A Facial-Action Imposter: How Head Tilt Influences Perceptions of Dominance From a Neutral Face

Abstract

Research on face perception tends to focus on facial morphology and the activation of facial muscles while ignoring any impact of head position. We raise questions about this approach by demonstrating that head movements can dramatically shift the appearance of the face to shape social judgments without engaging facial musculature. In five studies (total N = 1,517), we found that when eye gaze was directed forward, tilting one’s head downward (compared with a neutral angle) increased perceptions of dominance, and this effect was due to the illusory appearance of lowered and V-shaped eyebrows caused by a downward head tilt. Tilting one’s head downward therefore functions as an action-unit imposter, creating the artificial appearance of a facial action unit that has a strong effect on social perception. Social judgments about faces are therefore driven not only by facial shape and musculature but also by movements in the face’s physical foundation: the head.

Keywords

face perception nonverbal behavior social perception dominance head tilt open data preregistered

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Blaker

N. M.

van Vugt

(2014). The status-size hypothesis: How cues of physical size and social status influence each other. In Cheng

J. T.

Tracy

J. L.

Anderson

(Eds.), The psychology of social status (pp. 119–137). New York, NY: Springer.

Cheng

J. T.

Tracy

J. L.

Foulsham

Kingstone

Henrich

(2013). Two ways to the top: Evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 103–125.

Cheng

J. T.

Tracy

J. L.

Henrich

(2010). Pride, personality, and the evolutionary foundations of human social status. Evolution & Human Behavior, 31, 334–347.

Cunningham

D. W.

Wallraven

(2009). Dynamic information for the recognition of conversational expressions. Journal of Vision, 9(13), Article 7. doi:10.1167/9.13.7

de la Rosa

Giese

Bülthoff

H. H.

Curio

(2013). The contribution of different cues of facial movement to the emotional facial expression adaptation aftereffect. Journal of Vision, 13(1), Article 23. doi:10.1167/13.1.23

Ekman

Friesen

W. V.

(1978). Facial Action Coding System: The manual. Salt Lake City, UT: Research Nexus.

Ekman

Oster

(1979). Facial expressions of emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 30, 527–554.

Geniole

S. N.

Denson

T. F.

Dixson

B. J.

Carré

J. M.

McCormick

C. M.

(2015). Evidence from meta-analyses of the facial width-to-height ratio as an evolved cue of threat. PLOS ONE, 10(7), Article e0132726. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0132726

Hareli

Shomrat

Hess

(2009). Emotional versus neutral expressions and perceptions of social dominance and submissiveness. Emotion, 9, 378–384.

10.

Hehman

Leitner

J. B.

Gaertner

S. L.

(2013). Enhancing static facial features increases intimidation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 747–754.

11.

Kappas

Hess

Barr

C. L.

Kleck

R. E.

(1994). Angle of regard: The effect of vertical viewing angle on the perception of facial expressions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 18, 263–280.

12.

Keating

C. F.

Bai

D. L.

(1986). Children’s attributions of social dominance from facial cues. Child Development, 57, 1269–1276.

13.

Keltner

(1995). Signs of appeasement: Evidence for the distinct displays of embarrassment, amusement, and shame. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 441–454.

14.

Knutson

(1996). Facial expressions of emotion influence interpersonal trait inferences. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 20, 165–182.

15.

Kosinski

(2017). Facial width-to-height ratio does not predict self-reported behavioral tendencies. Psychological Science, 28, 1675–1682.

16.

Langner

Dotsch

Bijlstra

Wigboldus

D. H.

Hawk

S. T.

van Knippenberg

A. D.

(2010). Presentation and validation of the Radboud Faces Database. Cognition & Emotion, 24, 1377–1388.

17.

Lyons

M. J.

Campbell

Plante

Coleman

Kamachi

Akamatsu

(2000). The Noh mask effect: Vertical viewpoint dependence of facial expression perception. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 267, 2239–2245.

18.

Marsh

A. A.

H. H.

Schechter

J. C.

Blair

R. J.

(2009). Larger than life: Humans’ nonverbal status cues alter perceived size. PLOS ONE, 4(5), Article e5707. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0005707

19.

Martinez

A. M.

(2017). Visual perception of facial expressions of emotion. Current Opinion in Psychology, 17, 27–33.

20.

Mignault

Chaudhuri

(2003). The many faces of a neutral face: Head tilt and perception of dominance and emotion. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27, 111–132.

21.

Morris

S. B.

(2008). Estimating effect sizes from pretest-posttest-control group designs. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 364–386.

22.

Neth

Martinez

A. M.

(2009). Emotion perception in emotionless face images suggests a norm-based representation. Journal of Vision, 9(1), Article 5. doi:10.1167/9.1.5

23.

Olszanowski

Pochwatko

Kuklinski

Scibor-Rylski

Lewinski

Ohme

R. K.

(2015). Warsaw set of emotional facial expression pictures: A validation study of facial display photographs. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 1516. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01516

24.

Rule

N. O.

Adams

R. B.

Jr. Ambady

Freeman

J. B.

(2012). Perceptions of dominance following glimpses of faces and bodies. Perception, 41, 687–706.

25.

Schmid-Mast

M. S.

Hall

J. A.

(2004). Who is the boss and who is not? Accuracy of judging status. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 28, 145–165.

26.

Shariff

A. F.

Tracy

J. L.

(2009). Knowing who’s boss: Implicit perceptions of status from the nonverbal expression of pride. Emotion, 9, 631–639.

27.

Smith Micro. (2014). Poser Pro 2014 [Computer software]. Watsonville, CA: Author.

28.

Spencer

S. J.

Zanna

M. P.

Fong

G. T.

(2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 845–851.

29.

Toscano

Schubert

T. W.

Giessner

S. R.

(2018). Eye gaze and head posture jointly influence judgments of dominance, physical strength, and anger. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 42, 285–309.

30.

Toscano

Schubert

T. W.

Sell

A. N.

(2014). Judgments of dominance from the face track physical strength. Evolutionary Psychology, 12(1). doi:10.1177/147470491401200101

31.

Tracy

J. L.

Robins

R. W.

(2008). The automaticity of emotion recognition. Emotion, 8, 81–95.

32.

Tracy

J. L.

Robins

R. W.

Schriber

R. A.

(2009). Development of a FACS-verified set of basic and self-conscious emotion expressions. Emotion, 9, 554–559.

33.

Witkower

Hill

Pun

Baron

Tracy

J. L.

(2019). Two cross-cultural and early-emerging signals of social rank: Prestige and dominance are associated with distinct nonverbal displays across diverse populations and among young children. Manuscript in preparation.

34.

Witkower

Tracy

J. L.

Cheng

J. T.

Henrich

(in press). Two signals of social rank: Prestige and dominance are associated with distinct nonverbal displays. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

35.

Witkower

Tracy

J. L.

Lange

(2019). Illuminating the schade: Uncovering a distinct expression of schadenfreude. Manuscript in preparation.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.62 MB

0.59 MB