Prospective, longitudinal analyses revealed that over a 12-year period from ages 6 to 18, individuals who grew up with mothers with more proenvironmental attitudes engaged in more proenvironmental behavior as young adults. A similar marginal association was uncovered between mothers’ proenvironmental behaviors and the proenvironmental behavior of their young adult offspring. Maternal educational attainment, but not political ideology, was also associated with more proenvironmental behavior as children matured. Moreover, childhood time spent outdoors was positively associated with increased environmentally responsible behavior in young adulthood. Interestingly, one’s own childhood proenvironmental behavior and attitude, at least as assessed at age 6, bear little on one’s eventual proenvironmental behavior as a young adult. Finally, among this set of childhood factors, maternal education and childhood time spent outdoors were independent predictors of positive changes in environmental behavior from early childhood to young adulthood.
AdamsR. J.WuM. L.WilsonM. R. (2015). ACER ConQuest: Generalised Item Response Modelling Software (Version 4) [Computer software]. Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research.
2.
ArnoldO.KaiserF. G. (2016). Understanding the foot-in-the-door effect as a pseudo-effect from the perspective of the Campbell paradigm. International Journal of Psychology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1002/ijop.12289
3.
ArnoldO.KibbeA.HartigT.KaiserF. G. (2017). Capturing the environmental impact of individual lifestyles: Evidence of the criterion validity of the General Ecological Behavior scale. Environment and Behavior. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0013916517701796
4.
ArnoldO.KibbeA.VetterM.AdlerM.KaiserF. G. (2017). Sustainable travel behavior within the Campbell paradigm: Compensatory effects of environmental attitude and the transportation environment. Manuscript submitted for publication.
5.
BambergS.MöserG. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 14–25.
6.
BanduraA.SchunkD. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 586–598.
7.
Boeve-de PauwJ.Van PetegemP. (2013). A cross-cultural study of environmental values and their effect on the environmental behavior of children. Environment and Behavior, 45, 551–583.
8.
BondT. G.FoxC. M. (2001). Applying the Rasch model. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9.
ByrkaK.KaiserF. G.OlkoJ. (2017). Understanding the acceptance of nature-preservation-related restrictions as the result of the compensatory effects of environmental attitude and behavioral costs. Environment and Behavior, 49, 487–508.
10.
ChawlaL.DerrV. (2012). The development of conservation behaviors in childhood and youth. In ClaytonS. D. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (pp. 527–555). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
11.
ColladoS.EvansG. W.CorralizaJ. A.SorrelM. A. (2015). The role played by age on children’s pro-ecological behaviors: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 44, 85–94.
12.
DeFleurM. L.WestieF. R. (1963). Attitude as a scientific concept. Social Forces, 42, 17–31.
13.
DeLeeuwA.ValoisP.AjzenI.SchmidtP. (2015). Using the theory of planned behavior to identify key beliefs underlying pro-environmental behavior in high-school students: Implications for environmental interventions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42, 128–138.
14.
DunlapR. E. (2008). The New Environmental Paradigm scale: From marginality to worldwide use. The Journal of Environmental Education, 40, 3–18.
15.
DunlapR. E.Van LiereK. D.MertigA. G.JonesR. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 425–442.
16.
EvansG. W.BrauchleG.HaqA.SteckerR.WongK.ShapiroE. (2007). Young children’s environmental attitudes and behaviors. Environment and Behavior, 39, 635–659.
17.
EvansG. W.JuenB.Corral-VerdugoV.CorralizaJ. A.KaiserF. G. (2007). Children’s cross-cultural environmental attitudes and behaviors. Children, Youth and Environments, 17, 128–143.
18.
GiffordR.NilssonA. (2014). Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behavior: A review. International Journal of Psychology, 3, 141–157.
19.
GrønhøjA.ThøgersenJ. (2009). Like father, like son? Intergenerational transmission of values, attitudes, and behaviors in the environmental domain. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 414–421.
20.
GrønhøjA.ThøgersenJ. (2012). Action speaks louder than words: The effect of personal attitudes and family norms on adolescents’ pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33, 292–302.
21.
HinesJ. M.HungerfordH. R.TomeraA. N. (1986). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Environmental Education, 18, 1–8.
22.
KaiserF. G. (1998). A general measure of ecological behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 395–422.
23.
KaiserF. G.ByrkaK.HartigT. (2010). Reviving Campbell’s paradigm for attitude research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 351–367.
24.
KaiserF. G.FrickJ.Stoll-KleemannS. (2001). Zur angemessenheit selbstberichteten verhaltens: Eine validitätsuntersuchung der skala allgemeinen ökologischen verhaltens [Accuracy of self-reports: Validating the General Ecological Behavior scale]. Diagnostica, 47, 88–95.
25.
KaiserF. G.HartigT.BrüggerA.DuvierC. (2013). Environmental protection and nature as distinct attitudinal objects: An application of the Campbell Paradigm. Environment and Behavior, 45, 369–389.
26.
KaiserF. G.WilsonM. (2000). Assessing people’s general ecological behavior: A cross-cultural measure. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 952–978.
27.
KaiserF. G.WilsonM. (2004). Goal-directed conservation behavior: The specific composition of a general performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1531–1544.
28.
KormosC.GiffordR. (2014). The validity of self-report measures of proenvironmental behavior: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 359–371.
29.
MatthiesE.SelgeS.KlöcknerC. (2012). The role of parental behaviour for the development of behavior specific environmental norms—The example of recycling and re-use behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32, 277–284.
30.
MeinholdJ. L.MarkusA. J. (2005). Adolescent environmental behaviors: Can knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy make a difference?Environment and Behavior, 37, 511–532.
31.
MislevyR. J. (1991). Randomization-based inference about latent variables from complex samples. Psychometrika, 56, 177–196.
32.
MüllerK.KalsE.PansaR. (2009). Adolescents’ emotional affinity toward nature: A cross-societal study. Journal of Developmental Processes, 4, 59–69.
33.
OttoS.PensiniP. (2017). Nature-based environmental education of children: Environmental knowledge and connectedness to nature, together, are related to ecological behavior. Global Environmental Change, 47, 88–94.
34.
WellsN. M.LekiesK. S. (2006). Nature and the life course: Pathways from childhood nature experiences to adult environmentalism. Children, Youth and Environments, 16(1), 1–24.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
