Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The human body navigates the environment via locomotory movements that leverage gravity and limb biomechanics to propel the body in a particular direction. This process creates a causal link between limb movements and whole-body translation. However, it is unknown whether humans use this causal relation as a constraint in perception and inference with body movements. In the present study, participants rated actions of other individuals as more natural when limb movements (as a cause) occurred before body displacements (as an effect) than when limb movements temporally lagged behind body displacements. This causal expectation for human body movements not only affected perceptual impressions regarding the naturalness of observed actions but also guided the interpretation of motion cues within a more generalized causal context. We interpret these results within a framework of causality as evidence that the constraint of causal action plays an important role in perception and inference with body movements.

Keywords

causality biological motion action causal perception open data

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abravanel

Levan-Goldschmidt

Stevenson

M. B.

(1976). Action imitation: The early phase of infancy. Child Development, 47, 1032–1044.

Bechlivanidis

Lagnado

D. A.

(2013). Does the “why” tell us the “when”? Psychological Science, 24, 1563–1572.

Bechlivanidis

Lagnado

D. A.

(2016). Time reordered: Causal perception guides the interpretation of temporal order. Cognition, 146, 58–66.

Cheng

P. W.

(1997). From covariation to causation: A causal power theory. Psychological Review, 104, 367–405.

Desantis

Haggard

(2016). Action-outcome learning and prediction shape the window of simultaneity of audiovisual outcomes. Cognition, 153, 33–42.

Heider

Simmel

(1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 57, 243–259.

Hume

(1888). Hume’s treatise of human nature ( Selby-Bigge

L. A.

, Ed.). Oxford, England: Clarendon Press. (Original work published 1739)

Chen

Holyoak

K. J.

(2012). Bayesian analogy with relational transformations. Psychological Review, 119, 617–648.

Masselink

Lappe

(2015). Translation and articulation in biological motion perception. Journal of Vision, 15(11), Article 10. doi:10.1167/15.11.10

10.

Michotte

A. E.

(1963). The perception of causality ( Miles

T. R.

Trans.). London, England: Methuen & Co. (Original work published 1946)

11.

Price

(1992). Agency and causal asymmetry. Mind, 101, 501–520.

12.

Rohde

Greiner

Ernst

M. O.

(2014). Asymmetries in visuomotor recalibration of time perception: Does causal binding distort the window of integration? Acta Psychologica, 147, 127–135.

13.

Sanborn

A. N.

Mansinghka

V. K.

Griffiths

T. L.

(2013). Reconciling intuitive physics and Newtonian mechanics for colliding objects. Psychological Review, 120, 411–437.

14.

Scholl

B. J.

Nakayama

(2002). Causal capture: Contextual effects on the perception of collision events. Psychological Science, 13, 493–498.

15.

Scholl

B. J.

Tremoulet

P. D.

(2000). Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 299–309.

16.

Shu

Thurman

Chen

Zhu

S.-C.

(2016). Critical features of joint actions that signal human interaction. In Papafragou

Grodner

Mirman

Trueswell

(Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 574–579). Retrieved from https://mindmodeling.org/cogsci2016/cogsci16/proceedings.pdf

17.

Thurman

S. M.

(2013). Physical and biological constraints govern perceived animacy of scrambled human forms. Psychological Science, 24, 1133–1141.

18.

Thurman

S. M.

(2014). Perception of social interactions for spatially scrambled biological motion. PLoS ONE, 9(11), Article e112539. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0112539

19.

Thurman

S. M.

(2016). Revisiting the importance of common body motion in human action perception. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78, 30–36.

20.

van Boxtel

J. J.

(2013). A biological motion toolbox for reading, displaying, and manipulating motion capture data in research settings. Journal of Vision, 13(12), Article 7. doi:10.1167/13.12.7

21.

Waldmann

M. R.

Holyoak

K. J.

(1992). Predictive and diagnostic learning within causal models: Asymmetries in cue competition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 222–236.

22.

White

P. A.

(1999). Toward a causal realist account of causal understanding. American Journal of Psychology, 112, 605–642.

23.

White

P. A.

(2006). The causal asymmetry. Psychological Review, 113, 132–147.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.58 MB

0.19 MB

Causal Action: A Fundamental Constraint on Perception and Inference About Body Movements

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material