Psychological investigations into the structure of well-being have been largely cross-sectional. However, longitudinal models are needed as Western societies work to improve individual well-being. The current multilevel-modeling study examined within-person dynamics of well-being over 8 years. I asked two questions: (a) How do life satisfaction and psychological well-being (measures drawn from two well-being research traditions) relate over time? and (b) do these relationships vary on the basis of individuals’ extraversion or neuroticism? Measures of life satisfaction and psychological well-being were collected in 8 consecutive years from 159 American adults in late midlife. A dispositional-life-satisfaction set point and yearly variation in life satisfaction both related to higher yearly psychological well-being. Neuroticism, but not extraversion, predicted a stronger within-person relationship between life satisfaction and psychological well-being. For participants with very low neuroticism, life satisfaction and psychological well-being varied independently. In sum, experiences of life satisfaction and psychological well-being converged for more neurotic individuals and diverged for more emotionally stable participants.
BatesD.MächlerM.BolkerB.WalkerS. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1).doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01
2.
BradburnN. M. (1969). The structure of psychological well-being. Oxford, England: Aldine Publishing.
3.
BreyP. (2014). Well-being in philosophy, psychology and economics. In BreyP.BriggleA.SpendeE. (Eds.), The good life in a technological age (pp. 15–34). London, England: Routledge.
4.
BrickmanP. D.CampbellD. T. (1971). Hedonic relativism and planning the good society. In AppleyM. H. (Ed.), Adaptation-level theory (pp. 287–302). New York, NY: Academic Press.
5.
CampbellJ. D.AssanandS.PaulaA. D. (2003). The structure of the self-concept and its relation to psychological adjustment. Journal of Personality, 71, 115–140. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.t01-1-00002
6.
ChenF. F.JingY.HayesA.LeeJ. M. (2013). Two concepts or two approaches? A bifactor analysis of psychological and subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 1033–1068. doi:10.1007/s10902-012-9367-x
7.
CostaP. T.Jr.McCraeR. R. (1992). NEO Personality Inventory–Revised (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
8.
de BruinG. P.du PlessisG. A. (2015). Bifactor analysis of the Mental Health Continuum–Short Form (MHC-SF). Psychological Reports, 116, 438–446. doi:10.2466/03.02.PR0.116k20w6
9.
DeNeveK. M.CooperH. (1998). The happy personality: A meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 197–229. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.197
DienerE.EmmonsR. A.LarsenR. J.GriffinS. (1985). The Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
12.
DisabatoD. J.GoodmanF. R.KashdanT. B.ShortJ. L.JardenA. (2016). Different types of well-being? A cross-cultural examination of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Psychological Assessment, 28, 471–482. doi:10.1037/pas0000209
13.
DziakJ. J.CoffmanD. L.LanzaS. T.LiR. (2012). Sensitivity and specificity of information criteria. PeerJ Preprints. doi:10.7287/peerj.preprints.1103v2
14.
EidM.DienerE. (2004). Global judgments of subjective well-being: Situational variability and long-term stability. Social Indicators Research, 65, 245–277. doi:10.1023/B:SOCI.0000003801.89195.bc
15.
GallagherM. W.LopezS. J.PreacherK. J. (2009). The hierarchical structure of well-being. Journal of Personality, 77, 1025–1050. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00573.x
16.
JoshanlooM. (2016). Revisiting the empirical distinction between hedonic and eudaimonic aspects of well-being using exploratory structural equation modeling. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 2023–2036. doi:10.1007/s10902-015-9683-z
17.
JovanovićV. (2015). Structural validity of the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form: The bifactor model of emotional, social and psychological well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 75, 154–159. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.026
18.
KahnemanD.DienerE.SchwarzN. (1999). Well-being: Foundations of hedonic psychology. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
19.
KeyesC. L. M.ShmotkinD.RyffC. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 1007–1022. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.1007
KreftI. G. G.de LeeuwJ.AikenL. S. (1995). The effect of different forms of centering in hierarchical linear models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 1–21. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3001_1
22.
KusnetsovaA.BrockhoffP. B.ChristensenR. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13). doi:10.18637/jss.v082.i13
23.
LongoY.CoyneI.JosephS.GustavssonP. (2016). Support for a general factor of well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 100, 68–72. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.082
24.
MaasC. J. M.HoxJ. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology, 1(3), 86–92. doi:10.1027/1614-2241.1.3.86
25.
Marketdata Enterprises. (2017). The U.S. market for self-improvement products & services (No. 11). Tampa, FL: Author.
26.
McAdamsD. P.GuoJ. (2015). Narrating the generative life. Psychological Science, 26, 475–483. doi:10.1177/0956797614568318
27.
MroczekD.SpiroA. (2005). Change in life satisfaction during adulthood: Findings from the Veterans Affairs Normative Aging Study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 189–202.
28.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2017). How’s life? 2017: Measuring well-being. Paris, France: Author.
29.
PreacherK. J.CurranP. J.BauerD. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437–448. doi:10.3102/10769986031004437
30.
R Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
31.
ReadyR. E.ÅkerstedtA. M.MroczekD. K. (2012). Emotional complexity and emotional well-being in older adults: Risks of high neuroticism. Aging & Mental Health, 16, 17–26. doi:10.1080/13607863.2011.602961
32.
RyanR.DeciE. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141
33.
RyffC. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081.
34.
SatterthwaiteF. E. (1946). An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. Biometrics Bulletin, 2, 110–114. doi:10.2307/3002019
35.
ScherbaumC. A.FerreterJ. M. (2009). Estimating statistical power and required sample sizes for organizational research using multilevel modeling. Organizational Research Methods, 12, 347–367. doi:10.1177/1094428107308906
36.
SchimmackU.RadhakrishnanP.OishiS.DzokotoV.AhadiS. (2002). Culture, personality, and subjective well-being: Integrating process models of life satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 582–593. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.4.582
37.
Schotanus-DijkstraM.PieterseM. E.DrossaertC. H. C.WesterhofG. J.de GraafR.ten HaveM.. . . BohlmeijerE. T. (2015). What factors are associated with flourishing? Results from a large representative national sample. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17, 1351–1370. doi:10.1007/s10902-015-9647-3
38.
SkalinaL. M.GunthertK. C.AhrensA. H.WenzeS. J. (2015). Neuroticism and momentary differentiation of positive and negative affect. Personality and Individual Differences, 75, 165–169. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.018
39.
SnijdersT. A.BoskerR. J. (2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
40.
SuhE.DienerE.OishiS.TriandisH. C. (1998). The shifting basis of life satisfaction judgments across cultures: Emotions versus norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 482–493.
41.
WestS. G.RyuE.KwokO.ChamH. (2011). Multilevel modeling: Current and future applications in personality research. Journal of Personality, 79, 2–50. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00681.x
42.
World Health Organization. (2013). Health 2020: A European policy framework supporting action across government and society for health and well-being. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
