Interceptive timing is a fundamental ability underpinning numerous actions (e.g., ball catching), but its development and relationship with other cognitive functions remain poorly understood. Piaget suggested that children need to learn the physical rules that govern their environment before they can represent abstract concepts such as number and time. Thus, learning how objects move in space and time may underpin the development of related abstract representations (i.e., mathematics). To test this hypothesis, we captured objective measures of interceptive timing in 309 primary school children (5–11 years old), alongside scores for general motor skill and national standardized academic attainment. Bayesian estimation showed that interceptive timing (but not general motor capability) uniquely predicted mathematical ability even after we controlled for age, reading, and writing attainment. This finding demonstrates that interceptive timing is distinct from other motor skills with specificity in predicting childhood mathematical ability independently of other forms of attainment and motor capability.
BartonR. A. (2012). Embodied cognitive evolution and the cerebellum. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367, 2097–2107. doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0112
2.
BuetiD.WalshV. (2009). The parietal cortex and the representation of time, space, number and other magnitudes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364, 1831–1840. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0028
3.
BurrD. C.RossJ.BindaP.MorroneM. C. (2011). Saccades compress space, time, and number. In DehaeneS.BrannonE. (Eds.), Space, time and number in the brain (pp. 175–186). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-385948-8.00012-8
4.
CameronC. E.BrockL. L.MurrahW. M.BellL. H.WorzallaS. L.GrissmerD.MorrisonF. J. (2012). Fine motor skills and executive function both contribute to kindergarten achievement. Child Development, 83, 1229–1244. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01768.x
5.
CarlsonA. G.RoweE.CurbyT. W. (2013). Disentangling fine motor skills’ relations to academic achievement: The relative contributions of visual-spatial integration and visual-motor coordination. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 174, 514–533. doi:10.1080/00221325.2012.717122
6.
ChangA. Y.-C.TzengO. J. L.HungD. L.WuD. H. (2011). Big time is not always long: Numerical magnitude automatically affects time reproduction. Psychological Science, 22, 1567–1573. doi:10.1177/0956797611418837
7.
de HeviaM. D.SpelkeE. S. (2010). Number-space mapping in human infants. Psychological Science, 21, 653–660. doi:10.1177/0956797610366091
8.
DesmurgetM.GraftonS. (2000). Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 423–431. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01537-0
9.
FiasW.van DijckJ. P.GeversW. (2011). How is number associated with space? The role of working memory. In DehaeneS.BrannonE. (Eds.), Space, time and number in the brain (pp. 133–148). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-385948-8.00010-4
10.
FlanaganJ. R.WingA. M. (1997). The role of internal models in motion planning and control: Evidence from grip force adjustments during movements of hand-held loads. The Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 1519–1528. doi:10.1007/s00221-008-1691-3
11.
FlattersI.CulmerP.HoltR. J.WilkieR. M.Mon-WilliamsM. (2014). A new tool for assessing head movements and postural sway in children. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 950–959. doi:10.3758/s13428-013-0419-x
12.
FlattersI.HillL. J. B.WilliamsJ. H. G.BarberS. E.Mon-WilliamsM. (2014). Manual control age and sex differences in 4 to 11 year old children. PLOS ONE, 9(2), Article e88692. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0088692
13.
FlattersI.MushtaqF.HillL. J. B.HoltR. J.WilkieR. M.Mon-WilliamsM. (2014). The relationship between a child’s postural stability and manual dexterity. Experimental Brain Research, 232, 2907–2917. doi:10.1007/s00221-014-3947-4
14.
FranklinD. W.WolpertD. M. (2011). Computational mechanisms of sensorimotor control. Neuron, 72, 425–442. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.10.006
15.
GelmanA. (2014). Bayesian data analysis (3rd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.
16.
GrissmerD.GrimmK. J.AiyerS. M.MurrahW. M.SteeleJ. S. (2010). Fine motor skills and early comprehension of the world: Two new school readiness indicators. Developmental Psychology, 46, 1008–1017. doi:10.1037/a0020104
17.
HillL. J. B.WilliamsJ. H. G.AucottL.ThomsonJ.Mon-WilliamsM. (2011). How does exercise benefit performance on cognitive tests in primary-school pupils?Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 53, 630–635. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.03954.x
18.
HoffmanM. D.GelmanA. (2011). The No-U-Turn sampler: Adaptively setting path lengths in Hamiltonian Monte Carlo. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 15, 1351–1381.
19.
HubbardE. M.PiazzaM.PinelP.DehaeneS. (2005). Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 435–448. doi:10.1038/nrn1684
20.
LauerJ. E.LourencoS. F. (2016). Spatial processing in infancy predicts both spatial and mathematical aptitude in childhood. Psychological Science, 27, 1291–1298. doi:10.1177/0956797616655977
21.
LourencoS. F.LongoM. R. (2010). General magnitude representation in human infants. Psychological Science, 21, 873–881. doi:10.1177/0956797610370158
22.
LuoZ.JoseP. E.HuntsingerC. S.PigottT. D. (2007). Fine motor skills and mathematics achievement in East Asian American and European American kindergartners and first graders. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 25, 595–614. doi:10.1348/026151007X185329
23.
MerfeldD. M.ZupanL.PeterkaR. J. (1999). Humans use internal models to estimate gravity and linear acceleration. Nature, 398, 615–618. doi:10.1038/19303
24.
NiederA.DehaeneS. (2009). Representation of number in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 32, 185–208. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135550
25.
PaganiL. S.FitzpatrickC.ArchambaultI.JanoszM. (2010). School readiness and later achievement: A French Canadian replication and extension. Developmental Psychology, 46, 984–994. doi:10.1037/a0018881
26.
PiagetJ. (1955). The construction of reality in the child. London, England: Routledge.
27.
PietersS.DesoeteA.Van WaelveldeH.VanderswalmenR.RoeyersH. (2012). Mathematical problems in children with developmental coordination disorder. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 33, 1128–1135. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2012.02.007
28.
R Core Team (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
29.
RitchieS. J.BatesT. C. (2013). Enduring links from childhood mathematics and reading achievement to adult socioeconomic status. Psychological Science, 24, 1301–1308. doi:10.1177/0956797612466268
30.
RoebersC. M.RöthlisbergerM.NeuenschwanderR.CimeliP.MichelE.JägerK. (2014). The relation between cognitive and motor performance and their relevance for children’s transition to school: A latent variable approach. Human Movement Science, 33, 284–297. doi:10.1016/j.humov.2013.08.011
31.
SonS.-H.MeiselsS. J. (2006). The relationship of young children’s motor skills to later school achievement. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52, 755–778. doi:10.1353/mpq.2006.0033
32.
SrinivasanM.CareyS. (2010). The long and the short of it: On the nature and origin of functional overlap between representations of space and time. Cognition, 116, 217–241. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.05.005
33.
SugdenD.WadeM. (2013). Typical and atypical motor development. London, England: Mac Keith Press.
34.
TinelliF.AnobileG.GoriM.Aagten-MurphyD.BartoliM.BurrD. C.. . . Concetta MorroneM. (2015). Time, number and attention in very low birth weight children. Neuropsychologia, 73, 60–69. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.04.016
35.
TresilianJ. R. (1999). Visually timed action: Time-out for ‘tau’?Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 301–310. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01352-2
36.
TresilianJ. (2012). Sensorimotor control & learning: An introduction to the behavioral neuroscience of action. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
37.
Van RooijenM.VerhoevenL.SteenbergenB. (2011). Early numeracy in cerebral palsy: Review and future research. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 53, 202–209. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2010.03834.x
38.
WalshV. (2003). A theory of magnitude: Common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 483–488. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2003.09.002
39.
WhiteO.DiedrichsenJ. (2010). Responsibility assignment in redundant systems. Current Biology, 20, 1290–1295. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.05.069
40.
WijdenesL. O.BrennerE.SmeetsJ. B. J. (2014). Online manual movement adjustments in response to target position changes and apparent target motion. Motor Control, 18, 44–54. doi:10.1123/mc.2012-0116
41.
WilsonM. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 625–636. doi:10.3758/BF03196322
42.
WolpertD. M.MiallR. C.KawatoM. (1998). Internal models in the cerebellum. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 338–347. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01221-2
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
