Evidence That an Ebola Outbreak Influenced Voting Preferences,Even After Controlling (Mindfully) for Autocorrelation: Reply to Tiokhin and Hruschka (2017)
Restricted accessOtherFirst published online September, 2017
Evidence That an Ebola Outbreak Influenced Voting Preferences,Even After Controlling (Mindfully) for Autocorrelation: Reply to Tiokhin and Hruschka (2017)
BeallA. T.HoferM. K.SchallerM. (2016). Infections and elections: Did an Ebola outbreak influence the 2014 U.S. federal elections (and if so, how)?Psychological Science, 27, 595–605.
2.
GigerenzerG. (2004). Mindless statistics. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 33, 587–606.
3.
JebbA. T.TayL.WangW.HuangQ. (2015). Time series analysis for psychological research: Examining and forecasting change. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 727. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00727
4.
ShawD. R. (1999). A study of presidential campaign event effects from 1952 to 1992. The Journal of Politics, 61, 387–422.
5.
TiokhinL.HruschkaD. (2017). No evidence that an Ebola outbreak influenced voting preferences in the 2014 elections after controlling for time-series autocorrelation: A Commentary on Beall, Hofer, and Schaller (2016). Psychological Science, 28, 1358–1360.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
