Language acquisition presents a formidable task for infants, for whom word learning is a crucial yet challenging step. Syntax (the rules for combining words into sentences) has been robustly shown to be a cue to word meaning. But how can infants access syntactic information when they are still acquiring the meanings of words? We investigated the contribution of two cues that may help infants break into the syntax and give a boost to their lexical acquisition: phrasal prosody (speech melody) and function words, both of which are accessible early in life and correlate with syntactic structure in the world’s languages. We show that 18-month-old infants use prosody and function words to recover sentences’ syntactic structure, which in turn constrains the possible meanings of novel words: Participants (N = 48 in each of two experiments) interpreted a novel word as referring to either an object or an action, given its position within the prosodic-syntactic structure of sentences.
BergelsonE.SwingleyD. (2012). At 6–9 months, human infants know the meanings of many common nouns. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 109, 3253–3258. doi:10.1073/pnas.1113380109
2.
BernalS.LidzJ.MillotteS.ChristopheA. (2007). Syntax constrains the acquisition of verb meaning. Language Learning and Development, 3, 325–341. doi:10.1080/15475440701542609
3.
BrusiniP.AmsiliP.ChemlaE.ChristopheA. (2011). Learning to categorize nouns and verbs on the basis of a few known examples: A computational model relying on 2-word contexts. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
4.
CareyS. (2009). The origin of concepts. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
5.
CauvetE.LimissuriR.MillotteS.SkoruppaK.CabrolD.ChristopheA. (2014). Function words constrain on-line recognition of verbs and nouns in French 18-month-olds. Language Learning and Development, 10, 1–18. doi:10.1080/15475441.2012.757970
6.
ChristodoulopoulosC.RothD.FisherC. (2016). An incremental model of syntactic bootstrapping. In Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Cognitive Aspects of Computational Language Learning (pp. 38–43). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
7.
ChristopheA.DautricheI.de CarvalhoA.BrusiniP. (2016). Bootstrapping the syntactic bootstrapper. In ScottJ.WaughtalD. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 40th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 75–88). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
8.
ChristopheA.MillotteS.BernalS.LidzJ. (2008). Bootstrapping lexical and syntactic acquisition. Language and Speech, 51, 61–75. doi:10.1177/00238309080510010501
9.
CohenL.AtkinsonD.ChaputH. (2004). Habit X: A New Program for Obtaining and Organizing Data in Infant Perception and Cognition Studies (Version 1.0) [Computer software]. Austin: University of Texas.
10.
de CarvalhoA.DautricheI.ChristopheA. (2016). Preschoolers use phrasal prosody online to constrain syntactic analysis. Developmental Science, 19, 235–250. doi:10.1111/desc.12300
11.
de CarvalhoA.LidzJ.TieuL.BleamT.ChristopheA. (2016). English-speaking preschoolers can use phrasal prosody for syntactic parsing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 139, EL216-EL222. doi:10.1121/1.4954385
12.
DryerM. (1992). The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language, 68, 81–138.
13.
FisherC.TokuraH. (1996). Prosody in speech to infants: Direct and indirect acoustic cues to syntactic structure. In MorganJ. L.DemuthK. (Eds.), Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition (pp. 343–363). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
14.
GervainJ.NesporM.MazukaR.HorieR.MehlerJ. (2008). Bootstrapping word order in prelexical infants: A Japanese–Italian cross-linguistic study. Cognitive Psychology, 57, 56–74. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2007.12.001
15.
GleitmanL. (1990). The structural sources of verb meanings. Language Acquisition, 1, 3–55.
16.
GutmanA.DautricheI.CrabbéB.ChristopheA. (2015). Bootstrapping the syntactic bootstrapper: Probabilistic labeling of prosodic phrases. Language Acquisition, 22, 285–309. doi:10.1080/10489223.2014.971956
17.
HeA. X.LidzJ. (2017). Verb learning in 14- and 18-month-old English-learning infants. Language Learning and Development, 13, 335–356. doi:10.1080/15475441.2017.1285238
18.
JunS.FougeronC. (2002). Realizations of accentual phrase in French intonation. Probus, 14, 147–172. doi:10.1515/prbs.2002.002
19.
KernS.GayraudG. (2010). Inventaire Français du Développement Communicatif (IFDC). [French Communicative Development Inventory]. Grenoble, France: La Cigale.
20.
MännelC.FriedericiA. D. (2009). Pauses and intonational phrasing: ERP studies in 5-month-old German infants and adults. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 1988–2006. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21221
21.
MehlerJ.JusczykP.LambertzG.HalstedN.BertonciniJ.Amiel-TisonC. (1988). A precursor of language acquisition in young infants. Cognition, 29, 143–178. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(88)90035-2
22.
MillotteS.WalesR.ChristopheA. (2007). Phrasal prosody disambiguates syntax. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 898–909. doi:10.1080/01690960701205286
23.
MintzT. H. (2003). Frequent frames as a cue for grammatical categories in child directed speech. Cognition, 90, 91–117. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00140-9
24.
MorganJ.DemuthK. (1996). Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
25.
NesporM.VogelI. (1986). Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.
26.
OakesL. M. (2017). Sample size, statistical power, and false conclusions in infant looking-time research. Infancy, 22, 436–469. doi:10.1111/infa.12186
27.
PinkerS. (1984). Language learnability and language development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28.
R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
29.
Shattuck-HufnagelS.TurkA. E. (1996). A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 193–247. doi:10.1007/BF01708572
ShiR.MorganJ. L.AllopennaP. D. (1998). Phonological and acoustic bases for earliest grammatical category assignment: A cross-linguistic perspective. Journal of Child Language, 25, 169–201. doi:10.1017/S0305000997003395
32.
ShiR.WerkerJ. F.MorganJ. L. (1999). Newborn infants’ sensitivity to perceptual cues to lexical and grammatical words. Cognition, 72(2), B11–B21. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00047-5
33.
ShuklaM.WhiteK. S.AslinR. N. (2011). Prosody guides the rapid mapping of auditory word forms onto visual objects in 6-mo-old infants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 108, 6038–6043. doi:10.1073/pnas.1017617108
34.
SnedekerJ.YuanS. (2008). Effects of prosodic and lexical constraints on parsing in young children (and adults). Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 574–608. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.08.001
35.
SoderstromM.BlossomM.FoygelR.MorganJ. (2008). Acoustical cues and grammatical units in speech to two preverbal infants. Journal of Child Language, 35, 869–902. doi:10.1017/S0305000908008763
36.
SoderstromM.SeidlA.Kemler NelsonD. G.JusczykP. W. (2003). The prosodic bootstrapping of phrases: Evidence from prelinguistic infants. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 249–267. doi:10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00024-X
37.
WaxmanS. R.LidzJ. L.BraunI. E.LavinT. (2009). Twenty four-month-old infants’ interpretations of novel verbs and nouns in dynamic scenes. Cognitive Psychology, 59, 67–95. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.02.001
38.
WelbyP. (2006). French intonational structure: Evidence from tonal alignment. Journal of Phonetics, 34, 343–371. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2005.09.001
39.
WerkerJ. F.CohenL. B.LloydV. L.CasasolaM.StagerC. L. (1998). Acquisition of word–object associations by 14-month-old infants. Developmental Psychology, 34, 1289–1309. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.34.6.1289
40.
YarowskyD. (1995). Unsupervised word sense disambiguation rivaling supervised methods. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual meeting of the Association for Computational Ling-uistics (pp. 189–196). Morristown, NJ: Association for Com-putational Linguistics. doi:10.3115/981658.981684
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
