A four-wave survey on a national probabilistic sample (N = 17,399) tested novel predictions about how positive and negative contact with racial out-groups predicts warmth and anger toward those groups. Three competing hypotheses were tested: (a) that negative contact will outweigh positive contact when predicting both emotions (“bad is stronger than good”); (b) that negative and positive contact will similarly predict each emotion; and (c) that negative contact will have a disproportionately large association with anger (a negative emotion), whereas positive contact will have a disproportionately large association with warmth (a positive emotion)—a phenomenon known as affect matching. The data revealed clear evidence for affect matching: Negative contact was associated with high levels of anger more than low levels of warmth, whereas positive contact was associated with high levels of warmth more than low levels of anger. Results suggest that positive and negative feelings about out-groups may be tied to qualitatively distinct contact experiences.
AbersonC. L. (2015). Positive intergroup contact, negative intergroup contact, and threat as predictors of cognitive and affective dimensions of prejudice. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 18, 743–760.
2.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3.
ÁrnadóttirK.LolliotS.BrownR.HewstoneM. (2018). Positive and negative intergroup contact: Interaction not asymmetry. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 784–800.
4.
BarlowF. K.PaoliniS.PedersenA.HornseyM. J.RadkeH. R.HarwoodJ.. . . SibleyC. G. (2012). The contact caveat: Negative contact predicts increased prejudice more than positive contact predicts reduced prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1629–1643.
5.
BaumeisterR. F.BratslavskyE.FinkenauerC.VohsK. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323–370.
6.
BeckerJ. C.WrightS. C.LubenskyM. E.ZhouS. (2013). Friend or ally: Whether cross-group contact undermines collective action depends on what advantaged group members say (or don’t say). Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 442–455.
7.
BemS. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155–162.
8.
BerryD.WilloughbyM. T. (2017). On the practical interpretability of cross-lagged panel models: Rethinking a developmental workhorse. Child Development, 88, 1186–1206.
9.
BowerG. H. (1981). Mood and memory. American Psychologist, 36, 129–148.
10.
BrewerM. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love and outgroup hate?Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429–444.
11.
CacioppoJ. T.BerntsonG. G. (1994). Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 401–423.
12.
CernatV. (2017). Trajectories of interethnic contact and prejudice in a four-waves study of Romanian teenager–parent pairs. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 43, 2669–2687.
13.
CurranP. J.HowardA. L.BainterS. A.LaneS. T.McGinleyJ. S. (2014). The separation of between-person and within-person components of individual change over time: A latent curve model with structured residuals. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82, 879–894.
14.
DishionT. J.AndrewsD. W.CrosbyL. (1995). Antisocial boys and their friends in early adolescence: Relationship characteristics, quality, and interactional process. Child Development, 66, 139–151.
15.
DixonJ.LevineM.ReicherS.DurrheimK. (2012). Beyond prejudice: Are negative evaluations the problem and is getting us to like one another more the solution?Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 35, 411–425.
16.
FiskeS. T.CuddyA. J.GlickP.XuJ. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902.
17.
GaertnerS. L.DovidioJ. F. (1986). The aversive form of racism. In DovidioJ. F.GaertnerS. L. (Eds.), Prejudice, discrimination, and racism (pp. 61–89). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
18.
GasperK.DanubeC. L. (2016). The scope of our affective influences: When and how naturally occurring positive, negative, and neutral affects alter judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 385–399.
19.
Giner-SorollaR. (2013). Judging passions: Moral emotions in persons and groups. East Sussex, England: Psychology Press.
20.
GlickP.FiskeS. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.
21.
GoldsteinM. D.StrubeM. J. (1994). Independence revisited: The relation between positive and negative affect in a naturalistic setting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 57–64.
22.
GottmanJ. M.KrokoffL. J. (1989). Marital interaction and satisfaction: A longitudinal view. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 57, 47–52.
23.
GrafS.PaoliniS.RubinM. (2014). Negative intergroup contact is more influential, but positive intergroup contact is more common: Assessing contact prominence and contact prevalence in five Central European countries. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 536–547.
24.
HamakerE. L.KuiperR. M.GrasmanR. P. (2015). A critique of the cross-lagged panel model. Psychological Methods, 20, 102–116.
25.
HaywardL. E.TroppL. R.HornseyM. J.BarlowF. K. (2017). Toward a comprehensive understanding of intergroup contact: Descriptions and mediators of positive and negative contact among majority and minority groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 347–364.
26.
HaywardL. E.TroppL. R.HornseyM. J.BarlowF. K. (2018). How negative contact and positive contact with Whites predict collective action among racial and ethnic minorities. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57, 1–20.
27.
HuntsingerJ. R. (2013). Affective incoherence reduces reliance on activated stereotypes. Social Cognition, 31, 405–416.
28.
InglehartR.NorrisP. (2016). Trump, Brexit, and the rise of populism: Economic have-nots and cultural backlash (HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series No. RWP16-026). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Kennedy School.
29.
MackieD. M.DevosT.SmithE. R. (2000). Intergroup emotions: Explaining offensive action tendencies in an intergroup context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 602–616.
30.
MajorB.ZubekJ. M.CooperM. L.CozzarelliC.RichardsC. (1997). Mixed messages: Implications of social conflict and social support within close relationships for adjustment to a stressful life event. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1349–1363.
31.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
32.
OhH. J.OzkayaE.LaRoseR. (2014). How does online social networking enhance life satisfaction? The relationships among online supportive interaction, affect, perceived social support, sense of community, and life satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 69–78.
33.
PaoliniS.HarwoodJ.RubinM. (2010). Negative intergroup contact makes group memberships salient: Explaining why intergroup conflict endures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1723–1738.
34.
PettigrewT. F.TroppL. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783.
35.
PutnamR. D. (2007). E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize lecture. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30, 137–174.
36.
ReimerN. K.BeckerJ. C.BenzA.ChristO.DhontK.KlockeU.. . . HewstoneM. (2017). Intergroup contact and social change: Implications of negative and positive contact for collective action in advantaged and disadvantaged groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43, 121–136.
37.
SchusterT. L.KesslerR. C.AseltineR. H. (1990). Supportive interactions, negative interactions, and depressed mood. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 423–438.
38.
TroppL. R.BarlowF. K. (2018). Making advantaged racial groups care about inequality: Intergroup contact as a route to psychological investment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27, 194–199.
39.
TroppL. R.PettigrewT. F. (2005). Relationships between intergroup contact and prejudice among minority and majority status groups. Psychological Science, 16, 951–957.
40.
VisintinE. P.VociA.PagottoL.HewstoneM. (2016). Direct, extended, and mass-mediated contact with immigrants in Italy: Their associations with emotions, prejudice, and humanity perceptions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 4, 175–194.
41.
ZautraA. J.ReichJ. W. (1983). Life events and perceptions of life quality: Developments in a two-factor approach. Journal of Community Psychology, 11, 121–132.
42.
ZieglerR. (2010). Mood, source characteristics, and message processing: A mood-congruent expectancies approach. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 743–752.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
