Increasing the Similarity of Lineup Fillers to the Suspect Improves the Applied Value of Lineups Without Improving Memory Performance: Commentary on Colloff,Wade,and Strange (2016)
Restricted accessArticle commentaryFirst published online September, 2018
Increasing the Similarity of Lineup Fillers to the Suspect Improves the Applied Value of Lineups Without Improving Memory Performance: Commentary on Colloff,Wade,and Strange (2016)
ClarkS. E. (2012). Costs and benefits of eyewitness identification reform: Psychological science and public policy. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 238–259. doi:10.1177/1745691612439584
2.
ColloffM. F.WadeK. A.StrangeD. (2016). Unfair lineups make witnesses more likely to confuse innocent and guilty suspects. Psychological Science, 27, 1227–1239. doi:10.1177/0956797616655789
3.
DuncanM. (2006). A signal detection model of compound decision tasks (Technical Report No. TR 2006-256). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Defence Research and Development Canada.
4.
LindsayR. C. L.WellsG. L. (1980). What price justice? Exploring the relationship of lineup fairness to identification accuracy. Law and Human Behavior, 4, 303–313. doi:10.1007/BF01040622
SmithA. M.WellsG. L.LindsayR. C. L.PenrodS. D. (2017). Fair lineups are better than biased lineups and showups, but not because they increase underlying discriminability. Law and Human Behavior, 41, 127–145. doi:10.1037/lhb0000219
7.
WellsG. L.SmalarzL.SmithA. M. (2015). ROC analysis of lineups does not measure underlying discriminability and has limited value. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4, 313–317. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.08.008
8.
WellsG. L.SmithA. M.SmalarzL. (2015). ROC analysis of lineups obscures information that is critical for both theoretical understanding and applied purposes. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4, 324–328. doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.08.010
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
