Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Moral outrage has traditionally served a valuable social function, expressing group values and inhibiting deviant behavior, but the exponential dynamics of Internet postings make this expression of legitimate individual outrage appear excessive and unjust. The same individual outrage that would be praised in isolation is more likely to be viewed as bullying when echoed online by a multitude of similar responses, as it then seems to contribute to disproportionate group condemnation. Participants (N = 3,377) saw racist, sexist, or unpatriotic posts with accompanying expressions of outrage and formed impressions of a single commenter. The same commenter was viewed more negatively when accompanied by a greater number of commenters (i.e., when outrage was viral vs. nonviral), and this was because viral outrage elicited greater sympathy toward the initial offender. We examined this effect and its underlying processes across six studies.

Keywords

morality outrage social judgment social justice punishment open data open materials preregistered

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alicke

M. D.

(1992). Culpable causation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 368–378.

Asch

S. E.

(1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 70(9), 1–70.

Barclay

(2006). Reputational benefits for altruistic punishment. Evolution & Human Behavior, 27, 325–344.

Batson

C. D.

Shaw

L. L.

(1991). Evidence for altruism: Toward a pluralism of prosocial motives. Psychological Inquiry, 2, 107–122.

Blistein

(2015, March 31). ‘Daily Show’ hire Trevor Noah under fire for tweets offending Jews, women. Rolling Stone. Retrieved from http://www.rollingstone.com/tv/news/trevor-noah-under-fire-for-tweets-offending-jews-women-20150331

Brady

W. J.

Wills

J. A.

Jost

J. T.

Tucker

J. A.

Van Bavel

J. J.

(2017). Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 114, 7313–7318.

Bruk

(2016, August 18). Blake Shelton apologizes for offensive tweets, sort of. Cosmopolitan. Retrieved from http://www.cosmopolitan.com/entertainment/news/a62943/blake-shelton-racist-tweets-apology/

Cialdini

R. B.

(1993). Influence: Science and practice (3rd ed.). New York, NY: HarperCollins.

Cialdini

R. B.

Reno

R. R.

Kallgren

C. A.

(1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015–1026.

10.

Clemons

(2016, September 30). ‘Blackface’ social media post goes viral, lands Prairie View A&M athlete in hot water. ABC News. Retrieved from http://abc13.com/news/prairie-view-athlete-in-hot-water-after-blackface-post/1534688/

11.

Crockett

M. J.

(2017). Moral outrage in the digital age. Nature Human Behavior, 1, 769–771.

12.

Czopp

A. M.

Monteith

M. J.

Mark

A. Y.

(2006). Standing up for a change: Reducing bias through interpersonal confrontation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 784–803.

13.

Erikson

K. T.

(1966). Wayward puritans: A study in the sociology of deviance. London, England: John Wiley & Sons.

14.

Fehr

Gächter

(2002). Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature, 415, 137–140.

15.

Fragale

A. R.

Rosen

Merideth

(2009). The higher they are, the harder they fall: The effects of wrongdoer status on observer punishment recommendations and intentionality attributions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108, 53–65.

16.

Gray

Young

Waytz

(2012). Mind perception is the essence of morality. Psychological Inquiry, 23, 101–124.

17.

Haidt

(2003). The moral emotions. In Davidson

R. J.

Scherer

K. R.

Goldsmith

H. H.

(Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 852–870). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

18.

Hartocollis

(2015, December 7). Yale lecturer resigns after email on Halloween costumes. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/08/us/yale-lecturer-resigns-after-email-on-halloween-costumes.html

19.

Hechler

Kessler

(2018). On the difference between moral outrage and empathic anger: Anger about wrongful deeds or harmful consequences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 76, 270–282.

20.

Hempel

(2017, October 18). The problem with #metoo and viral outrage. Wired. Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/story/the-problem-with-me-too-and-viral-outrage/

21.

Inesi

M. E.

Gruenfeld

D. H.

Galinsky

A. D.

(2012). How power corrupts relationships: Cynical attributions for others’ generous acts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 795–803.

22.

Monin

Sawyer

P. J.

Marquez

M. J.

(2008). The rejection of moral rebels: Resenting those who do the right thing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 76–93.

23.

Morewedge

C. K.

(2009). Negativity bias in attribution of external agency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 535–545.

24.

Prentice

D. A.

Miller

D. T.

(1992). When small effects are impressive. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 160–164.

25.

Quinn

(2015, June 11). Nobel laureate Tim Hunt resigns after ‘trouble with girls’ comment. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/education/2015/jun/11/nobel-laureate-sir-tim-hunt-resigns-trouble-with-girls-comments

26.

Raihani

N. J.

Bshary

(2015). The reputation of punishers. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 30, 98–103.

27.

Rattan

Dweck

C. S.

(2010). Who confronts prejudice? The role of implicit theories in the motivation to confront prejudice. Psychological Science, 21, 952–959.

28.

Ronson

(2015). So you’ve been publicly shamed. New York, NY: Penguin.

29.

Rozin

Lowery

Imada

Haidt

(1999). The CAD triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 574–586.

30.

Salerno

J. M.

Peter-Hagene

L. C.

(2013). The interactive effect of anger and disgust on moral outrage and judgments. Psychological Science, 24, 2069–2078.

31.

Simmons

J. P.

Nelson

L. D.

Simonsohn

(2013, January). Life after p-hacking. Paper presented at the Meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, New Orleans, LA.

32.

Spencer

S. J.

Zanna

M. P.

Fong

G. T.

(2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 845–851.

33.

Tannenbaum

Uhlmann

E. L.

Diermeier

(2011). Moral signals, public outrage, and immaterial harms. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1249–1254.

34.

Tosi

Warmke

(2016). Moral grandstanding. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 44, 193–217.

35.

Walker

L. J.

Hennig

K. H.

(2004). Differing conceptions of moral exemplarity: Just, brave, and caring. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 629–647.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.60 MB

0.50 MB

The Paradox of Viral Outrage

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material