Is consciousness necessary for integration? Findings of seemingly high-level object-scene integration in the absence of awareness have challenged major theories in the field and attracted considerable scientific interest. Lately, one of these findings has been questioned because of a failure to replicate, yet the other finding was still uncontested. Here, we show that this latter finding—slowed-down performance on a visible target following a masked prime scene that includes an incongruent object—is also not reproducible. Using Bayesian statistics, we found evidence against unconscious integration of objects and scenes. Put differently, at the moment, there is no compelling evidence for object-scene congruency processing in the absence of awareness. Intriguingly, however, our results do suggest that consciously experienced yet briefly presented incongruent scenes take longer to process, even when subjects do not explicitly detect their incongruency.
BaarsB. J. (2005). Global workspace theory of consciousness: Toward a cognitive neuroscience of human experience. Progress in Brain Research, 150, 45–53.
BrainardD. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436.
4.
BreitmeyerB. G.OgmenH. (2000). Recent models and findings in visual backward masking: A comparison, review, and update. Perception and Psychophysics, 62, 1572–1595.
5.
CummingG. (2014). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science, 25, 7–29.
6.
DehaeneS.NaccacheL. (2001). Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: Basic evidence and a workspace framework. Cognition, 79, 1–37.
7.
DienesZ. (2011). Bayesian versus orthodox statistics: Which side are you on?Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 274–290.
8.
FaivreN.KochC. (2014). Inferring the direction of implied motion depends on visual awareness. Journal of Vision, 14(4), Article 4. doi:10.1167/14.4.4
9.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160.
10.
Gelbard-SagivH.FaivreN.MudrikL.KochC. (2016). Low-level awareness accompanies “unconscious” high-level processing during continuous flash suppression. Journal of Vision, 16(1), Article 3. doi:10.1167/16.1.3
11.
GlanemannR.ZwitserloodP.BölteJ.DobelC. (2016). Rapid apprehension of the coherence of action scenes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 1566–1575.
12.
GreeneM. R.BotrosA. P.BeckD. M.Fei-FeiL. (2015). What you see is what you expect: Rapid scene understanding benefits from prior experience. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77, 1239–1251.
13.
HarrisJ. J.SchwarzkopD. S.SongC.BahramiB.ReesG. (2011). Contextual illusions reveal the limit of unconscious visual processing. Psychological Science, 22, 399–405.
14.
IzattG.DuboisJ.FaivreN.KochC. (2014). A direct comparison of unconscious face processing under masking and interocular suppression. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 659. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00659
15.
KochC.TononiG. (2011). A test for consciousness. Scientific American, 304(6), 44–47.
16.
KouiderS.DupouxE. (2004). Partial awareness creates the “illusion” of subliminal semantic priming. Psychological Science, 15, 75–81.
17.
LeeM. D.WagenmakersE. J. (2013). Bayesian cognitive modeling: A practical course. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
18.
LevittH. (1971). Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49, 467–477.
19.
MacknikS. L.LivingstoneM. S. (1998). Neuronal correlates of visibility and invisibility in the primate visual system. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 144–149.
20.
MoorsP.BoelensD.van OverwalleJ.WagemansJ. (2016). Scene integration without awareness: No conclusive evidence for processing scene congruency during continuous flash suppression.Psychological Science, 27, 945–956.
21.
MoreyR. D. (2008). Confidence intervals from normalized data: A correction to Cousineau (2005). Tutorial in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4(2), 61–64.
MudrikL.BreskaA.LamyD.DeouellL. Y. (2011). Integration without awareness: Expanding the limits of unconscious processing. Psychological Science, 22, 764–770.
24.
MudrikL.FaivreN.KochC. (2014). Information integration without awareness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 488–496.
25.
MudrikL.KochC. (2013). Differential processing of invisible congruent and incongruent scenes: A case for unconscious integration. Journal of Vision, 13(13), Article 24. doi:10.1167/13.13.24
26.
MudrikL.LamyD.DeouellL. Y. (2010). ERP evidence for context congruity effects during simultaneous object-scene processing. Neuropsychologia, 48, 507–517.
27.
MunafòM. R.NosekB. A.BishopD. V.ButtonK. S.ChambersC. D.du SertN. P.. . . IoannidisJ. P. (2017). A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature Human Behaviour, 1, 0021. doi:10.1038/s41562-016-0021
28.
PeremenZ.LamyD. (2014). Comparing unconscious processing during continuous flash suppression and meta-contrast masking just under the limen of consciousness. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 969. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00969
29.
PrinsN.KingdomF. A. A. (2009). Palamedes: Matlab routines for analyzing psychophysical data. Retrieved from http://www.palamedestoolbox.org
30.
RamsyT. Z.OvergaardM. (2004). Introspection and subliminal perception. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 3(1), 1–23.
31.
R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org
32.
ShanksD. R. (2017). Regressive research: The pitfalls of post hoc data selection in the study of unconscious mental processes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24, 752–775.
33.
SimonsohnU. (2015). Small telescopes: Detectability and the evaluation of replication results. Psychological Science, 26, 559–569.
34.
StanislawH.TodorovN. (1999). Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 137–149.
35.
SteinT.HebartM. N.SterzerP. (2011). Breaking continuous flash suppression: A new measure of unconscious processing during interocular suppression?Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 167. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00167
36.
TononiG.BolyM.MassiminiM.KochC. (2016). Integrated information theory: From consciousness to its physical substrate. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17, 450–461.
37.
TononiG.EdelmanG. M. (1998). Consciousness and complexity. Science, 282, 1846–1851.
38.
TorralbaA.OlivaA.CastelhanoM. S.HendersonJ. M. (2006). Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: The role of global features in object search. Psychological Review, 113, 766–786.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1971). Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 105–110.
41.
Yuval-GreenbergS.HeegerD. J. (2013). Continuous flash suppression modulates cortical activity in early visual cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 9635–9643.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
