Differences in people’s beliefs can substantially impact their interpretation of a series of events. In this functional MRI study, we manipulated subjects’ beliefs, leading two groups of subjects to interpret the same narrative in different ways. We found that responses in higher-order brain areas—including the default-mode network, language areas, and subsets of the mirror neuron system—tended to be similar among people who shared the same interpretation, but different from those of people with an opposing interpretation. Furthermore, the difference in neural responses between the two groups at each moment was correlated with the magnitude of the difference in the interpretation of the narrative. This study demonstrates that brain responses to the same event tend to cluster together among people who share the same views.
AdolphsR. (2009). The social brain: Neural basis of social knowledge. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 693–716.
2.
AmesD. L.HoneyC. J.ChowM. A.TodorovA.HassonU. (2015). Contextual alignment of cognitive and neural dynamics. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27, 655–664.
3.
AndersonR. C.ReynoldsR. E.SchallertD. L.GoetzE. T. (1977). Frameworks for comprehending discourse. American Educational Research Journal, 14, 367–381.
4.
BašnákováJ.WeberK.PeterssonK. M.van BerkumJ.HagoortP. (2014). Beyond the language given: The neural correlates of inferring speaker meaning. Cerebral Cortex, 24, 2572–2578.
5.
BenjaminiY.HochbergY. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 57, 289–300.
6.
BransfordJ.JohnsonM. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 717–726.
7.
ChakroffA.DunganJ.Koster-HaleJ.BrownA.SaxeR.YoungL. (2016). When minds matter for moral judgment: Intent information is neurally encoded for harmful but not impure acts. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11, 476–484.
8.
CooperE. A.HassonU.SmallS. L. (2011). Interpretation-mediated changes in neural activity during language comprehension. NeuroImage, 55, 1314–1323.
9.
Dodell-FederD.Koster-HaleJ.BednyM.SaxeR. (2011). fMRI item analysis in a theory of mind task. NeuroImage, 55, 705–712.
10.
FerstlE. C.RinckM.von CramonD. Y. (2005). Emotional and temporal aspects of situation model processing during text comprehension: An event-related fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 724–739.
11.
FletcherP. C.HappéF.FrithU.BakerS. C.DolanR. J.FrackowiakR. S.FrithC. D. (1995). Other minds in the brain: A functional imaging study of “theory of mind” in story comprehension. Cognition, 57, 109–128.
12.
GalleseV.KeysersC.RizzolattiG. (2004). A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 396–403.
13.
GobbiniM. I.KoralekA. C.BryanR. E.MontgomeryK. J.HaxbyJ. V. (2007). Two takes on the social brain: A comparison of theory of mind tasks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1803–1814.
14.
HagoortP.HaldL.BastiaansenM.PeterssonK. M. (2004). Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science, 304, 438–441.
15.
HastorfA. H.CantrilH. (1954). They saw a game: A case study. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49, 129–134.
16.
IacoboniM.Molnar-SzakacsI.GalleseV.BuccinoG.MazziottaJ. C.RizzolattiG. (2005). Grasping the intentions of others with one’s own mirror neuron system. PLoS Biology, 3(3), Article e79. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030079
17.
JenkinsA. C.MitchellJ. P. (2010). Mentalizing under uncertainty: Dissociated neural responses to ambiguous and unambiguous mental state inferences. Cerebral Cortex, 20, 404–410.
18.
Jung-BeemanM. (2005). Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 512–518.
19.
KeysersC.GazzolaV. (2006). Towards a unifying neural theory of social cognition. Progress in Brain Research, 156, 379–401.
20.
Koster-HaleJ.SaxeR.DunganJ.YoungL. L. (2013). Decoding moral judgments from neural representations of intentions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 110, 5648–5653.
LernerY.HoneyC. J.SilbertL. J.HassonU. (2011). Topographic mapping of a hierarchy of temporal receptive windows using a narrated story. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 2906–2915.
23.
MaguireE. A.FrithC. D.MorrisR. G. (1999). The functional neuroanatomy of comprehension and memory: The importance of prior knowledge. Brain, 122(Pt. 10), 1839–1850.
24.
MarR. A. (2011). The neural bases of social cognition and story comprehension. Annual Reviews of Psychology, 62, 103–134.
25.
MarsR. B.NeubertF.-X.NoonanM. P.SalletJ.ToniI.RushworthM. F. S. (2012). On the relationship between the “default mode network” and the “social brain.”Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, Article 189. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00189
26.
Martin-LoechesM.CasadoP.Hernandez-TamamesJ. A.Alvarez-LineraJ. (2008). Brain activation in discourse comprehension: A 3t fMRI study. NeuroImage, 41, 614–622.
27.
MasonR. A.JustM. A. (2011). Differentiable cortical networks for inferences concerning people’s intentions versus physical causality. Human Brain Mapping, 32, 313–329.
28.
MontgomeryK. J.SeehermanK. R.HaxbyJ. V. (2009). The well-tempered social brain. Psychological Science, 20, 1211–1213.
29.
PelliD. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442.
30.
RanganathC.RitcheyM. (2012). Two cortical systems for memory-guided behaviour. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13, 713–726.
31.
RizzolattiG.FogassiL.GalleseV. (2001). Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 661–670.
32.
SaxeR. (2005). Against simulation: The argument from error. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 174–179.
33.
SaxeR.PowellL. J. (2006). It’s the thought that counts: Specific brain regions for one component of theory of mind. Psychological Science, 17, 692–699.
34.
SchurzM.RaduaJ.AichhornM.RichlanF.PernerJ. (2014). Fractionating theory of mind: A meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 42, 9–34.
35.
SkerryA. E.SaxeR. (2015). Neural representations of emotion are organized around abstract event features. Current Biology, 25, 1945–1954.
36.
SpuntR. P.AdolphsR. (2014). Validating the why/how contrast for functional MRI studies of theory of mind. NeuroImage, 99, 301–311.
37.
SpuntR. P.LiebermanM. D. (2012a). An integrative model of the neural systems supporting the comprehension of observed emotional behavior. NeuroImage, 59, 3050–3059.
38.
SpuntR. P.LiebermanM. D. (2012b). Dissociating modality-specific and supramodal neural systems for action understanding. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 3575–3583.
39.
St GeorgeM.KutasM.MartinezA.SerenoM. I. (1999). Semantic integration in reading: Engagement of the right hemisphere during discourse processing. Brain, 122(Pt. 7), 1317–1325.
40.
TalairachJ.TournouxP. (1988). Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain (RayportM., Trans.). New York, NY: Thieme Medical Publishers.
41.
TamirD. I.ThorntonM. A.ContrerasJ. M.MitchellJ. P. (2016). Neural evidence that three dimensions organize mental state representation: Rationality, social impact, and valence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 113, 194–199.
42.
TesinkC. M. J. Y.PeterssonK. M.van BerkumJ. J. A.van den BrinkD.BuitelaarJ. K.HagoortP. (2009). Unification of speaker and meaning in language comprehension: An fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 2085–2099.
43.
TsoiL.DunganJ.WaytzA.YoungL. (2016). Distinct neural patterns of social cognition for cooperation versus competition. NeuroImage, 137, 86–96.
44.
UchiyamaH. T.SaitoD. N.TanabeH. C.HaradaT.SekiA.OhnoK.. . . SadatoN. (2012). Distinction between the literal and intended meanings of sentences: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of metaphor and sarcasm. Cortex, 48, 563–583.
45.
Van OverwalleF.BaetensK. (2009). Understanding others’ actions and goals by mirror and mentalizing systems: A meta-analysis. NeuroImage, 48, 564–584.
46.
YarkoniT.SpeerN. K.ZacksJ. M. (2008). Neural substrates of narrative comprehension and memory. NeuroImage, 41, 1408–1425.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
