In this study, paradigms that test whether human infants make social attributions to simple moving shapes were adapted for use with bottlenose dolphins. The dolphins observed animated displays in which a target oval would falter while moving upward, and then either a “prosocial” oval would enter and help or caress it or an “antisocial” oval would enter and hinder or hit it. In subsequent displays involving all three shapes, when the pro- and antisocial ovals moved offscreen in opposite directions, the dolphins reliably predicted—based on anticipatory head turns when the target briefly moved behind an occluder—that the target oval would follow the prosocial one. When the roles of the pro- and antisocial ovals were reversed toward a new target, the animals’ continued success suggests that such attributions may be dyad specific. Some of the dolphins also directed high arousal behaviors toward these displays, further supporting that they were socially interpreted.
AtsumiT.KodaH.MasatakaN. (2017). Goal attribution to inanimate moving objects by Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata). Scientific Reports, 7, Article 40033. doi:10.1038/srep40033
2.
BruckJ. N. (2013). Decades-long social memory in bottlenose dolphins. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 280, Article 20131726. doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.1726
3.
BureshJ. S.WoodwardA. (2007). Infants track action goals within and across agents. Cognition, 104, 287–314.
4.
BurkartJ.KupferbergA.GlauserS.van SchaikC. (2012). Even simple forms of social learning rely on intention attribution in marmoset monkeys (Callithris jacchus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 126, 129–138. doi:10.1037/a0026025
5.
CaldwellM. C.CaldwellD. K. (1966). Epimeletic (care-giving) behavior in cetacea. In NorrisK. S. (Ed.), Whales, dolphins & porpoises (pp. 755–789). Berkeley: University of California Press.
6.
ConnorR. C.HeithausR. M.BarreL. M. (1999). Super-alliance of bottlenose dolphins. Nature, 371, 571–572.
7.
ConnorR. C.NorrisK. S. (1982). Are dolphins reciprocal altruists?The American Naturalist, 119, 358–374.
8.
CotterM. P.MaldiniD.JeffersonT. A. (2012). “Porpicide” in California: Killing of harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena) by coastal bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). Marine Mammal Science, 28, E1–E15.
9.
CsibraG.BíróS.KoósO.GergelyG. (2003). One-year-old infants use teleological representations of actions productively. Cognitive Science, 27, 111–133.
10.
CsibraG.GergelyG.BíróS.KoósO.BrockbankM. (1999). Goal attribution without agency cues: The perception of ‘pure reason’ in infancy. Cognition, 72, 237–267.
11.
de WaalF. B. M. (1986). Dynamics of social relationships. In SmutsB. B.CheneyD. L.SeyfarthR. M.WranghamR. W.StruhsakerT. T. (Eds.), Primate societies (pp. 421–430). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12.
DudzinskiK. M.SakaiM.MasakiK.KogiK.HishiiT.KurimotoM. (2003). Behavioural observations of bottlenose dolphins toward two dead conspecifics. Aquatic Mammals, 29, 108–116.
13.
FawcettC.LiszkowskiU. (2012). Infants anticipate others’ social preferences. Infant and Child Development, 21, 239–249.
14.
GazdaS. K.ConnorR. C.EdgarR. K.CoxF. (2005). A division of labour with role specialization in group–hunting bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) off Cedar Key, Florida. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 272, 135–140.
15.
GelmanR. (1990). First principles to organize attention to and learning about relevant data: Number and the animate-inanimate distinctions as examples. Cognitive Science, 14, 79–106.
16.
GergelyG.NádasdyZ.CsibraG.BíróS. (1995). Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age. Cognition, 56, 165–193.
17.
GisburneT. J.ConnorR. C. (2015). Group size and feeding success in strand-feeding bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in Bull Creek, South Carolina. Marine Mammal Science, 31, 1252–1257.
18.
HamlinJ. K.WynnK. (2011). Young infants prefer prosocial to antisocial others. Cognitive Development, 26, 30–39.
19.
HamlinJ. K.WynnK.BloomP. (2007). Social evaluation by pre-verbal infants. Nature, 450, 557–560.
20.
HankeW.ErdsackN. (2015). Ecology and evolution of dolphin sensory systems. In HerzingD. L.JohnsonC. M. (Eds.), Dolphin communication and cognition: Past, present, and future (pp. 49–74). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
HermanL. M.HovancikJ. R.GoryJ. D.BradshawG. L. (1989). Generalization of visual matching by a bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncates): Evidence for invariance of cognitive performance with visual or auditory materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 15, 124–136.
22.
HermanL. M.Morrel-SamuelsP.PackA. A. (1990). Bottlenosed dolphin and human recognition of veridical and degraded video displays of an artificial gestural language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 215–230.
23.
HerzingD. L. (1996). Vocalizations and associated underwater behavior of free-ranging Atlantic spotted dolphins, Stenella frontalis, and bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops truncatus. Aquatic Mammals, 22, 61–80.
24.
JanikV. M.SayighL. S. (2013). Communication in bottlenose dolphins: 50 years of signature whistle research. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 199, 479–489.
25.
JohnsonC. M. (2015). The cognitive ecology of dolphin social engagement. In HerzingD. L.JohnsonC. M. (Eds.), Dolphin communication and cognition: Past, present, and future (pp. 229–256). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26.
JohnsonC. M.SullivanJ.BuckC. L.TrexelJ.ScarpuzziM. (2015). Object permanence and invisible displacement with dynamic visual occlusion in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops spp). Animal Cognition, 18, 179–193.
27.
KuhlmeierV. (2013). The social perception of helping and hindering. In RutherfordM. D. (Ed.), Social perception: Detection and interpretation of animacy, agency and intention (pp. 283–303). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28.
KuhlmeierV.WynnK.BloomP. (2003). Attribution of dispositional states by 12-month-olds. Psychological Science, 14, 402–408.
29.
LuoY. (2011). Three-month-old infants attribute goals to a non-human agent. Developmental Science, 14, 453–460.
30.
LuoY.BaillargeonR. (2005). Can a self-propelled box have a goal?Psychological Science, 16, 601–608.
31.
MandlerJ. (1992). How to build a baby, II: Conceptual primitives. Psychological Review, 99, 587–604.
32.
PackA. (2015). Experimental studies of dolphin cognitive abilities. In HerzingD. L.JohnsonC. M. (Eds.), Dolphin communication and cognition: Past, present, and future (pp. 175–200). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33.
PremackD.PremackA. J. (1997). Infants attribute value± to the goal-directed actions of self-propelled objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 845–856.
34.
RakisonD. H.Poulin-DuboisD. (2001). Developmental origin of the animate-inanimate distinction. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 209–238.
35.
RochatM. J.SerraE.FadigaL.GalleseV. (2008). The evolution of social cognition: Goal familiarity shapes monkeys’ action understanding. Current Biology, 18, 227–232.
36.
SeyfarthR. M.CheneyD. L. (2003). The structure of social knowledge in monkeys. In de WaalF. B. M.TyackP. (Eds.), Animal social complexity: Intelligence, culture, and individualized societies (pp. 207–229). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37.
SpelkeE. S.PhillipsA.WoodwardA. L. (1995). Infants’ knowledge of object motion and human action. In SperberD.PremackD.PremackA. J. (Eds.), Causal cognition (pp. 44–78). Oxford, England: Clarendon.
38.
UllerC. (2004). Disposition to recognize goals in infant chimpanzees. Animal Cognition, 7, 154–161.
39.
VaishA.GrossmanT.WoodwardA. (2008). Not all emotions are created equal: The negativity bias in social-emotional development. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 383–403.
40.
WellsR. S. (2003). Dolphin social complexity: Lessons from long-term study and life history. In de WaalF. B. M.TyackP. L. (Eds.), Animal social complexity (pp. 32–56). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
