596624
31.
MehrabianA. (1994). Evidence bearing on the Affiliative Tendency (MAFF) and Sensitivity to Rejection (MSR) scales. Current Psychology, 13, 97–116. doi:10.1007/BF02686794
32.
MunafòM. R.NosekB. A.BishopD. V. M.ButtonK. S.ChambersC. D.PercieduSertN.. . . IoannidisJ. P. A. (2017). A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature Human Behaviour, 1, Article 0021. doi:10.1038/s41562-016-0021
33.
Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349, Article aac4716. doi:10.1126/science.aac4716
34.
PattersonN.PriceA. L.ReichD. (2006). Population structure and eigenanalysis. PLOS Genetics, 2(12), Article e190. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020190
35.
PeriniI.GustafssonP. A.HamiltonJ. P.KämpeR.ZetterqvistM.HeiligM. (2018). The salience of self, not social pain, is encoded by dorsal anterior cingulate and insula. Scientific Reports, 8(1), Article 6165. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-24658-8
36.
RamchandaniV. A.UmhauJ.PavonF. J.Ruiz-VelascoV.MargasW.SunH.. . . HeiligM. (2010). A genetic determinant of the striatal dopamine response to alcohol in men. Molecular Psychiatry, 16, 809–817. doi:10.1038/mp.2010.56
37.
RobinsonJ. E.VardyE.DiBertoJ. F.CheferV. I.WhiteK. L.FishE. W.. . . MalangaC. J. (2015). Receptor reserve moderates mesolimbic responses to opioids in a humanized mouse model of the OPRM1 A118G polymorphism. Neuropsychopharmacology, 40, 2614–2622. doi:10.1038/npp.2015.109
38.
TorreJ. B.LiebermanM. D. (2018). Putting feelings into words: Affect labeling as implicit emotion regulation. Emotion Review, 10, 116–124. doi:10.1177/1754073917742706
39.
WagerT. D.AtlasL. Y.BotvinickM. M.ChangL. J.CoghillR. C.DavisK. D.. . . YarkoniT. (2016). Pain in the ACC?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 113, E2474–E2475.
40.
WayB. M.TaylorS. E.EisenbergerN. I. (2009). Variation in the μ-opioid receptor gene (OPRM1) is associated with dispositional and neural sensitivity to social rejection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106, 15079–15084. doi:10.1073/pnas.0812612106
41.
WilliamsK. D.CheungC. K. T.ChoiW. (2000). Cyberostracism: Effects of being ignored over the Internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 748–762. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.748
42.
WooC.-W.KobanL.KrossE.LindquistM. A.BanichM. T.RuzicL.. . . WagerT. D. (2014). Separate neural representations for physical pain and social rejection. Nature Communications, 5, Article 5380. doi:10.1038/ncomms6380
43.
ZadroL.WilliamsK. D.RichardsonR. (2004). How low can you go? Ostracism by a computer is sufficient to lower self-reported levels of belonging, control, self-esteem, and meaningful existence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 560–567. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2003.11.006
44.
ZhangY.WangD.JohnsonA. D.PappA. C.SadéeW. (2005). Allelic expression imbalance of human mu opioid receptor (OPRM1) caused by variant A118G. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 280, 32618–32624. doi:10.1074/jbc.M504942200
45.
ZubietaJ.KetterT. A.BuellerJ. A.XuY.KilbournM. R.YoungE. A.KoeppeR. A. (2003). Regulation of human affective responses by anterior cingulate and limbic µ-opioid neurotransmission. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60, 1145–1153. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.60.11.1145
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
