A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of Spatial Interference From Linguistic Cues: Beyond Petrova et al. (2018)

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Amer

Gozli

D. G.

Pratt

(2017). Biasing spatial attention with semantic information: An event coding approach. Psychological Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s00426-017-0867-5

Balota

D. A.

Cortese

M. J.

Sergent-Marshall

S. D.

Spieler

D. H.

Yap

M. J.

(2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 283–316.

Barsalou

L. W

. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems [Target article and commentaries]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660.

Barsalou

L. W.

(2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645.

Barsalou

L. W.

(2016). On staying grounded and avoiding quixotic dead ends. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 1122–1142.

Bates

Burani

D’Amico

Barca

(2001). Word reading and picture naming in Italian. Memory & Cognition, 29, 986–999.

*Bergen

B. K.

Lindsay

Matlock

Narayanan

(2007). Spatial and linguistic aspects of visual imagery in sentence comprehension. Cognitive Science, 31, 733–764.

Braver

S. L.

Thoemmes

F. J.

Rosenthal

(2014). Continuously cumulating meta-analysis and replicability. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 333–342.

Buchanan

Besner

(1993). Reading aloud: Evidence for the use of a whole word nonsemantic pathway. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 133–152.

10.

Burani

Arduino

L. S.

Barca

(2007). Frequency, not age of acquisition, affects Italian word naming. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 19, 828–866.

11.

Connell

Lynott

(2014). Principles of representation: Why you can’t represent the same concept twice. Topics in Cognitive Science, 6, 390–406.

12.

*Estes

(2016). [Test of spatial interference in Italian]. Unpublished data.

13.

*Estes

Verges

Adelman

J. S.

(2015). Words, objects, and locations: Perceptual matching explains spatial interference and facilitation. Journal of Memory and Language, 84, 167–189.

14.

*Estes

Verges

Barsalou

L. W.

(2008). Head up, foot down: Object words orient attention to the objects’ typical location. Psychological Science, 19, 93–97.

15.

*Gozli

D. G.

Chasteen

A. L.

Pratt

(2013). The cost and benefit of implicit spatial cues for visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 1028–1046.

16.

Hutchison

K. A.

Balota

D. A.

Neely

J. H.

Cortese

M. J.

Cohen-Shikora

E. R.

Tse

C.-S.

. . . Buchanan

(2013). The semantic priming project. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 1099–1114.

17.

Katz

Frost

(1992). The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In Frost

Katz

(Eds.), Advances in psychology: Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (Vol. 94, pp. 67–84). San Diego, CA: North-Holland.

18.

Lebois

L. A. M.

Wilson-Mendenhall

C. D.

Barsalou

L. W.

(2015). Are automatic conceptual cores the gold standard of semantic processing? The context-dependence of spatial meaning in grounded congruency effects. Cognitive Science, 39, 1764–1801.

19.

Lipsey

M. W.

Wilson

D. B.

(2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

20.

Moseley

R. L.

Pulvermüller

Shtyrov

(2013). Sensorimotor semantics on the spot: Brain activity dissociates between conceptual categories within 150 ms. Scientific Reports, 3, Article 1928. doi:10.1038/srep01928

21.

Neely

J. H.

(1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 226–254.

22.

Ostarek

Vigliocco

(2017). Reading sky and seeing a cloud: On the relevance of events for perceptual simulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43, 579–590.

23.

Pagliuca

Monaghan

(2010). Discovering large grain sizes in a transparent orthography: Insights from a connectionist model of Italian word naming. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22, 813–835.

24.

Peressotti

Job

(2003). Reading aloud: Dissociating the semantic pathway from the non-semantic pathway of the lexical route. Reading and Writing, 16, 179–194.

25.

*Petrova

Navarette

Suitner

Sulpizio

Reynolds

Job

Peressotti

(2018). Spatial congruency effects exist, just not for words: Looking into Estes, Verges, and Barsalou (2008). Psychological Science, 29, 1195–1199.

26.

*Petrova

Sulpizio

Navarrete

Job

Suitner

Peressotti

(2013, August/September). Foot or X down? Response compatibility but no effects of the object’s typical location. Several failures to replicate Estes, Verges & Barsalou (2008). Poster presented at the 18th Conference of the European Society for Cognitive Psychology (ESCOP), Budapest, Hungary.

27.

Posner

M. I.

Snyder

C. R. R.

(1975). Attention and cognitive control. In Solso

R. L.

(Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 55–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

28.

*Renkewitz

Muller

S. M.

(2016, August 19). Replication of Estes, Verges, & Barsalou (2008, PS, Study 1). Retrieved from osf.io/vwnit.

29.

Richardson

D. C.

Spivey

M. J.

Barsalou

L. W.

McRae

(2003). Spatial representations activated during real-time comprehension of verbs. Cognitive Science, 27, 767–780.

30.

Schmalz

Marinus

Coltheart

Castles

(2015). Getting to the bottom of orthographic depth. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 1614–1629.

31.

Tabossi

Laghi

(1992). Semantic priming in the pronunciation of words in two writing systems: Italian and English. Memory & Cognition, 20, 303–313.

32.

*Verges

Duffy

(2009). Spatial representations elicit dual-coding effects in mental imagery. Cognitive Science, 33, 1157–1172.

33.

Wilson

D. B.

(2006). Meta-analysis macros for SAS, SPSS, and Stata. Retrieved from http://mason.gmu.edu/~dwilsonb/ma.html

34.

Wilson-Mendenhall

C. D.

Simmons

W. K.

Martin

Barsalou

L. W.

(2013). Contextual processing of abstract concepts reveals neural representations of nonlinguistic semantic content. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 920–935.

35.

Yee

Thompson-Schill

S. L.

(2016). Putting concepts into context. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 1015–1027.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.58 MB

0.50 MB