The promise of transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) as a modulator of cognition has appealed to researchers, media, and the general public. Researchers have suggested that tDCS may increase effects of cognitive training. In this study of 123 older adults, we examined the interactive effects of 20 sessions of anodal tDCS over the left prefrontal cortex (vs. sham tDCS) and simultaneous working memory training (vs. control training) on change in cognitive abilities. Stimulation did not modulate gains from pre- to posttest on latent factors of either trained or untrained tasks in a statistically significant manner. A supporting meta-analysis (n = 266), including younger as well as older individuals, showed that, when combined with training, tDCS was not much more effective than sham tDCS at changing working memory performance (g = 0.07, 95% confidence interval, or CI = [−0.21, 0.34]) and global cognition performance (g = −0.01, 95% CI = [−0.29, 0.26]) assessed in the absence of stimulation. These results question the general usefulness of current tDCS protocols for enhancing the effects of cognitive training on cognitive ability.
AuJ.BuschkuehlM.DuncanG. J.JaeggiS. M. (2016). There is no convincing evidence that working memory training is NOT effective: A reply to Melby-Lervåg and Hulme (2015). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 331–337. doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0967-4
3.
AuJ.KatzB.BuschkuehlM.BunarjoK.SengerT.ZabelC.. . . JonidesJ. (2016). Enhancing working memory training with transcranial direct current stimulation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28, 1419–1432. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00979
4.
AuJ.SheehanE.TsaiN.DuncanG. J.BuschkuehlM.JaeggiS. M. (2015). Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 366–377. doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0699-x
BeckerB. J. (1988). Synthesizing standardized mean-change measures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 41, 257–278.
7.
ConwayA. R. A.KovacsK. (2013). Individual differences in intelligence and working memory: A review of latent variable models. In RossB. H. (Ed.), The Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 58, pp. 233–270). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-407237-4.00007-4
8.
CreutzfeldtO. D.FrommG. H.KappH. (1962). Influence of transcortical d-c currents on cortical neuronal activity. Experimental Neurology, 5, 436–452. doi:10.1016/0014-4886(62)90056-0
9.
DayanE.CensorN.BuchE. R.SandriniM.CohenL. G. (2013). Noninvasive brain stimulation: From physiology to network dynamics and back. Nature Neuroscience, 16, 838–844. doi:10.1038/nn.3422
10.
D’EspositoM.PostleB. R.RypmaB. (2000). Prefrontal cortical contributions to working memory: Evidence from event-related fMRI studies. Experimental Brain Research, 133, 3–11. doi:10.1007/s002210000395
11.
DoughertyM. R.HamovitzT.TidwellJ. W. (2016). Reevaluating the effectiveness of n-back training on transfer through the Bayesian lens: Support for the null. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 306–316. doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0865-9
12.
DubljevicV.SaigleV.RacineE. (2014). The rising tide of tDCS in the media and academic literature. Neuron, 82, 731–736. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.05.003
13.
FariaP.HallettM.MirandaP. C. (2011). A finite element analysis of the effect of electrode area and inter-electrode distance on the spatial distribution of the current density in tDCS. Journal of Neural Engineering, 8, 066017. doi:10.1088/1741-2560/8/6/066017
14.
FertonaniA.MiniussiC. (2017). Transcranial electrical stimulation: What we know and do not know about mechanisms. The Neuroscientist, 23, 109–123. doi:10.1177/1073858416631966
15.
FritschB.ReisJ.MartinowichK.SchambraH. M.JiY.CohenL. G.LuB. (2010). Direct current stimulation promotes BDNF-dependent synaptic plasticity: Potential implications for motor learning. Neuron, 66, 198–204. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.035
16.
HarrisonT. L.ShipsteadZ.HicksK. L.HambrickD. Z.RedickT. S.EngleR. W. (2013). Working memory training may increase working memory capacity but not fluid intelligence. Psychological Science, 24, 2409–2419. doi:10.1177/0956797613492984
17.
HeiseK. F.NiehoffM.FeldheimJ. F.LiuzziG.GerloffC.HummelF. C. (2014). Differential behavioral and physiological effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy adults of younger and older age. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 6, Article 146. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2014.00146
18.
HillA. T.FitzgeraldP. B.HoyK. E. (2016). Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on working memory: A systematic review and meta-analysis of findings from healthy and neuropsychiatric populations. Brain Stimulation, 9, 197–208. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2015.10.006
19.
JonesK. T.StephensJ. A.AlamM.BiksonM.BerryhillM. E. (2015). Longitudinal neurostimulation in older adults improves working memory. PLoS ONE, 10(4), Article e0121904. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0121904
20.
KarbachJ.VerhaeghenP. (2014). Making working memory work: A meta-analysis of executive-control and working memory training in older adults. Psychological Science, 25, 2027–2037. doi:10.1177/0956797614548725
21.
KimJ. H.KimD. W.ChangW. H.KimY. H.KimK.ImC. H. (2014). Inconsistent outcomes of transcranial direct current stimulation may originate from anatomical differences among individuals: Electric field simulation using individual MRI data. Neuroscience Letters, 564, 6–10. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2014.01.054
22.
KühnS.LindenbergerU. (2016). Research on human plasticity in adulthood: A lifespan agenda. In SchaieK. W.WillisS. L. (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (8th ed., pp. 105–123). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Academic Press.
23.
LallyN.NordC. L.WalshVRoiserJ. P. (2013). Does excitatory fronto-extracerebral tDCS lead to improved working memory performance?F1000Research, 2, Article 219. doi:10.12688/f1000research.2-219.v2
24.
LooiC. Y.DutaM.BremA.-K.HuberS.NuerkH.-C.Cohen KadoshR. (2016). Combining brain stimulation and video game to promote long-term transfer of learning and cognitive enhancement. Scientific Reports, 6, Article 22003. doi:10.1038/srep22003
25.
LövdénM.BäckmanL.LindenbergerU.SchaeferS.SchmiedekF. (2010). A theoretical framework for the study of adult cognitive plasticity. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 659–676. doi:00006823-201007000-00010
26.
MalaveraA.VasquezA.FregniF. (2015). Novel methods to optimize the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation: A systematic review of transcranial direct current stimulation patents. Expert Review of Medical Devices, 12, 679–688. doi:10.1586/17434440.2015.1090308
27.
MancusoL. E.IlievaI. P.HamiltonR. H.FarahM. J. (2016). Does transcranial direct current stimulation improve healthy working memory?: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28, 1063–1089. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00956
28.
MartinD. M.LiuR.AlonzoA.GreenM.PlayerM. J.SachdevP.LooC. K. (2013). Can transcranial direct current stimulation enhance outcomes from cognitive training? A randomized controlled trial in healthy participants. The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, 16, 1927–1936.
29.
MartinsA. R. S.FregniF.SimisM.AlmeidaJ. (2017). Neuromodulation as a cognitive enhancement strategy in healthy older adults: Promises and pitfalls. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 24, 158–185. doi:10.1080/13825585.2016.1176986
30.
McArdleJ. J.NesselroadeJ. R. (1994). Using multivariate data to structure developmental change. In CohenS. H.ReeseH. W. (Eds.), Life-span developmental psychology: Methodological contributions (pp. 223–267). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
31.
Melby-LervågM.HulmeC. (2015). There is no convincing evidence that working memory training is effective: A reply to Au et al. (2014) and Karbach and Verhaeghen (2014). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 324–330. doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0862-z
32.
Melby-LervågM.RedickT. S.HulmeC. (2016). Working memory training does not improve performance on measures of intelligence or other measures of “far transfer”: Evidence from a meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 512–534. doi:10.1177/1745691616635612
33.
MeredithW.TeresiJ. A. (2006). An essay on measurement and factorial invariance. Medical Care, 44(11), 69–77. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000245438.73837.89
34.
MirandaP. C.LomarevM.HallettM. (2006). Modeling the current distribution during transcranial direct current stimulation. Clinical Neurophysiology, 117, 1623–1629. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2006.04.009
35.
MorrisS. B. (2000). Distribution of the standardized mean change effect size for meta-analysis on repeated measures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 53, 17–29.
36.
MorrisS. B. (2008). Estimating effect sizes from pretest-posttest-control group designs. Organizational Research Methods, 11, 364–386. doi:10.1177/1094428106291059
37.
NitscheM. A.FrickeK.HenschkeU.SchlitterlauA.LiebetanzD.LangN.. . . PaulusW. (2003). Pharmacological modulation of cortical excitability shifts induced by transcranial direct current stimulation in humans. The Journal of Physiology, 553, 293–301. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2003.049916
38.
NitscheM. A.PaulusW. (2001). Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology, 57, 1899–1901.
39.
NoackH.LövdénM.SchmiedekF. (2014). On the validity and generality of transfer effects in cognitive training research. Psychological Research, 78, 773–789. doi:10.1007/s00426-014-0564-6
40.
RavenJ. C. (1960). Guide to the standard progressive matrices: Sets A, B, C, D and E. London, England: H. K. Lewis.
41.
R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (Version 3.3.0). Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
42.
RichmondL. L.WolkD.CheinJ.OlsonI. R. (2014). Transcranial direct current stimulation enhances verbal working memory training performance over time and near transfer outcomes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26, 2443–2454. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00657
43.
SeibtO.BrunoniA. R.HuangY.BiksonM. (2015). The pursuit of DLPFC: Non-neuronavigated methods to target the left dorsolateral pre-frontal cortex with symmetric bicephalic transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Brain Stimulation, 8, 590–602.
44.
ShipsteadZ.RedickT. S.EngleR. W. (2012). Is working memory training effective?Psychological Bulletin, 138, 628–654. doi:10.1037/a0027473
45.
SimonsD. J.BootW. R.CharnessN.GathercoleS. E.ChabrisC. F.HambrickD. Z.Stine-MorrowE. A. L. (2016). Do “brain-training” programs work?Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17, 103–186.
46.
StaggC. J.BestJ. G.StephensonM. C.O’SheaJ.WylezinskaM.KincsesZ. T.. . . Johansen-BergH. (2009). Polarity-sensitive modulation of cortical neuro-transmitters by transcranial stimulation. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 5202–5206. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4432-08.2009
47.
SummersJ. J.KangN.CauraughJ. H. (2016). Does transcranial direct current stimulation enhance cognitive and motor functions in the ageing brain? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Research Reviews, 25, 42–54. doi:10.1016/j.arr.2015.11.004
48.
ViechtbauerW. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36(3), 1–48.
49.
WiethoffS.HamadaM.RothwellJ. C. (2014). Variability in response to transcranial direct current stimulation of the motor cortex. Brain Stimulation, 7, 468–475. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2014.02.003
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
