A meal naturally brings people together, but does the way a meal is served and consumed further matter for cooperation between people? This research (N = 1,476) yielded evidence that it does. People eating from shared plates (i.e., a Chinese-style meal) cooperated more in social dilemmas and negotiations than those eating from separate plates. Specifically, sharing food from a single plate increased perceived coordination among diners, which in turn led them to behave more cooperatively and less competitively toward each other, compared with individuals eating the same food from separate plates. The effect of sharing a plate on cooperation occurred among strangers, which suggests that sharing plates can bring together more than just allies.
AarøeL.PetersenM. B. (2013). Hunger games: Fluctuations in blood glucose levels influence support for social welfare. Psychological Science, 24, 2550–2556.
2.
BarghJ. A.ChartrandT. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462–479.
3.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P.RothsteinH. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
4.
CohenJ. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.
5.
FawcettC. A.MarksonL. (2010). Similarity predicts liking in 3-year-old children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105, 345–358.
6.
GilderT. S.HeereyE. A. (2018). The role of experimenter belief in social priming. Psychological Science, 29, 403–417.
7.
HaidtJ.SederJ. P.KesebirS. (2008). Hive psychology, happiness, and public policy. The Journal of Legal Studies, 37(S2), S133–S156.
8.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
9.
HemesathM.PomponioX. (1998). Cooperation and culture: Students from China and the United States in a prisoner’s dilemma. Cross-Cultural Research, 32, 171–184.
10.
HerrP. M. (1986). Consequences of priming: Judgment and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1106–1115.
11.
HigginsJ. P. T.GreenS. (Eds.). (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions Version 5.1.0. Retrieved from The Cochrane Collaboration: http://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org/
12.
JeffreysH. (1961). The theory of probability. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
13.
KaganS.KnightG. P. (1979). Cooperation-competition and self-esteem: A case of cultural relativism. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 10, 457–467.
14.
KnezM.CamererC. (2000). Increasing cooperation in prisoner’s dilemmas by establishing a precedent of efficiency in coordination games. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 194–216.
15.
KniffinK. M.WansinkB. (2012). It’s not just lunch: Extra-pair commensality can trigger sexual jealousy. PLOS ONE, 7(7), Article e40445. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0040445
16.
LaxD. A.WeeksT. T. (1985). Leckenby Co. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Publishing.
17.
LibermanZ.WoodwardA. L.SullivanK. R.KinzlerK. D. (2016). Early emerging system for reasoning about the social nature of food. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 113, 9480–9485.
18.
McClintockC. G. (1974). Development of social motives in Anglo-American and Mexican-American children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 348–354.
19.
McNeillW. H. (1995). Keeping together in time: Dance and drill in human history. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20.
MillerL.RozinP.FiskeA. P. (1998). Food sharing and feeding another person suggest intimacy; two studies of American college students. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28, 423–436.
MorrisM. W.MenonT.AmesD. R. (2001). Culturally conferred conceptions of agency: A key to social perception of persons, groups, and other actors. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 169–182.
23.
NeubergS. L. (1988). Behavioral implications of information presented outside of conscious awareness: The effect of subliminal presentation of trait information on behavior in the prisoner’s dilemma game. Social Cognition, 6, 207–230.
24.
ParksC. D.VuA. D. (1994). Social dilemma behavior of individuals from highly individualist and collectivist cultures. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 38, 708–718.
25.
PetersenM. B.AarøeL.JensenN. H.CurryO. (2014). Social welfare and the psychology of food sharing: Short-term hunger increases support for social welfare. Political Psychology, 35, 757–773.
26.
ProbstT. M.CarnevaleP. J.TriandisH. C. (1999). Cultural values in intergroup and single-group social dilemmas. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 77, 171–191.
27.
RamanathanS.MenonG. (2006). Time-varying effects of chronic hedonic goals on impulsive behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 628–641.
28.
RatnerR. K.HamiltonR. W. (2015). Inhibited from bowling alone. Journal of Consumer Research, 42, 266–283.
29.
RouxC.GoldsmithK.BonezziA. (2015). On the psychology of scarcity: When reminders of resource scarcity promote selfish (and generous) behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 42, 615–631.
30.
RozinP. (2005). The meaning of food in our lives. A cross-cultural perspective on eating and well-being. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 37, S107–S112.
31.
SebanzN.BekkeringH.KnoblichG. (2006). Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 70–76.
32.
SheldonO. J.FishbachA. (2011). Resisting the temptation to compete: Self-control promotes cooperation in mixed-motive interactions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 403–410.
33.
ShteynbergG. (2015). Shared attention. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 579–590.
34.
ValdesoloP.OuyangJ.DeStenoD. (2010). The rhythm of joint action: Synchrony promotes cooperative ability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 693–695.
35.
ViechtbauerW. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3). doi:10.18637/jss.v036.i03
36.
WiltermuthS. S.HeathC. (2009). Synchrony and cooperation. Psychological Science, 20, 1–5.
37.
WoolleyK.FishbachA. (2017). A recipe for friendship: Similar food consumption promotes trust and cooperation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27, 1–10.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
