Evolutionary psychologists have proposed two processes that could give rise to the pervasiveness of human cooperation observed among individuals who are not genetically related: reciprocity and conformity. We tested whether reciprocity outperformed conformity in promoting cooperation, especially when these psychological processes would promote a different cooperative or noncooperative response. To do so, across three studies, we observed participants’ cooperation with a partner after learning (a) that their partner had behaved cooperatively (or not) on several previous trials and (b) that their group members had behaved cooperatively (or not) on several previous trials with that same partner. Although we found that people both reciprocate and conform, reciprocity has a stronger influence on cooperation. Moreover, we found that conformity can be partly explained by a concern about one’s reputation—a finding that supports a reciprocity framework.
AlpizarF.CarlssonF.Johansson-StenmanO. (2008). Anonymity, reciprocity, and conformity: Evidence from voluntary contributions to a national park in Costa Rica. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 1047–1060. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.11.004
2.
AschS. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 70, 1–70. doi:10.1037/h0093718
3.
BallietD.Van LangeP. A. M. (2013). Trust, conflict, and cooperation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 1090–1112. doi:10.1037/a0030939
4.
BealD. J.CohenR. R.BurkeM. J.McLendonC. L. (2003). Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 989–1004. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.989
5.
BostynD. H.RoetsA. (2016). An asymmetric moral conformity effect: Subjects conform to deontological but not consequentialist majorities. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 1, 1–8. doi:10.1177/1948550616671999
6.
BowlesS. (2009). Did warfare among ancestral hunter-gatherers affect the evolution of human social behaviors?Science, 324, 1293–1298. doi:10.1126/science.1168112
7.
BoydR.RichersonP. J. (2009). Culture and the evolution of human cooperation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364, 3281–3288. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0134
8.
CarpenterS.RadhakrishnanP. (2002). The relation between allocentrism and perceptions of ingroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1528–1537. doi:10.1177/014616702237580
9.
CartwrightE.GilletJ.Van VugtM. (2013). Leadership by example in the weak-link game. Economic Inquiry, 51, 2028–2043. doi:10.1111/ecin.12003
10.
CaslerK.BickelL.HackettE. (2013). Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon’s MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 2156–2160. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.009
11.
ChinW. W.SalisburyW. D.PearsonA. W.StollakM. J. (1999). Perceived cohesion in small groups adapting and testing the perceived cohesion scale in a small-group setting. Small Group Research, 30, 751–766. doi:10.1177/104649649903000605
12.
CosmidesL.ToobyJ. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange (pp. 163–228). In BarkowJ.CosmidesL.ToobyJ. (Eds.), The adapted mind. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
13.
CosmidesL.ToobyJ. (2005). Neurocognitive adaptations designed for social exchange. In BussD. M. (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 584–627). New York, NY: Wiley.
14.
DeltonA. W.CosmidesL.GuemoM.RobertsonT. E.ToobyJ. (2012). The psychosemantics of free riding: Dissecting the architecture of a moral concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1252–1270. doi:10.1037/a0027026
15.
DeltonA. W.KrasnowM. M.CosmidesL.ToobyJ. (2011). Evolution of direct reciprocity under uncertainty can explain human generosity in one-shot encounters. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 108, 13335–13340. doi:10.1073/pnas.1102131108
16.
DroletA. L.MorrisM. W. (2000). Rapport in conflict resolution: Accounting for how face-to-face contact fosters mutual cooperation in mixed-motive conflicts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 26–50. doi:10.1006/jesp.1999.1395
17.
EvansC. R.DionK. L. (1991). Group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis. Small Group Research, 22, 175–186. doi:10.1177/1046496491222002
18.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
19.
HenrichJ. (2004). Cultural group selection, coevolutionary processes and large-scale cooperation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 53, 3–35. doi:10.1016/S0167-2681(03)00094-5
20.
HenrichJ.BoydR. (1998). The evolution of conformist transmission and the emergence of between-group differences. Evolution & Human Behavior, 19, 215–241. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(98)00018-X
21.
HenrichJ.BoydR. (2001). Why people punish defectors: Weak conformist transmission can stabilize costly enforcement of norms in cooperative dilemmas. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 208, 79–89. doi:10.1006/jtbi.2000.2202
22.
HenrichJ.BoydR. (2016). How evolved psychological mechanisms empower cultural group selection. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 33, 28–29. doi:10.1017/S0140525X15000138
23.
HenrichJ.ChudekM.BoydR. (2015). The Big Man mechanism: How prestige fosters cooperation and creates prosocial leaders. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 370, Article 20150013. doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0013
24.
HenrichJ.Gil-WhiteF. J. (2001). The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution & Human Behavior, 22, 165–196. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(00)00071-4
25.
KrasnowM. M.DeltonA. W.CosmidesL.ToobyJ. (2016). Looking under the hood of third-party punishment reveals design for personal benefit. Psychological Science, 27, 1–14. doi:10.1177/0956797615624469
26.
LaporteL.van NimwegenC.UyttendaeleA. J. (2010). Do people say what they think: Social conformity behavior in varying degrees of online social presence. In BlandfordA.GulliksenJ.HvannbergE. T.LarusdottirM. K.LawE. L.-C.VilhjalmssonH. H. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 305–314). New York, NY: ACM Press.
27.
MeleadyR.HopthrowT.CrispR. J. (2013). Simulating social dilemmas: Promoting cooperative behavior through imagined group discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 839–853. doi:10.1037/a0031233
28.
NookE. C.OngD. C.MorelliS. A.MitchellJ. P.ZakiJ. (2016). Prosocial conformity: prosocial norms generalize across behavior and empathy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 1045–1062. doi:10.1177/0146167216649932
PanchanathanK.BoydR. (2004). Indirect reciprocity can stabilize cooperation without the second-order free rider problem. Nature, 432, 499–502. doi:10.1038/nature02978
31.
PaolacciG.ChandlerJ. (2014). Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 184–188. doi:10.1177/0963721414531598
32.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
33.
RichersonP.BaldiniR.BellA.DempsK.FrostK.HillisV.. . . ZeffermanM. (2015). Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: A sketch of the evidence. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 39, Article e30. doi:10.1017/S0140525X1400106X
34.
RichersonP. J.BoydR. (2001). The evolution of subjective commitment to groups: A tribal instincts hypothesis. In NesseR. M. (Ed.), Evolution and the capacity for commitment (pp. 186–220). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
35.
Van LangeP. A. M.KuhlmanD. M. (1994). Social value orientations and impressions of partner’s honesty and intelligence: A test of the might versus morality effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 126–141. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.1.126
36.
WuJ.BallietD.Van LangeP. A. (2015). When does gossip promote generosity? Indirect reciprocity under the shadow of the future. Social Psychological & Personality Science, 6, 923–930. doi:10.1177/1948550615595272
37.
WuJ.BallietD.Van LangeP. A. (2016). Reputation management: Why and how gossip enhances generosity. Evolution & Human Behavior, 37, 193–201. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.11.001
38.
ZaccaroS. J.McCoyM. C. (1988). The effects of task and interpersonal cohesiveness on performance of a disjunctive group task. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 837–851. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb01178.x
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
