Humans are remarkably accurate at recognizing familiar faces, whereas their ability to recognize, or even match, unfamiliar faces is much poorer. However, previous research has failed to identify neural correlates of this striking behavioral difference. Here, we found a clear difference in brain potentials elicited by highly familiar faces versus unfamiliar faces. This effect starts 200 ms after stimulus onset and reaches its maximum at 400 to 600 ms. This sustained-familiarity effect was substantially larger than previous candidates for a neural familiarity marker and was detected in almost all participants, representing a reliable index of high familiarity. Whereas its scalp distribution was consistent with a generator in the ventral visual pathway, its modulation by repetition and degree of familiarity suggests an integration of affective and visual information.
AndrewsS.BurtonA. M.SchweinbergerS. R.WieseH. (2017). Event-related potentials reveal the development of stable face representations from natural variability. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 1620–1632. doi:10.1080/17470218.2016.1195851
2.
BarM.AminoffE.IshaiA. (2008). Famous faces activate contextual associations in the parahippocampal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 18, 1233–1238.
3.
BauerR. M. (1984). Autonomic recognition of names and faces in prosopagnosia: A neuropsychological application of the guilty knowledge test. Neuropsychologia, 22, 457–469. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(84)90040-X
4.
BentinS.AllisonT.PuceA.PerezE.McCarthyG. (1996). Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 551–565. doi:10.1162/jocn.1996.8.6.551
5.
BobesM. A.Lage CastellanosA.QuiñonesI.GarcíaL.Valdes-SosaM. (2013). Timing and tuning for familiarity of cortical responses to faces. PLOS ONE, 8(10), Article e76100. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076100
6.
BruceV.YoungA. (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 305–327.
7.
BruceV.YoungA. (2012). Face perception. Hove, England: Psychology Press.
8.
BurtonA. M.JenkinsR.HancockP. J. B.WhiteD. (2005). Robust representations for face recognition: The power of averages. Cognitive Psychology, 51, 256–284. doi:10.1016/J.Cogpsych.2005.06.003
9.
BurtonA. M.JenkinsR.SchweinbergerS. R. (2011). Mental representations of familiar faces. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 943–958. doi:10.1111/J.2044-8295.2011.02039.X
10.
BurtonA. M.KramerR. S. S.RitchieK. L.JenkinsR. (2016). Identity from variation: Representations of faces derived from multiple instances. Cognitive Science, 40, 202–223. doi:10.1111/cogs.12231
11.
BurtonA. M.WilsonS.CowanM.BruceV. (1999). Face recognition in poor-quality video: Evidence from security surveillance. Psychological Science, 10, 243–248. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00144
12.
ButlerD. L.MattingleyJ. B.CunningtonR.SuddendorfT. (2013). Different neural processes accompany self-recognition in photographs across the lifespan: An ERP study using dizygotic twins. PLOS ONE, 8(9), Article e72586. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0072586
13.
CaharelS.CourtayN.BernardC.LalondeR.RebaiM. (2005). Familiarity and emotional expression influence an early stage of face processing: An electrophysiological study. Brain and Cognition, 59, 96–100. doi:10.1016/J.Bandc.2005.05.005
14.
Davies-ThompsonJ.GouwsA.AndrewsT. J. (2009). An image-dependent representation of familiar and unfamiliar faces in the human ventral stream. Neuropsychologia, 47, 1627–1635. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.01.017
15.
Di NoceraF.FerlazzoF. (2000). Resampling approach to statistical inference: Bootstrapping from event-related potentials data. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32, 111–119.
16.
EllisH. D.LewisM. B. (2001). Capgras delusion: A window on face recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 149–156. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01620-X
17.
EllisH. D.YoungA. W.QuayleA. H.DePauwK. W. (1997). Reduced autonomic responses to faces in Capgras delusion. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 264, 1085–1092.
18.
EwbankM. P.AndrewsT. J. (2008). Differential sensitivity for viewpoint between familiar and unfamiliar faces in human visual cortex. NeuroImage, 40, 1857–1870. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.01.049
19.
EwbankM. P.HensonR. N.RoweJ. B.StoyanovaR. S.CalderA. J. (2013). Different neural mechanisms within occipitotemporal cortex underlie repetition suppression across same and different-size faces. Cerebral Cortex, 23, 1073–1084. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhs070
20.
FarwellL. A.DonchinE. (1991). The truth will out: Interrogative polygraphy (“lie detection”) with event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology, 28, 531–547. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1991.tb01990.x
21.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.LangA.-G.BuchnerA. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
22.
GobbiniM. I.HaxbyJ. V. (2007). Neural systems for recognition of familiar faces. Neuropsychologia, 45, 32–41. doi:10.1016/J.Neuropsychologia.2006.04.015
23.
GobbiniM. I.LeibenluftE.SantiagoN.HaxbyJ. V. (2004). Social and emotional attachment in the neural representation of faces. NeuroImage, 22, 1628–1635. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.03.049
24.
GoslingA.EimerM. (2011). An event-related brain potential study of explicit face recognition. Neuropsychologia, 49, 2736–2745. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.05.025
25.
HerzmannG.SchweinbergerS. R.SommerW.JentzschI. (2004). What’s special about personally familiar faces? A multimodal approach. Psychophysiology, 41, 688–701.
26.
HirsteinW.RamachandranV. S. (1997). Capgras syndrome: A novel probe for understanding the neural representation of the identity and familiarity of persons. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 264, 437–444. doi:10.1098/rspb.1997.0062
27.
JenkinsR.BurtonA. M. (2011). Stable face representations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366, 1671–1683. doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0379
28.
JenkinsR.WhiteD.Van MontfortX.BurtonM. A. (2011). Variability in photos of the same face. Cognition, 121, 313–323. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.08.001
29.
JohnstonP.OverellA.KaufmanJ.RobinsonJ.YoungA. W. (2016). Expectations about person identity modulate the face-sensitive N170. Cortex, 85, 54–64. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2016.10.002
30.
KanwisherN.McDermottJ.ChunM. M. (1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. The Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 4302–4311.
31.
KeyesH.BradyN.ReillyR. B.FoxeJ. J. (2010). My face or yours? Event-related potential correlates of self-face processing. Brain and Cognition, 72, 244–254. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2009.09.006
32.
KramerR. S. S.YoungA. W.BurtonA. M. (2018). Understanding face familiarity. Cognition, 172, 46–58. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.12.005
33.
QuirogaR. Q.ReddyL.KreimanG.KochC.FriedI. (2005). Invariant visual representation by single neurons in the human brain. Nature, 435, 1102–1107. doi:10.1038/Nature03687
34.
RamonM.GobbiniM. I. (2018). Familiarity matters: A review on prioritized processing of personally familiar faces. Visual Cognition, 26, 179–195. doi:10.1080/13506285.2017.1405134
35.
RosenfeldJ. P.SoskinsM.BoshG.RyanA. (2004). Simple, effective countermeasures to P300-based tests of detection of concealed information. Psychophysiology, 41, 205–219. doi:10.1111/1.1469-8986.2004.00158.x
36.
SchweinbergerS. R.BurtonA. M. (2003). Covert recognition and the neural system for face processing. Cortex, 39, 9–30. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70071-6
37.
SchweinbergerS. R.NeumannM. F. (2016). Repetition effects in human ERPs to faces. Cortex, 80, 141–153. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2015.11.001
38.
SchweinbergerS. R.PickeringE. C.JentzschI.BurtonA. M.KaufmannJ. M. (2002). Event-related brain potential evidence for a response of inferior temporal cortex to familiar face repetitions. Cognitive Brain Research, 14, 398–409.
39.
TranelD.DamasioH.DamasioA. R. (1995). Double dissociation between overt and covert face recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 425–432.
40.
WeibertK.HarrisR. J.MitchellA.ByrneH.YoungA. W.AndrewsT. J. (2016). An image-invariant neural response to familiar faces in the human medial temporal lobe. Cortex, 84, 34–42.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
