Sharing Data and Materials in Psychological Science

American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/

Carroll M. W. (2015). Sharing research data and intellectual property law: A primer. PLoS Biology, 13(8), Article e1002235. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002235

Committee on Publication Ethics. (2013). COPE ethical guide-lines for peer reviewers. Retrieved from http://publicationethics.org/files/Peer%20review%20guidelines_0.pdf

Fecher B. Friesike S. Hebing M. (2015). What drives academic data sharing? PLoS ONE, 10(2), Article e0118053. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118053

Giofré D. Cumming G. Fresc L. Boedker I. Tressoldi P. (2017). The influence of journal submission guidelines on authors’ reporting of statistics and use of open research practices. PLoS ONE, 12(4), Article e0175583. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0175583

Guidelines for data de-identification or anonymization. (2015). Retrieved from https://spaces.internet2.edu/display/2014infosecurityguide/Guidelines+for+Data+De-Identification+or+Anonymization

Hofer S. M. Piccinin A. M. (2009). Integrative data analysis through coordination of measurement and analysis protocol across independent longitudinal studies. Psychological Methods, 14, 150–164. doi:10.1037/a0015566

Kerr N. L. (1998). HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 196–217.

Kidwell M. C. Lazarević L. B. Baranski E. Hardwicke T. E. Piechowski S. Falkenberg L.-S. . . . Nosek B. A. (2016). Badges to acknowledge open practices: A simple, low-cost, effective method for increasing transparency. PLoS Biology, 14(5), Article e1002456. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002456

Lindsay D. S. Simons D. J. Lilienfeld S. O. (2016, December). Research preregistration 101. Observer, 29, 14–16.

Morey R. D. Morey C. C. (2016, April). Habits and open science. Observer, 29, 28–29.

Nature Research. (2016). Data availability statements and data citations policy: Guidance for authors. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/authors/policies/data/data-availability-statements-data-citations.pdf

Peer Reviewers’ Openness Initiative. (n.d.). The PRO Initiative for open science. Retrieved from https://opennessinitiative.org/

Schönbrodt F. (2017). German Psychological Society fully em-braces open data, gives detailed recommendations. Retrieved from http://www.nicebread.de/open-data-recommendations/

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office for Human Research Protections. (2016). Coded private information or specimens use in research, guidance (2008). Retrieved from https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/guidance/research-involving-coded-private-information/

Vanpaemel W. Vermorgen M. Deriemaecker L. Storms G. (2015). Are we wasting a good crisis? The availability of psychological research data after the storm. Collabra: Psychology, 1, Article 3. doi:10.1525/collabra.13

van ’t Veer A. E. Giner-Sorolla R . (2016). Pre-registration in social psychology—a discussion and suggested template. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 67, 2–12. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2016.03.004

Vazire S. (2017). Quality uncertainty erodes trust in science. Collabra: Psychology, 3, Article 1. doi:10.1525/collabra.74

Wicherts J. M. Bakker M. (2012). Publish (your data) or (let the data) perish! Why not publish your data too? Intelligence, 40, 73–76. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2012.01.004

Wicherts J. M. Borsboom D. Kats J. Molenaar D. (2006). The poor availability of psychological research data for reanalysis. American Psychologist, 61, 726–728.