Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2017-6
Strategic Resource Use for Learning: A Self-Administered Intervention That Guides Self-Reflection on Effective Resource Use Enhances Academic Performance
Many educational policies provide learners with more resources (e.g., new learning activities, study materials, or technologies), but less often do they address whether students are using these resources effectively. We hypothesized that making students more self-reflective about how they should approach their learning with the resources available to them would improve their class performance. We designed a novel Strategic Resource Use intervention that students could self-administer online and tested its effects in two cohorts of a college-level introductory statistics class. Before each exam, students randomly assigned to the treatment condition strategized about which academic resources they would use for studying, why each resource would be useful, and how they would use their resources. Students randomly assigned to the treatment condition reported being more self-reflective about their learning throughout the class, used their resources more effectively, and outperformed students in the control condition by an average of one third of a letter grade in the class.
BarkleyE. F.CrossK. P.MajorC. H. (2014). Collaborative learning techniques: A handbook for college faculty. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
2.
BembenuttyH. (2013). The triumph of homework completion through a learning academy of self-regulation. In BembenuttyH.ClearyT. J.KitsantasA. (Eds.), Applications of self-regulated learning across diverse disciplines (pp. 153–196). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
3.
BoekaertsM. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where we are today. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 445–457.
CepedaN. J.PashlerH.VulE.WixtedJ. T.RohrerD. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 354–380.
6.
CohenG. L.GarciaJ.ApfelN.MasterA. (2006). Reducing the racial achievement gap: A social-psychological intervention. Science, 313, 1307–1310.
7.
CubanL.CubanL. (2009). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
DunloskyJ.RawsonK. A.MarshE. J.NathanM. J.WillinghamD. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14, 4–58.
10.
GollwitzerP. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54, 493–503.
11.
GollwitzerP. M.BrandstätterV. (1997). Implementation intentions and effective goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 186–199.
12.
GuptaS. K. (2011). Intention-to-treat concept: A review. Perspectives in Clinical Research, 2, 109–112.
13.
HanushekE. A. (1997). Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: An update. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 141–164.
14.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.
15.
HullemanC. S.HarackiewiczJ. M. (2009). Promoting interest and performance in high school science classes. Science, 326, 1410–1412.
16.
KarabenickS. A. (2003). Seeking help in large college classes: A person-centered approach. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 37–58.
17.
KellowayE. K. (1998). Using LISERL for structural equation modeling: A researcher’s guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
KirschenbaumD. S.HumphreyL. L.MalettS. D. (1981). Specificity of planning in adult self-control: An applied investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 941–950.
19.
KlineR. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
20.
LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21.
MacKinnonD. P.LockwoodC. M.WilliamsJ. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 99–128.
22.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
23.
PapeS. J.BellC. V.Yetkin-OzdemirI. E. (2013). Sequencing components of mathematics lessons to maximize development of self-regulation: Theory, practice, and intervention. In BembenuttyH.ClearyT. J.KitsantasA. (Eds.), Applications of self-regulated learning across diverse disciplines (pp. 29–58). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
24.
PauneskuD.WaltonG. M.RomeroC.SmithE. N.YeagerD. S.DweckC. S. (2015). Mind-set interventions are a scalable treatment for academic underachievement. Psychological Science, 26, 784–793.
25.
PhamL. B.TaylorS. E. (1999). From thought to action: Effects of process-versus outcome-based mental simulations on performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 250–260.
26.
PintrichP. R.De GrootE. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40.
27.
PintrichP. R.SmithD. A. F.GarciaT.McKeachieW. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED338122
28.
PintrichP. R.SmithD. A. F.GarciaT.McKeachieW. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801–813.
29.
PlantE. A.EricssonK. A.HillL.AsbergK. (2005). Why study time does not predict grade point average across college students: Implications of deliberate practice for academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 96–116.
30.
SchumanH.WalshE.OlsonC.EtheridgeB. (1985). Effort and reward: The assumption that college grades are affected by quantity of study. Social Forces, 63, 945–966.
31.
SmithC. A.EllsworthP. C. (1987). Patterns of appraisal and emotion related to taking an exam. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 475–488.
32.
WaltonG. M. (2014). The new science of wise psychological interventions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 73–82.
33.
WaltonG. M.CohenG. L. (2011). A brief social-belonging intervention improves academic and health outcomes of minority students. Science, 331, 1447–1451.
34.
WeinsteinC. E.AceeT. W. (2013). Helping college students become more strategic and self-regulated learners. In BembenuttyH.ClearyT. J.KitsantasA. (Eds.), Applications of self-regulated learning across diverse disciplines (pp. 197–236). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
35.
WertzR. T. (1995). Intention to treat: Once randomized, always analyzed. Clinical Aphasiology, 23, 57–64.
36.
YeagerD. S.WaltonG. M. (2011). Social-psychological interventions in education: They’re not magic. Review of Educational Research, 81, 267–301.
37.
ZimmermanB. J. (2011). Motivational sources and outcomes of self-regulated learning and performance. In ZimmermanB. J.SchunkD. H. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 49–64). New York, NY: Routledge.
38.
ZimmermanB. J.Martinez-PonsM. (1988). Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 284–290.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
