Across the natural world as well as the artificial worlds of maps, diagrams, and data visualizations, feature similarity (e.g., color and shape) links spatially separate areas into sets. Despite a century of study, it is yet unclear what mechanism underlies this gestalt similarity grouping. One recent proposal is that similarity grouping—for example, seeing a red, vertical, or square group—is just global selection of those features. Although parsimonious, this account makes the counterintuitive prediction that similarity grouping is strictly serial: A green group cannot be constructed at the same time as a red group. We tested this prediction with a novel measure—a grouping illusion within number-estimation tasks that should work only if participants simultaneously construct groups—and found the strongest evidence yet in favor of serial feature-based attention (Ns = 14, 12, and 12 for Experiment 1, Experiment 2, and Experiment 3, respectively).
BrainardD. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.
2.
BruceN.TsotsosJ. (2006). Saliency based on information maximization. In SchölkopfB.PlattJ. C.HoffmanT. (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 155–162). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3.
BurrD.RossJ. (2008). A visual sense of number. Current Biology, 18, 425–428.
4.
FranconeriS. L. (2013). The nature and status of visual resources. In ReisbergD. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive psychology (pp. 147–162). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
5.
FranconeriS. L.BemisD. K.AlvarezG. A. (2009). Number estimation relies on a set of segmented objects. Cognition, 113, 1–13.
FrithC. D.FrithU. (1972). The solitaire illusion: An illusion of numerosity. Perception & Psychophysics, 11, 409–410.
8.
HabermanJ.WhitneyD. (2012). Ensemble perception: Summarizing the scene and broadening the limits of visual processing. In WolfeJ.RobertsonL. (Eds.), From perception to consciousness: Searching with Anne Treisman (pp. 339–349). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
9.
HalberdaJ.SiresS. F.FeigensonL. (2006). Multiple spatially overlapping sets can be enumerated in parallel. Psychological Science, 17, 572–576.
10.
HanS.SongY.DingY.YundE. W.WoodsD. L. (2001). Neural substrates for visual perceptual grouping in humans. Psychophysiology, 38, 926–935.
HeL.ZhouK.ZhouT.HeS.ChenL. (2015). Topology-defined units in numerosity perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 112, E5647–E5655.
13.
HuangL. (2015). Grouping by similarity is mediated by feature selection: Evidence from the failure of cue combination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 1364–1369.
14.
HuangL.PashlerH. (2002). Symmetry detection and visual attention: A “binary-map” hypothesis. Vision Research, 42, 1421–1430.
15.
HuangL.PashlerH. (2007). A Boolean map theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 114, 599–631.
16.
HuangL.TreismanA.PashlerH. (2007). Characterizing the limits of human visual awareness. Science, 317, 823–825.
17.
KimchiR.Razpurker-ApfeldI. (2004). Perceptual grouping and attention: Not all groupings are equal. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 687–696.
18.
KirjakovskiA.MatsumotoE. (2016). Numerosity underestimation in sets with illusory contours. Vision Research, 122, 34–42.
19.
KleinerM.BrainardD. H.PelliD. G. (2007). What’s new in Psychtoolbox-3?Perception, 36(ECVP Abstract Suppl.).
20.
LevinthalB. R.FranconeriS. L. (2011). Common-fate grouping as feature selection. Psychological Science, 22, 1132–1137.
21.
LuckS. J.FordM. A. (1998). On the role of selective attention in visual perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 95, 825–830.
22.
MooreC. M.EgethH. (1997). Perception without attention: Evidence of grouping under conditions of inattention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 339–352.
23.
NothelferC.FranconeriS. (2016). Feature redundancy benefits in different attentional modes. Journal of Vision, 16(12), Article 682. doi:10.1167/16.12.682
24.
NothelferC.GleicherM.FranconeriS. (2017). Redundant encoding strengthens segmentation and grouping in visual displays of data. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43, 1667–1676.
25.
OlivaA.TorralbaA. (2006). Building the gist of a scene: The role of global image features in recognition. Progress in Brain Research, 155, 23–36.
26.
PalmerJ. (1995). Attention in visual search: Distinguishing four causes of a set-size effect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 118–123.
27.
PelliD. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442.
28.
PoltoratskiS.XuY. (2013). The association of color memory and the enumeration of multiple spatially overlapping sets. Journal of Vision, 13(8), Article 6. doi:10.1167/13.8.6
29.
RussellC.DriverJ. (2005). New indirect measures of “inattentive” visual grouping in a change-detection task. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 606–623.
30.
ShomsteinS.LeeJ.BehrmannM. (2010). Top-down and bottom-up attentional guidance: Investigating the role of the dorsal and ventral parietal cortices. Experimental Brain Research, 206, 197–208.
31.
SzafirD. A.HarozS.GleicherM.FranconeriS. (2016). Four types of ensemble coding in data visualizations. Journal of Vision, 16(5), Article 11. doi:10.1167/16.5.11
32.
TownsendJ. T. (1972). Some results concerning the identifiability of parallel and serial processes. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 25, 168–199.
33.
TreismanA. M.GeladeG. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.
34.
TrickL. M.EnnsJ. T. (1997). Clusters precede shapes in perceptual organization. Psychological Science, 8, 124–129.
35.
von EhrenfelsC. (1988). On ‘gestalt qualities.’ In SmithB. (Ed. & Trans.), Foundations of gestalt theory (pp. 82–117). Munich, Germany: Philosophia. (Original work published 1890)
36.
WagemansJ.ElderJ. H.KubovyM.PalmerS. E.PetersonM. A.SinghM.von der HeydtR. (2012). A century of gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure–ground organization. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 1172–1217.
37.
WolfeJ. M.HorowitzT. S. (2004). What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it?Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 495–501.
38.
WoodmanG. F.LuckS. J. (2003). Serial deployment of attention during visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 121–138.
39.
YuD.TamD.FranconeriS. L. (2019). Gestalt similarity groupings are not constructed in parallel. Cognition, 182, 8–13.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
