Across four studies, we used mouse tracking to identify the dynamic, on-line cognitive processes that underlie successful self-control decisions. First, we showed that individuals display real-time conflict when choosing options consistent with their long-term goal over short-term temptations. Second, we found that individuals who are more successful at self-control—whether measured or manipulated—show significantly less real-time conflict in only self-control-relevant choices. Third, we demonstrated that successful individuals who choose a long-term goal over a short-term temptation display movements that are smooth rather than abrupt, which suggests dynamic rather than stage-based resolution of self-control conflicts. These findings have important implications for contemporary theories of self-control.
AinslieG. (1975). Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 463–496. doi:10.1037/h0076860
2.
ChenG.GullyS. M.EdenD. (2001). Validation of a new General Self-Efficacy Scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 62–83. doi:10.1177/109442810141004
3.
ChengJ.González-VallejoC. (2015). Action dynamics in intertemporal choice reveal different facets of decision process. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 30, 107–122. doi:10.1002/bdm.1923
4.
CritcherC. R.FergusonM. J. (2016). “Whether I like it or not, it’s important”: Implicit importance of means predicts self-regulatory persistence and success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 818–839. doi:10.1037/pspa0000053
5.
DaleR.KehoeC.SpiveyM. J. (2007). Graded motor responses in the time course of categorizing atypical exemplars. Memory & Cognition, 35, 15–28. doi:10.3758/BF03195938
6.
FergusonM. J. (2007). On the automatic evaluation of end-states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 596–611. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.596
7.
FishbachA.FriedmanR. S.KruglanskiA. W. (2003). Leading us not into temptation: Momentary allurements elicit overriding goal activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 296–309. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.296
8.
FishbachA.TropeY. (2005). The substitutability of external control and self-control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 256–270. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.07.002
9.
FishbachA.ZhangY.TropeY. (2010). Counteractive evaluation: Asymmetric shifts in the implicit value of conflicting motivations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 29–38. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.09.008
10.
FreemanJ. B. (2014). Abrupt category shifts during real-time person perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 85–92. doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0470-8
11.
FreemanJ. B.AmbadyN. (2009). Motions of the hand expose the partial and parallel activation of stereotypes. Psychological Science, 20, 1183–1188. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02422.x
12.
FreemanJ. B.AmbadyN. (2010). MouseTracker: Software for studying real-time mental processing using a computer mouse-tracking method. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 226–241. doi:10.3758/BRM.42.1.226
13.
FreemanJ. B.AmbadyN. (2011). A dynamic interactive theory of person construal. Psychological Review, 118, 247–279. doi:10.1037/a0022327
14.
FreemanJ. B.DaleR. (2012). Assessing bimodality to detect the presence of a dual cognitive process. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 83–97. doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0225-x
15.
FreemanJ. B.DaleR.FarmerT. A. (2011). Hand in motion reveals mind in motion. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, Article 59. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00059
16.
FreitasA. L.GollwitzerP.TropeY. (2004). The influence of abstract and concrete mindsets on anticipating and guiding others’ self-regulatory efforts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 739–752. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.04.003
17.
FujitaK. (2011). On conceptualizing self-control as more than the effortful inhibition of impulses. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 352–366. doi:10.1177/1088868311411165
18.
FujitaK.TropeY.LibermanN.Levin-SagiM. (2006). Construal levels and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 351–367. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.351
19.
GallaB. M.DuckworthA. L. (2015). More than resisting temptation: Beneficial habits mediate the relationship between self-control and positive life outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 508–525. doi:10.1037/pspp0000026
20.
GillebaartM.SchneiderI. K.De RidderD. T. D. (2016). Effects of trait self-control on response conflict about healthy and unhealthy food. Journal of Personality, 84, 789–798. doi:10.1111/jopy.12219
21.
GoldJ. I.ShadlenM. N. (2001). Neural computations that underlie decisions about sensory stimuli. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 10–16. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01567-9
22.
HartiganJ. A.HartiganP. M. (1985). The dip test of unimodality. The Annals of Statistics, 13, 70–84.
23.
HayesA. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
24.
HofmannW.BaumeisterR. F.FörsterG.VohsK. D. (2012). Everyday temptations: An experience sampling study of desire, conflict, and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1318–1335. doi:10.1037/a0026545
25.
HofmannW.FrieseM.StrackF. (2009). Impulse and self-control from a dual-systems perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 162–176. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01116.x
26.
KahnemanD. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
27.
KleimanT.HassinR. R. (2011). Non-conscious goal conflicts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 521–532. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.02.007
28.
McKinstryC.DaleR.SpiveyM. J. (2008). Action dynamics reveal parallel competition in decision making. Psychological Science, 19, 22–24. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02041.x
29.
MischelW. (2014). The marshmallow test: Mastering self-control. New York, NY: Little, Brown.
30.
MuravenM.BaumeisterR. F. (2000). Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle?Psychological Bulletin, 126, 247–259. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.2.247
31.
PattonJ. H.StanfordM. S.BarrattE. S. (1995). Factor structure of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51, 768–774. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(199511)51:6<768::AID-JCLP2270510607>3.0.CO;2-1
32.
ShivB.FedorikhinA. (1999). Heart and mind in conflict: The interplay of affect and cognition in consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 278–292. doi:10.1086/209563
SpiveyM. (2008). The continuity of mind. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
35.
SticeE.SyskoR.RobertoC. A.AllisonS. (2010). Are dietary restraint scales valid measures of dietary restriction? Additional objective behavioral and biological data suggest not. Appetite, 54, 331–339. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2009.12.009
36.
SullivanN.HutchersonC.HarrisA.RangelA. (2014). Dietary self-control is related to the speed with which attributes of healthfulness and tastiness are processed. Psychological Science, 26, 122–134. doi:10.1177/0956797614559543
37.
TangneyJ. P.BaumeisterR. F.BooneA. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72, 271–324. doi:10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.x
38.
TropeY.LibermanN. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440–463. doi:10.1037/a0018963
39.
van StrienT.FrijtersJ. E. R.BergersG. P. A.DefaresP. B. (1986). The Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (DEBQ) for assessment of restrained, emotional, and external eating behavior. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 5, 295–315. doi:10.1002/1098-108X(198602)5:2<295::AID-EAT2260050209>3.0.CO;2-T
40.
WeberE. U.JohnsonE. J.MilchK. F.ChangH.BrodschollJ. C.GoldsteinD. G. (2007). Asymmetric discounting in intertemporal choice: A query-theory account. Psychological Science, 18, 516–523. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01932.x
41.
WojnowiczM. T.FergusonM. J.DaleR.SpiveyM. J. (2009). The self-organization of explicit attitudes. Psychological Science, 20, 1428–1435. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02448.x
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
