Do boys produce more terms than girls to describe the spatial world—that is, dimensional adjectives (e.g., big, little, tall, short), shape terms (e.g., circle, square), and words describing spatial features and properties (e.g., bent, curvy, edge)? If a sex difference in children’s spatial-language use exists, is it related to the spatial language that parents use when interacting with children? We longitudinally tracked the development of spatial-language production in children between the ages of 14 and 46 months in a diverse sample of 58 parent-child dyads interacting in their homes. Boys produced and heard more of these three categories of spatial words, which we call “what” spatial types (i.e., unique “what” spatial words), but not more of all other word types, than girls. Mediation analysis revealed that sex differences in children’s spatial talk at 34 to 46 months of age were fully mediated by parents’ earlier spatial-language use, when children were 14 to 26 months old, time points at which there was no sex difference in children’s spatial-language use.
BaronR. M.KennyD. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
2.
CalderaY. M.HustonA. C.O’BrienM. (1985). Social interactions and play patterns of parents and toddlers with feminine, masculine, and neutral toys. Child Development, 60, 70–76. doi:10.2307/1131072
3.
CampenniC. E. (1999). Gender stereotyping of children’s toys: A comparison of parents and nonparents. Sex Roles, 40, 121–138. doi:10.1023/A:1018886518834
ChengY. L.MixK. S. (2014). Spatial training improves children’s mathematics ability. Journal of Cognition and Development, 15, 2–11. doi:10.1080/15248372.2012.725186
6.
CherneyI. D.VoyerD. (2010). Development of a spatial activity questionnaire I: Items identification. Sex Roles, 62, 89–99. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9710-9
7.
CostalesA.AbadC.OdeanR.PrudenS. M. (2015). Spatial activities and manipulatives for early education classrooms. In ScarlettW. G. (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of classroom management (pp. 768–771). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
DearingE.CaseyB. M.GanleyC. M.TillingerM.LaskiE.MontecilloC. (2012). Young girls’ arithmetic and spatial skills: The distal and proximal roles of family socioeconomics and home learning experiences. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27, 458–470. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2012.01.002
9.
DessalegnB.LandauB. (2013). Interaction between language and vision: It’s momentary, abstract, and it develops. Cognition, 127, 331–344. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.003
10.
FerrarraK.Hirsh-PasekK.NewcombeN. S.GolinkoffR. M.LamW. S. (2011). Block talk: Spatial language during block play. Mind, Brain, and Education, 5, 143–151. doi:10.1111/j.1751-228X.2011.01122.x
11.
FisherK. R.Hirsh-PasekK.NewcombeN.GolinkoffR. M. (2013). Talking shape: Supporting preschoolers’ acquisition of geometric knowledge through guided play. Child Development, 84, 1872–1878. doi:10.1111/cdev.12091
12.
FrickA.HansenM. A.NewcombeN. S. (2013). Development of mental rotation in 3- to 5-year-old children. Cognitive Development, 28, 386–399. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2013.06.002
13.
GentnerD.ÖzyürekA.GürcanliO.Goldin-MeadowS. (2013). Spatial language facilitates spatial cognition: Evidence from children who lack language input. Cognition, 127, 318–330. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.01.003
14.
GundersonE. A.LevineS. C. (2011). Some types of parent number talk count more than others: Relations between parents’ input and children’s cardinal-number knowledge. Developmental Science, 14, 1021–1032. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01050.x
15.
GundersonE. A.RamirezG.BeilockS. L.LevineS. C. (2012). The relation between spatial skill and early number knowledge: The role of the linear number line. Developmental Psychology, 48, 1229–1241. doi:10.1037/a0027433
16.
HartB.RisleyT. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday experience of young American children. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.
17.
Hoff-GinsbergE. (1998). The relation of birth order and socioeconomic status to children’s language experience and language development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 603–629. doi:10.1017/S0142716400010389
18.
HuttenlocherJ.HaightW.BrykA.SeltzerM.LyonsT. (1991). Early vocabulary growth: Relation to language input and gender. Developmental Psychology, 27, 236–248. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.27.2.236
19.
HuttenlocherJ.VasilyevaM.WaterfallH. R.VeveaJ.HedgesL. V. (2007). The varieties of speech to young children. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1062–1083. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.5.1062
JiroutJ. J.NewcombeN. S. (2015). Building blocks for developing spatial skills: Evidence from a large, representative U.S. sample. Psychological Science, 26, 302–310. doi:10.1177/0956797614563338
22.
KershJ.CaseyB. M.YoungJ. M. (2008). Research on spatial skills and block building in girls and boys. In SarachoO. N.SpodekB. (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on mathematics in early childhood education (pp. 233–251). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
23.
LandauB.JackendoffR. (1993). “What” and “where” in spatial language and spatial cognition. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 16, 217–265. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00029733
24.
LevineS. C.FoleyA.LourencoS.EhrlichS.RatliffK. (2016). Sex differences in spatial cognition: Advancing the conversation. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 7, 127–155. doi:10.1002/wcs.1380
25.
LevineS. C.HuttenlocherJ.TaylorA.LangrockA. (1999). Early sex differences in spatial skill. Developmental Psychology, 35, 940–949. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.35.4.940
26.
LevineS. C.RatliffK. R.HuttenlocherJ.CannonD. (2012). Early puzzle play: A predictor of preschoolers’ spatial transformation skill. Developmental Psychology, 48, 530–542. doi:10.1037/a0025913
27.
LevineS. C.VasilyevaM.LourencoS. F.NewcombeN. S.HuttenlocherJ. (2005). Socioeconomic status modifies the sex difference in spatial skill. Psychological Science, 16, 841–845. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01623.x
28.
LinnM. C.PetersenA. C. (1985). Emergence and charact-erization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479–1498. doi:10.2307/1130467
29.
MooreD. S.JohnsonS. P. (2008). Mental rotation in human infants: A sex difference. Psychological Science, 19, 1063–1066. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02200.x
30.
NazarethA.HerreraA.PrudenS. M. (2013). Explaining sex differences in mental rotation: Role of spatial activity experience. Cognitive Processing, 14, 201–204. doi:10.1007/s10339-013-0542-8
31.
PetersenL.LevineS. C. (2015, March). The role of spontaneous block play on children’s math knowledge. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research on Child Development, Philadelphia, PA.
32.
PreacherK. J.HayesA. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 717–731. doi:10.3758/BF03206553
33.
PrudenS. M.LevineS. C.HuttenlocherJ. (2011). Children’s spatial thinking: Does talk about the spatial world matter?Developmental Science, 14, 1417–1430. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01088.x
34.
PyersJ. E.ShustermanA.SenghasA.SpelkeE. S.EmmoreyK. (2010). Evidence from an emerging sign language reveals that language supports spatial cognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 107, 12116–12120. doi:10.1073/pnas.0914044107
35.
QuinnP. C.LibenL. S. (2008). A sex difference in mental rotation in young infants. Psychological Science, 19, 1067–1070. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02201.x
36.
RoweM. L.Goldin-MeadowS. (2009). Differences in early gesture explain SES disparities in child vocabulary size at school entry. Science, 323, 951–953. doi:10.1126/science.1167025
37.
SarachoO. N. (1994). The relationship of preschool children’s cognitive style to their play preferences. Early Child Development and Care, 97, 21–33. doi:10.1080/0300443940970103
38.
ShustermanA.Ah LeeS.SpelkeE. S. (2011). Cognitive effects of language on human navigation. Cognition, 120, 186–201. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.04.004
39.
VerdineB. N.GolinkoffR. M.Hirsh-PasekK.NewcombeN. S.FilipowiczA. T.ChangA. (2014). Deconstructing building blocks: Preschoolers’ spatial assembly performance relates to early mathematical skills. Child Development, 85, 1062–1076. doi:10.1111/cdev.12165
40.
VerdineB. N.LuccaK. R.GolinkoffR. M.Hirsh-PasekK.NewcombeN. S. (2016). The shape of things: The origin of young children’s knowledge of the names and properties of geometric forms. Journal of Cognition and Development, 17, 142–161. doi:10.1080/15248372.2015.1016610
41.
VoyerD.VoyerS.BrydenM. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250–270. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.250
42.
WaiJ.LubinskiD.BenbowC. P.SteigerJ. H. (2010). Accomplishment in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) and its relation to STEM educational dose: A 25-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 860–871. doi:10.1037/a0019454
43.
WalkerD.GreenwoodC.HartB.CartaJ. (1994). Prediction of school outcomes based on early language production and socioeconomic factors. Child Development, 65, 606–621. doi:10.2307/1131404
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
