BarnardG. A. (1945). A new test for 2 × 2 tables [Letter to the editor]. Nature, 156, 783–784. doi:10.1038/156783b0
2.
BarnardG. A. (1947). Significance tests for 2 × 2 tables. Biometrika, 34, 123–138. doi:10.1093/biomet/34.1-2.123
3.
BilligM. (2013). Learn to write badly: How to succeed in the social sciences. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
4.
CurranP. J.BauerD. J. (2011). The disaggregation of within-person and between-persons effects in longitudinal models of change. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 583–619. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100356
5.
HeathersJ. A. J.BrownN. J. L.CoyneJ. C.FriedmanH. L. (2015). The elusory upward spiral: A reanalysis of Kok et al. (2013). Psychological Science, 26, 1140–1143. doi:10.1177/0956797615572908
6.
KokB. E.CoffeyK. A.CohnM. A.CatalinoL. I.VacharkulksemsukT.AlgoeS. B., . . . FredricksonB. L. (2013). How positive emotions build physical health: Perceived positive social connections account for the upward spiral between positive emotions and vagal tone [with Supplemental Material]. Psychological Science, 24, 1123–1132. doi:10.1177/0956797612470827
7.
KokB. E.FredricksonB. L. (2015). Evidence for the upward spiral stands steady: A response to Heathers, Brown, Coyne, and Friedman (2015). Psychological Science, 26, 1144–1146. doi:10.1177/0956797615584304
8.
McClellandG. H. (2014). Nasty data: Unruly, ill-mannered observations can ruin your analysis. In ReisH. T.JuddC. M. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality and social psychology (2nd ed., pp. 608–626). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.