Can implicit bias be changed? In a recent longitudinal study, Lai and colleagues (2016, Study 2) compared nine interventions intended to reduce racial bias across 18 university campuses. Although all interventions changed participants’ bias on an immediate test, none were effective after a delay. This study has been interpreted as strong evidence that implicit biases are difficult to change. We revisited Lai et al.’s study to test whether the stability observed reflected persistent individual attitudes or stable environments. Our reanalysis (N = 4,842) indicates that individual biases did not return to preexisting levels. Instead, campus means returned to preexisting campus means, whereas individual scores fluctuated mostly randomly. Campus means were predicted by markers of structural inequality. Our results are consistent with the theory that implicit bias reflects biases in the environment rather than individual dispositions. This conclusion is nearly the opposite of the original interpretation: Although social environments are stable, individual implicit biases are ephemeral.
AcharyaA.BlackwellM.SenM. (2018). Deep roots: How slavery still shapes southern politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
2.
AndersonC. (2016). White rage: The unspoken truth of our racial divide. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Publishing.
3.
BaileyZ. D.KriegerN.AgénorM.GravesJ.LinosN.BassettM. T. (2017). Structural racism and health inequities in the USA: Evidence and interventions. The Lancet, 389, 1453–1463. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30569-X
4.
BarghJ. A. (1999). The cognitive monster: The case against the controllability of automatic stereotype effects. In ChaikenS.TropeY. (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 361–382). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
BlairI. V. (2002). The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 242–261. doi:10.1207/S15327957PSPR0603_8
7.
CameronC. D.Brown-IannuzziJ. L.PayneB. K. (2012). Sequential priming measures of implicit social cognition: A meta-analysis of associations with behavior and explicit attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16, 330–350. doi:10.1177/1088868312440047
8.
ChettyR.FriedmanJ. N.SaezE.TurnerN.YaganD. (2017). Mobility report cards: The role of colleges in intergenerational mobility (NBER Working Paper No. 23618). Retrieved from https://www.nber.org/papers/w23618.pdf
DasguptaN. (2013). Implicit attitudes and beliefs adapt to situations: A decade of research on the malleability of implicit prejudice, stereotypes, and self-concept. In DevineP.PlantA. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 47, pp. 233–279). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00005-X
11.
DevineP. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5–18. doi:10.1037/0022-3514 .56.1.5
12.
FazioR. H.JacksonJ. R.DuntonB. C.WilliamsC. J. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1013–1027. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1013
13.
FazioR. H.OlsonM. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297–327. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225
14.
FazioR. H.WilliamsC. J. (1986). Attitude accessibility as a moderator of the attitude–perception and attitude–behavior relations: An investigation of the 1984 presidential election. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 505–514. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.3.505
15.
FiedlerK.MessnerC.BluemkeM. (2006). Unresolved problems with the “I”, the “A”, and the “T”: A logical and psychometric critique of the implicit association test (IAT). European Review of Social Psychology, 17, 74–147. doi:10.1080/10463280600681248
16.
ForscherP. S.LaiC. K.AxtJ. R.EbersoleC. R.HermanM.DevineP. G.NosekB. A. (2017). A meta-analysis of procedures to change implicit measures. Retrieved from PsyArXiv: psyarxiv.com/dv8tu
17.
GawronskiB.BodenhausenG. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 692–731. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.692
18.
GawronskiB.MorrisonM.PhillsC. E.GaldiS. (2017). Temporal stability of implicit and explicit measures: A longitudinal analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 300–312. doi:10.1177/0146167216684131
19.
GreenwaldA. G.BanajiM. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4–27. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.4
20.
GreenwaldA. G.PoehlmanT. A.UhlmannE. L.BanajiM. R. (2009). Understanding and using the implicit association test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 17–41. doi:10.1037/a0015575
21.
HehmanE.CalanchiniJ.FlakeJ. K.LeitnerJ. B. (2018). Establishing construct validity evidence for region-level measures of explicit and implicit racial bias. Manuscript submitted for publication.
22.
HehmanE.FlakeJ. K.CalanchiniJ. (2018). Disproportionate use of lethal force in policing is associated with regional racial biases of residents. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 9, 393–401. doi:10.1177/1948550617711229
23.
HigginsE. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In HigginsE. T.KruglanskiA. W. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133–168). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
24.
KriegerN. (2012). Methods for the scientific study of discrimination and health: An ecosocial approach. American Journal of Public Health, 102, 936–944.
25.
KurdiB.BanajiM. R. (2017). Reports of the death of the individual difference approach to implicit social cognition may be greatly exaggerated: A commentary on Payne, Vuletich, and Lundberg. Psychological Inquiry, 28, 281–287. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2017.1373555
26.
LaiC. K.HoffmanK. M.NosekB. A. (2013). Reducing implicit prejudice. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 315–330. doi:10.1111/spc3.12023
27.
LaiC. K.SkinnerA. L.CooleyE.MurrarS.BrauerM.DevosT.. . . NosekB. A. (2016). Reducing implicit racial preferences: II. Intervention effectiveness across time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145, 1001–1016. doi:10.1037/xge0000179
28.
LeitnerJ. B.HehmanE.AydukO.Mendoza-DentonR. (2016). Racial bias is associated with ingroup death rate for Blacks and Whites: Insights from Project Implicit. Social Science & Medicine, 170, 220–227. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.10.007
29.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2019). The Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/use-the-data
30.
OrchardJ.PriceJ. (2017). County-level racial prejudice and the Black-White gap in infant health outcomes. Social Science & Medicine, 181, 191–198. doi:10.1016/j.socsc imed.2017.03.036
31.
OswaldF. L.MitchellG.BlantonH.JaccardJ.TetlockP. E. (2013). Predicting ethnic and racial discrimination: A meta-analysis of IAT criterion studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 171–192. doi:10.1037/a0032734
32.
PayneB. K.ChengC. M.GovorunO.StewartB. D. (2005). An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 277–293. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.277
33.
PayneB. K.GawronskiB. (2010). A history of implicit social cognition: Where is it coming from? Where is it now? Where is it going? In GawronskiB.PayneB. K. (Eds.), Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications (pp. 1–15). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
34.
PayneB. K.VuletichH. A.Brown-IannuzziJ. L. (in press). Historical roots of implicit bias in slavery. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA.
35.
PayneB. K.VuletichH. A.LundbergK. B. (2017). The bias of crowds: How implicit bias bridges personal and systemic prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 28, 233–248. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2017.1335568
36.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
37.
RothsteinR. (2017). The color of law: A forgotten history of how our government segregated America. New York, NY: Liveright Publishing Corp.
38.
SrullT. K.WyerR. S. (1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1660–1672. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.10.1660
39.
SurowieckiJ. (2004). The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies, and nations. New York, NY: Random House.
40.
WilsonT. D.LindseyS.SchoolerT. Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107, 101–126. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.107.1.101
41.
XuK.NosekB.GreenwaldA. G. (2014). Psychology data from the Race Implicit Association Test on the Project Implicit Demo website. Journal of Open Psychology Data, 2(1), Article e3. doi:10.5334/jopd.ac
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
