Resisting Temptation: Tracking How Self-Control Conflicts Are Successfully Resolved in Real Time

Abstract

Across four studies, we used mouse tracking to identify the dynamic, on-line cognitive processes that underlie successful self-control decisions. First, we showed that individuals display real-time conflict when choosing options consistent with their long-term goal over short-term temptations. Second, we found that individuals who are more successful at self-control—whether measured or manipulated—show significantly less real-time conflict in only self-control-relevant choices. Third, we demonstrated that successful individuals who choose a long-term goal over a short-term temptation display movements that are smooth rather than abrupt, which suggests dynamic rather than stage-based resolution of self-control conflicts. These findings have important implications for contemporary theories of self-control.

Keywords

self-control social cognition goals cognitive processes open data open materials

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ainslie

(1975). Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 463–496. doi:10.1037/h0076860

Chen

Gully

S. M.

Eden

(2001). Validation of a new General Self-Efficacy Scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 62–83. doi:10.1177/109442810141004

Cheng

González-Vallejo

(2015). Action dynamics in intertemporal choice reveal different facets of decision process. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 30, 107–122. doi:10.1002/bdm.1923

Critcher

C. R.

Ferguson

M. J.

(2016). “Whether I like it or not, it’s important”: Implicit importance of means predicts self-regulatory persistence and success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 818–839. doi:10.1037/pspa0000053

Dale

Kehoe

Spivey

M. J.

(2007). Graded motor responses in the time course of categorizing atypical exemplars. Memory & Cognition, 35, 15–28. doi:10.3758/BF03195938

Ferguson

M. J.

(2007). On the automatic evaluation of end-states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 596–611. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.596

Fishbach

Friedman

R. S.

Kruglanski

A. W.

(2003). Leading us not into temptation: Momentary allurements elicit overriding goal activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 296–309. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.2.296

Fishbach

Trope

(2005). The substitutability of external control and self-control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 256–270. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.07.002

Fishbach

Zhang

Trope

(2010). Counteractive evaluation: Asymmetric shifts in the implicit value of conflicting motivations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 29–38. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.09.008

10.

Freeman

J. B.

(2014). Abrupt category shifts during real-time person perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 85–92. doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0470-8

11.

Freeman

J. B.

Ambady

(2009). Motions of the hand expose the partial and parallel activation of stereotypes. Psychological Science, 20, 1183–1188. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02422.x

12.

Freeman

J. B.

Ambady

(2010). MouseTracker: Software for studying real-time mental processing using a computer mouse-tracking method. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 226–241. doi:10.3758/BRM.42.1.226

13.

Freeman

J. B.

Ambady

(2011). A dynamic interactive theory of person construal. Psychological Review, 118, 247–279. doi:10.1037/a0022327

14.

Freeman

J. B.

Dale

(2012). Assessing bimodality to detect the presence of a dual cognitive process. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 83–97. doi:10.3758/s13428-012-0225-x

15.

Freeman

J. B.

Dale

Farmer

T. A.

(2011). Hand in motion reveals mind in motion. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, Article 59. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00059

16.

Freitas

A. L.

Gollwitzer

Trope

(2004). The influence of abstract and concrete mindsets on anticipating and guiding others’ self-regulatory efforts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 739–752. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.04.003

17.

Fujita

(2011). On conceptualizing self-control as more than the effortful inhibition of impulses. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15, 352–366. doi:10.1177/1088868311411165

18.

Fujita

Trope

Liberman

Levin-Sagi

(2006). Construal levels and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 351–367. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.351

19.

Galla

B. M.

Duckworth

A. L.

(2015). More than resisting temptation: Beneficial habits mediate the relationship between self-control and positive life outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 508–525. doi:10.1037/pspp0000026

20.

Gillebaart

Schneider

I. K.

De Ridder

D. T. D.

(2016). Effects of trait self-control on response conflict about healthy and unhealthy food. Journal of Personality, 84, 789–798. doi:10.1111/jopy.12219

21.

Gold

J. I.

Shadlen

M. N.

(2001). Neural computations that underlie decisions about sensory stimuli. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 10–16. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01567-9

22.

Hartigan

J. A.

Hartigan

P. M.

(1985). The dip test of unimodality. The Annals of Statistics, 13, 70–84.

23.

Hayes

A. F.

(2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

24.

Hofmann

Baumeister

R. F.

Förster

Vohs

K. D.

(2012). Everyday temptations: An experience sampling study of desire, conflict, and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1318–1335. doi:10.1037/a0026545

25.

Hofmann

Friese

Strack

(2009). Impulse and self-control from a dual-systems perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 162–176. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01116.x

26.

Kahneman

(2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

27.

Kleiman

Hassin

R. R.

(2011). Non-conscious goal conflicts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 521–532. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.02.007

28.

McKinstry

Dale

Spivey

M. J.

(2008). Action dynamics reveal parallel competition in decision making. Psychological Science, 19, 22–24. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02041.x

29.

Mischel

(2014). The marshmallow test: Mastering self-control. New York, NY: Little, Brown.

30.

Muraven

Baumeister

R. F.

(2000). Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychological Bulletin, 126, 247–259. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.2.247

31.

Patton

J. H.

Stanford

M. S.

Barratt

E. S.

(1995). Factor structure of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51, 768–774. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(199511)51:6<768::AID-JCLP2270510607>3.0.CO;2-1

32.

Shiv

Fedorikhin

(1999). Heart and mind in conflict: The interplay of affect and cognition in consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 278–292. doi:10.1086/209563

33.

Simmons

J. P.

Nelson

L. D.

Simonsohn

(2012). A 21 word solution (SSRN Report No. 2160588). Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2160588

34.

Spivey

(2008). The continuity of mind. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

35.

Stice

Sysko

Roberto

C. A.

Allison

(2010). Are dietary restraint scales valid measures of dietary restriction? Additional objective behavioral and biological data suggest not. Appetite, 54, 331–339. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2009.12.009

36.

Sullivan

Hutcherson

Harris

Rangel

(2014). Dietary self-control is related to the speed with which attributes of healthfulness and tastiness are processed. Psychological Science, 26, 122–134. doi:10.1177/0956797614559543

37.

Tangney

J. P.

Baumeister

R. F.

Boone

A. L.

(2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72, 271–324. doi:10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.x

38.

Trope

Liberman

(2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117, 440–463. doi:10.1037/a0018963

39.

van Strien

Frijters

J. E. R.

Bergers

G. P. A.

Defares

P. B.

(1986). The Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (DEBQ) for assessment of restrained, emotional, and external eating behavior. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 5, 295–315. doi:10.1002/1098-108X(198602)5:2<295::AID-EAT2260050209>3.0.CO;2-T

40.

Weber

E. U.

Johnson

E. J.

Milch

K. F.

Chang

Brodscholl

J. C.

Goldstein

D. G.

(2007). Asymmetric discounting in intertemporal choice: A query-theory account. Psychological Science, 18, 516–523. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01932.x

41.

Wojnowicz

M. T.

Ferguson

M. J.

Dale

Spivey

M. J.

(2009). The self-organization of explicit attitudes. Psychological Science, 20, 1428–1435. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02448.x

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.17 MB

0.00 MB