Collective narcissism—a phenomenon in which individuals show excessively high regard for their own group—is ubiquitous in studies of small groups. We examined how Americans from the 50 U.S. states (N = 2,898) remembered U.S. history by asking them, “In terms of percentage, what do you think was your home state’s contribution to the history of the United States?” The mean state estimates ranged from 9% (Iowa) to 41% (Virginia), with the total contribution for all states equaling 907%, indicating strong collective narcissism. In comparison, ratings provided by nonresidents for states were much lower (but still high). Surprisingly, asking people questions about U.S. history before they made their judgment did not lower estimates. We argue that this ethnocentric bias is due to ego protection, selective memory retrieval processes involving the availability heuristic, and poor statistical reasoning. This study shows that biases that influence individual remembering also influence collective remembering.
BaumeisterR. F.HastingsS. (1997). Distortions of collective memory: How groups flatter and deceive themselves. In PennebakerJ. W.PaezD.RiméB. (Eds.), Collective memory of political events (pp. 277–293). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3.
BrewerM. B. (1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love and outgroup hate?Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429–444. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00126
4.
BuhrmesterM.KwangT.GoslingS. D. (2011). Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3–5. doi:10.1177/1745691610393980
5.
CialdiniR. B.BordenR. J.ThorneA.WalkerM. R.FreemanS.SloanL. R. (1976). Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 366–375. doi:10.2307/2786860
6.
de ZavalaA. G.CichockaA.EidelsonR.JayawickremeN. (2009). Collective narcissism and its social consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1074–1096. doi:10.1037/a0016904
7.
GilovichT.MedvecV. H.SavitskyK. (2000). The spotlight effect in social judgment: An egocentric bias in estimates of the salience of one’s own actions and appearance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 211–222. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.78.2.211
8.
HalbwachsM. (1992). On collective memory (CoserL. A. Ed. and Trans.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
9.
HirstW.ManierD. (2008). Towards a psychology of collective memory. Memory, 16, 183–200. doi:10.1080/09658210701811912
10.
HollandsJ. G.DyreB. P. (2000). Bias in proportion judgments: The cyclical power model. Psychological Review, 107, 500–524. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.107.3.500
11.
HoorensV. (1993). Self-enhancement and superiority biases in social comparison. European Review of Social Psychology, 4, 113–139. doi:10.1080/14792779343000040
12.
KahnemanD.TverskyA. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430–454. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(72)90016-3
13.
KelleyC. M.JacobyL. L. (1996). Adult egocentrism: Subjective experience versus analytic bases for judgment. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 157–175.
14.
LandyD.GuayB.MarghetisT. (in press). Bias and ignorance in demographic perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
15.
LewisM. (2016). The undoing project: A friendship that changed our minds. New York, NY: Norton.
16.
ProninE. (2007). Perception and misperception of bias in human judgment. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 37–43. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.001
17.
RajaramS.Pereira-PasarinL. P. (2010). Collaborative memory: Cognitive research and theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 649–663. doi:10.1177/1745691610388763
18.
RoedigerDeSotoK. A. (2014). Forgetting the presidents. Science, 346, 1106–1109. doi:10.1126/science.1258396
19.
RoedigerDeSotoK. A. (2016). Recognizing the presidents: Was Alexander Hamilton president?Psychological Science, 27, 644–650. doi:10.1177/0956797616631113
20.
RossL.GreeneD.HouseP. (1977). The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 279–301. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(77)90049-X
21.
RossM.SicolyF. (1979). Egocentric biases in availability and attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 322–336. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.3.322
22.
SavitskyK.Van BovenL.EpleyN.WightD. M. (2005). The unpacking effect in allocations of responsibility for group tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 447–457.
23.
SchermanA. Z.SalgadoS.ShaoZ.BerntsenD. (2017). Life script events and autobiographical memories of important life story events in Mexico, Greenland, China, and Denmark. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6, 60–73. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2016.11.007
24.
SchroederJ.CarusoE. M.EpleyN. (2016). Many hands make overlooked work: Over-claiming of responsibility increases with group size. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 22, 238–246. doi:10.1037/xap0000080.supp
25.
StanovichK. E.WestR. F.ToplakM. E. (2013). Myside bias, rational thinking, and intelligence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 259–264. doi:10.1177/0963721413480174
26.
StoneC. B.ComanA.BrownA. D.KoppelJ.HirstW. (2012). Toward a science of silence: The consequences of leaving a memory unsaid. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 39–53. doi:10.1177/1745691611427303
27.
StoneC. B.HirstW. (2014). (Induced) forgetting to form a collective memory. Memory Studies, 7, 314–327. doi:10.1177/1750698014530621
28.
TaylorR. J.Burton-WoodC. G.GarryM. (2017). America was great when nationally relevant events occurred and when Americans were young. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6, 425–433. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.05.003
29.
TaylorS. E.BrownJ. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193–210. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193
30.
ThomasR.DoughertyM. R.ButtaccioD. R. (2014). Memory constraints on hypothesis generation and decision making. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 264–270. doi:10.1177/0963721414534853
31.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–232. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9
32.
TverskyA.KoehlerD. J. (1994). Support theory: A nonextensional representation of subjective probability. Psychological Review, 101, 547–567.
33.
WertschJ. V. (2002). Voices of collective remembering. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
ZarombF.ButlerA. C.AgarwalP. K.RoedigerH. L.III. (2014). Collective memories of three wars in United States history in younger and older adults. Memory & Cognition, 42, 383–399. doi:10.3758/s13421-013-0369-7
36.
ZarombF. M.LiuJ.PáezD.HankeK.PutnamA. L.RoedigerH. L.III (2018). We made history: Citizens of 35 countries overestimate their nation’s role in world history. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. Advance online publication. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.05.006
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
