AlbertJ.ChibS. (1997). Bayesian tests and model diagnostics in conditionally independent hierarchical models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 92, 916–925.
2.
ArahO. A. (2008). The role of causal reasoning in understanding Simpson’s paradox, Lord’s paradox, and the suppression effect: Covariate selection in the analysis of observational studies. Emerging Themes in Epidemiology, 5, Article 5. doi:10.1186/1742-7622-5-5
3.
BorensteinM.HedgesL. V.HigginsJ. P. T.RothsteinH. R. (2010). A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 1, 97–111.
4.
CarlssonR.SchimmackU.WilliamsD. R.BürknerP.-C. (2017). Bayes factors from pooled data are no substitute for Bayesian meta-analysis: Commentary on Scheibehenne, Jamil, and Wagenmakers (2016). Psychological Science, 28, 1694–1697.
5.
FragosoT. M.NetoF. L. (2015). Bayesian model averaging: A systematic review and conceptual classification. Cornell University Library arXiv.org. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/1509.08864
6.
GronauQ. F.van ErpS.HeckD. W.CesarioJ.JonasK.WagenmakersE.-J. (2017). A Bayesian model-averaged meta-analysis of the power pose effect with informed and default priors: The case of felt power. Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 2, 123–138.
7.
GrünwaldP. D.MyungI. J.PittM. A. (2005). Advances in minimum description length: Theory and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8.
HoetingJ. A.MadiganD.RafteryA. E.VolinskyC. T. (1999). Bayesian model averaging: A tutorial. Statistical Science, 14, 382–417.
9.
JeffreysH. (1961). Theory of probability (3rd ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
10.
MengX.-L.WongW. H. (1996). Simulating ratios of normalizing constants via a simple identity: A theoretical exploration. Statistica Sinica, 6, 831–860.
11.
MorenoE.Vázquez-PoloF. J.NegrínM. A. (2017). Bayesian meta-analysis: The role of the between-sample heterogeneity. Statistical Methods in Medical Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0962280217709837
12.
MyungI. J. (2000). The importance of complexity in model selection. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44, 190–204.
13.
PearlJ. (2009). Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference (2nd ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
14.
PearlJ. (2014). Comment: Understanding Simpson’s paradox. The American Statistician, 68, 8–13.
15.
RiceK.HigginsJ. P. T.LumleyT. (2017). A re-evaluation of fixed effect(s) meta-analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A: Statistics in Society. Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/rssa.12275
16.
ScheibehenneB.JamilT.WagenmakersE.-J. (2016). Bayesian evidence synthesis can reconcile seemingly inconsistent results: The case of hotel towel reuse. Psychological Science, 27, 1043–1046. doi:10.1177/0956797616644081
17.
SilberzahnR.UhlmannE. L. (2015). Crowdsourced research: Many hands make tight work. Nature, 526, 189–191.
18.
SuttonA. J.AbramsK. R. (2001). Bayesian methods in meta-analysis and evidence synthesis. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 10, 277–303.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
