Subtle Linguistic Cues Increase Girls’ Engagement in Science

Abstract

The roots of gender disparities in science achievement take hold in early childhood. The present studies aimed to identify a modifiable feature of young children’s environments that could be targeted to reduce gender differences in science behavior among young children. Four experimental studies with children (N = 501) revealed that describing science in terms of actions (“Let’s do science! Doing science means exploring the world!”) instead of identities (“Let’s be scientists! Scientists explore the world!”) increased girls’ subsequent persistence in new science games designed to illustrate the scientific method. These studies thus identified subtle but powerful linguistic cues that could be targeted to help reduce gender disparities in science engagement in early childhood.

Keywords

cognitive development language science education sex social cognition open data open materials

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barman

C. R.

(1999). Students’ views about scientists and school science: Engaging K-8 teachers in a national study. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10, 43–54. doi:10.1023/A:1009424713416

Baron

A. S.

Dunham

Banaji

Carey

(2014). Constraints on the acquisition of social category concepts. Journal of Cognition and Development, 15, 238–268. doi:10.1080/15248372.2012.742902

Beede

Julian

Langdon

McKittrick

Khan

Doms

(2011). Women in STEM: A gender gap to innovation (ESA Issue Brief #04-11). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce.

Bian

Leslie

S. J.

Cimpian

(2017). Gender stereotypes about intellectual ability emerge early and influence children’s interests. Science, 355, 389–391. doi:10.1126/science.aah6524

Cain

K. M.

Dweck

C. S.

(1995). The relation between motivational patterns and achievement cognitions through the elementary school years. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 41, 25–52. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06197.x

Chapin

(2006). The achievement gap in social studies and science starts early: Evidence from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study. The Social Studies, 97, 231–238. doi:10.3200/TSSS.97.6.231-238

Cimpian

(2013). Generic statements, causal attributions, and children’s naive theories. In Banaji

M. R.

Gelman

S. A.

(Eds.), Navigating the social world: What infants, children, and other species can teach us (pp. 269–274). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Cimpian

Arce

H. C.

Markman

E. M.

Dweck

C. S.

(2007). Subtle linguistic cues affect children’s motivation. Psychological Science, 18, 314–316. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01896.x

Cimpian

Erickson

L. C.

(2012). Who is good at this game? Linking an activity to a social category undermines children’s achievement. Psychological Science, 23, 533–541.

10.

Dienes

(2014). Using Bayes to get the most out of non-significant results. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, Article 781. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00781

11.

Dweck

C. S.

(2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Random House.

12.

Eccles

Wigfield

(2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153

13.

Foster-Hanson

Cimpian

Leshin

Rhodes

(2018). Asking children to “be helpers” backfires after setbacks. Child Development. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/cdev.13147

14.

Fox

Weisberg

(2011). An R companion to applied regression (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

15.

Gelman

S. A.

(2003). The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

16.

Gelman

S. A.

Heyman

G. D.

(1999). Carrot-eaters and creature-believers: The effects of lexicalization on children’s inferences about social categories. Psychological Science, 10, 489–493. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00194

17.

Gelman

S. A.

Taylor

Nguyen

S. P.

Leaper

Bigler

R. S.

(2004). Mother-child conversations about gender: Understanding the acquisition of essentialist beliefs [Target article and commentaries]. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 69(1), 1–142. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5834.2004.06901002.x

18.

Gelman

S. A.

Ware

E. A.

Kleinberg

(2010). Effects of generic language on category content and structure. Cognitive Psychology, 61, 273–301. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.06.001

19.

Kamins

M. L.

Dweck

C. S.

(1999). Person versus process praise and criticism: Implications for contingent self-worth and coping. Developmental Psychology, 35, 835–847. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.35.3.835

20.

Knobe

Prasada

Newman

G. E.

(2013). Dual character concepts and the normative dimension of conceptual representation. Cognition, 127, 242–257. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.01.005

21.

Kruschke

J. K.

Liddell

T. M.

(2018). The Bayesian new statistics: Hypothesis testing, estimation, meta-analysis, and power analysis from a Bayesian perspective. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 178–206.

22.

Master

Cheryan

Meltzoff

A. N.

(2016). Computing whether she belongs: Stereotypes undermine girls’ interest and sense of belonging in computer science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108, 424–437. doi:10.1037/edu0000061

23.

Master

Cheryan

Meltzoff

A. N.

(2017). Social group membership increases STEM engagement among preschoolers. Developmental Psychology, 53, 201–209. doi:10.1037/dev0000195

24.

McGuire

J. T.

Kable

J. W.

(2012). Decision makers calibrate behavioral persistence on the basis of time-interval experience. Cognition, 124, 216–226. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.03.008

25.

McPherson

Park

Ito

T. A.

(2018). The role of prototype matching in science pursuits: Perceptions of scientists that are inaccurate and diverge from self-perceptions predict reduced interest in a science career. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44, 881–898. doi:10.1177/0146167217754069

26.

Newton

D. P.

Newton

L. D.

(1992). Young children’s perceptions of science and the scientist. International Journal of Science Education, 14, 331–348. doi:10.1080/0950069980200909

27.

Nosek

B. A.

Smyth

F. L.

Sriram

Lindner

N. M.

Devos

Ayala

. . . Greenwald

A. G.

(2009). National differences in gender–science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106, 10593–10597. doi:10.1073/pnas.0809921106

28.

NYC Department of Education. (2018). PK–8 science scope & sequence 2018. Retrieved from https://www.weteachnyc.org/media2016/filer_public/c8/f8/c8f8c331-596f-4705-b445-b35dc3e2adb3/science_scope_and_sequence.pdf

29.

Park

Schaeffer

M. W.

Nolla

K. M.

Levine

S. C.

Beilock

S. L.

(2017). How do generic statements impact performance? Evidence for entity beliefs. Developmental Science, 20(2), Article e12396. doi:10.1111/desc.12396

30.

Rattan

Good

Dweck

C. S.

(2012). It’s ok, not everyone can be good at math: Instructors with an entity theory comfort (and demotivate) students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 731–737. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.12.012

31.

R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org

32.

Rhodes

Bushara

(2015). Learning about science and self: A partnership between the Children’s Museum of Manhattan and the Psychology Department at New York University. In Sobel

Jipson

(Eds.), Fostering cognitive development in children’s museums (pp. 104–119). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

33.

Rhodes

Leslie

S.-J.

(2018). Children’s media communicates essentialist views of science and scientists. Retrieved from PsyArXiv website: https://psyarxiv.com/s6chb/

34.

Rhodes

Leslie

S. J.

Bianchi

Chalik

(2017). The role of generic language in the early development of social categorization. Child Development, 89, 148–155. doi:10.1111/cdev.12714

35.

Rhodes

Leslie

S.-J.

Tworek

C. M.

(2012). Cultural transmission of social essentialism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 109, 13526–13531. doi:10.1073/pnas.1208951109

36.

Rhodes

Mandalaywala

T. M.

(2017). The development and developmental consequences of social essentialism. WIREs Cognitive Science, 8(4), Article e1437. doi:10.1002/wcs.1437

37.

Schoenfeld

D. A.

(1983). Sample-size formula for the proportional-hazards regression model. Biometrics, 39, 499–503.

38.

Segall

Birnbaum

Deeb

Diesendruck

(2015). The intergenerational transmission of ethnic essentialism: How parents talk counts the most. Developmental Science, 18, 543–555. doi:10.1111/desc.12235

39.

Smiley

P. A.

Dweck

C. S.

(1994). Individual differences in achievement goals among young children. Child Development, 65, 1723–1743. doi:10.2307/1131290

40.

Walton

G. M.

Cohen

G. L.

(2003). Stereotype lift. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 456–467. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00019-2

41.

Waxman

(2010). Names will never hurt me? Naming and the development of racial and gender categories in preschool-aged children. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 593–610. doi:10.1002/ejsp.732

42.

Weinburgh

(1995). Gender differences in student attitudes toward science: A meta-analysis of the literature from 1970 to 1991. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 387–398. doi:10.1002/tea.3660320407

43.

Zhai

Jocz

J. A.

Tan

A.-L

(2014). ‘Am I like a scientist?’: Primary children’s images of doing science in school. International Journal of Science Education, 38, 553–576. doi:10.1080/09500693.2013.791958

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.58 MB