Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

At the end of a diet, even a successful one, people often return to overeating. One potential reason is that the behavioral inhibition that people learn while dieting might not readily transfer outside the context in which it is learned: Basic research indicates that after a behavior is inhibited, a return to the conditioning context or simple removal from the treatment context can cause the behavior to return (i.e., to renew). Can states of hunger and satiety play the role of context? In two experiments, rats learned a food-seeking response that earned sucrose or sweet, fatty food pellets while they were satiated. Responding was then inhibited (i.e., extinguished) while the rats were hungry. On the rats’ return to the satiated state, their food seeking was renewed. Additional results suggest that associations with hunger or satiety stimuli were learned more readily than associations with other potentially useful exteroceptive stimuli. The findings have implications for understanding the role of interoceptive contexts in controlling the inhibition of motivated behavior.

Keywords

hunger relapse renewal context behavioral inhibition open data

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bolles

R. C.

(1975). Theory of motivation (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Harper & Row.

Boutelle

K. N.

Bouton

M. E.

(2015). Implications of learning theory to develop programs to decrease overeating. Appetite, 93, 62–74.

Bouton

M. E.

(2002). Context, ambiguity, and unlearning: Sources of relapse after behavioral extinction. Biological Psychiatry, 52, 976–986.

Bouton

M. E.

(2004). Context and behavioral processes in extinction. Learning & Memory, 11, 485–494.

Bouton

M. E.

(2010). The multiple forms of “context” in associative learning theory. In Mesquita

Feldman Barrett

Smith

(Eds.), The mind in context (pp. 233–258). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Bouton

M. E.

(2011). Learning and the persistence of appetite: Extinction and the motivation to eat and overeat. Physiology & Behavior, 103, 51–58.

Bouton

M. E.

(2014). Why behavior change is difficult to sustain. Preventive Medicine, 68, 29–36.

Bouton

M. E.

Todd

T. P.

(2014). A fundamental role for context in instrumental learning and extinction. Behavioural Processes, 104, 13–19.

Bouton

M. E.

Todd

T. P.

Vurbic

Winterbauer

N. E.

(2011). Renewal after the extinction of free operant behavior. Learning & Behavior, 39, 57–67.

10.

Bouton

M. E.

Trask

Carranza-Jasso

(2016). Learning to inhibit the response during instrumental (operant) extinction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 42, 246–258.

11.

Capaldi

E. D.

Viveiros

D. M.

Davidson

T. L.

(1981). Deprivation stimulus intensity and incentive factors in the control of instrumental responding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 7, 140–149.

12.

Davidson

T. L.

(1987). Learning about deprivation intensity stimuli. Behavioral Neuroscience, 101, 198–208.

13.

Davidson

T. L.

(1993). The nature and function of interoceptive signals to feed: Toward integration of physiological and learning perspectives. Psychological Review, 100, 640–657.

14.

Davidson

T. L.

Kanoski

S. E.

Tracy

A. L.

Walls

E. K.

Clegg

Benoit

S. C.

(2005). The interoceptive cue properties of ghrelin generalize to cues produced by food deprivation. Peptides, 26, 1602–1610.

15.

Elfhag

Rössner

(2005). Who succeeds in maintaining weight loss? A conceptual review of factors associated with weight loss maintenance and weight regain. Obesity Reviews, 6, 67–85.

16.

Hull

(1943). Principles of behavior. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

17.

Jansen

(2016). Eating disorders need more experimental psychopathology. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 86, 2–10.

18.

Kanoski

S. E.

Walls

E. K.

Davidson

T. L.

(2007). Interoceptive “satiety” signals produced by leptin and CCK. Peptides, 28, 988–1002.

19.

Nakajima

Tanaka

Urushihara

Imada

(2000). Renewal of extinguished lever-press responses upon return to the training context. Learning and Motivation, 31, 416–431.

20.

Polivy

Herman

C. P.

(1985). Dieting and binging: A causal analysis. American Psychologist, 40, 193–201.

21.

Polivy

Herman

C. P.

(2002). Causes of eating disorders. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 187–213.

22.

Rescorla

R. A.

(1997). Response inhibition in extinction. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 238–252.

23.

Sample

C. H.

Jones

Hargrave

S. L.

Jarrard

L. E.

Davidson

T. L.

(2016). Western diet and the weakening of the interoceptive stimulus control of appetitive behavior. Behavioural Brain Research, 312, 219–230.

24.

World Health Organization. (2016). Fact sheet: Obesity and overweight. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.13 MB

Hunger as a Context: Food Seeking That Is Inhibited During Hunger Can Renew in the Context of Satiety

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material