Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Laptop computers are widely prevalent in university classrooms. Although laptops are a valuable tool, they offer access to a distracting temptation: the Internet. In the study reported here, we assessed the relationship between classroom performance and actual Internet usage for academic and nonacademic purposes. Students who were enrolled in an introductory psychology course logged into a proxy server that monitored their online activity during class. Past research relied on self-report, but the current methodology objectively measured time, frequency, and browsing history of participants’ Internet usage. In addition, we assessed whether intelligence, motivation, and interest in course material could account for the relationship between Internet use and performance. Our results showed that nonacademic Internet use was common among students who brought laptops to class and was inversely related to class performance. This relationship was upheld after we accounted for motivation, interest, and intelligence. Class-related Internet use was not associated with a benefit to classroom performance.

Keywords

Internet laptop academic performance

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Babb

K. A.

Ross

(2009). The timing of online lecture slide availability and its effect on attendance, participation, and exam performance. Computers & Education, 52, 868–881.

Clayson

D. E.

Haley

D. A.

(2013). An introduction to multitasking and texting: Prevalence and impact on grades and GPA in marketing classes. Journal of Marketing Education, 35, 26–40.

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Dong

DeVito

E. E.

Cui

(2012). Impaired inhibitory control in ‘Internet addiction disorder’: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 203, 153–158.

Fried

C. B.

(2008). In-class laptop use and its effects on student learning. Computers & Education, 50, 906–914.

Gould

S. J. J.

Cox

A. L.

Brumby

D. P.

(2016). Diminished control in crowdsourcing: An investigation of crowdworker multitasking behavior. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 23(3), Article 19. doi:10.1145/2928269

Grace-Martin

Gay

(2001). Web browsing, mobile computing and academic performance. Educational Technology & Society, 4, 95–107.

Hancock

G. R.

Mueller

R. O.

(2010). The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences. New York, NY: Routledge.

Howell

D. C.

(2007). Statistical methods for psychology (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.

10.

Hume

Van Der Horst

Brug

Salmon

Oenema

(2010). Understanding the correlates of adolescents’ TV viewing: A social ecological approach. International Journal of Pediatric Obesity, 5, 161–168.

11.

Jacobsen

W. C.

Forste

(2011). The wired generation: Academic and social outcomes of electronic media use among university students. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 275–280.

12.

Junco

(2012). In-class multitasking and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 2236–2243.

13.

Kirschner

P. A.

Karpinski

A. C.

(2010). Facebook and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1237–1245.

14.

Koenig

K. A.

Frey

M. C.

Detterman

D. K.

(2008). ACT and general cognitive ability. Intelligence, 36, 153–160.

15.

Kraushaar

J. M.

Novak

D. C.

(2010). Examining the affects [sic] of student multitasking with laptops during the lecture. Journal of Information Systems Education, 21, 241–251.

16.

Kvavik

R. B.

(2005). Convenience, communications, and control: How students use technology. In Oblinger

Oblinger

J. L.

Lippincott

J. K.

(Eds.), Educating the net generation (pp. 7.1–7.20). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.brockport.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1278&context=bookshelf

17.

Mark

Gonzalez

V. M.

Harris

(2005). No task left behind? Examining the nature of fragmented work. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 321–330). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.

18.

Mark

Iqbal

S. T.

Czerwinski

Johns

(2014). Bored Mondays and focused afternoons: The rhythm of attention and online activity in the workplace. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3025–3034). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.

19.

Meinz

E. J.

Hambrick

D. Z.

(2010). Deliberate practice is necessary but not sufficient to explain individual differences in piano sight-reading skill: The role of working memory capacity. Psychological Science, 21, 914–919.

20.

Michigan State University. (2015). Guidelines & policies: MSU computer requirement. Retrieved from https://tech.msu.edu/about/guidelines-policies/computer-requirement/

21.

Mueller

P. A.

Oppenheimer

D. M.

(2014). The pen is mightier than the keyboard: Advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychological Science, 25, 1159–1168.

22.

Ravizza

S. M.

Hambrick

D. Z.

Fenn

K. M.

(2014). Non-academic Internet use in the classroom is negatively related to classroom learning regardless of intellectual ability. Computers & Education, 78, 109–114.

23.

Risko

E. F.

Buchanan

Medimorec

Kingstone

(2013). Everyday attention: Mind wandering and computer use during lectures. Computers & Education, 68, 275–283.

24.

Rosen

L. D.

Lim

A. F.

Carrier

L. M.

Cheever

N. A.

(2011). An empirical examination of the educational impact of text message-induced task switching in the classroom: Educational implications and strategies to enhance learning. Psicologia Educativa, 17, 163–177.

25.

Samson

P. J.

(2010). Deliberate engagement of laptops in large lecture classes to improve attentiveness and engagement. Computers in Education, 20(2), 22–37.

26.

Sana

Weston

Cepeda

N. J.

(2013). Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers. Computers & Education, 62, 24–31.

27.

Tindell

D. R.

Bohlander

R. W.

(2012). The use and abuse of cell phones and text messaging in the classroom: A survey of college students. College Teaching, 60, 1–9.

28.

Turel

Xue

Xiao

Bechara

(2014). Examination of neural systems sub-serving Facebook “addiction.” Psychological Reports: Disability & Trauma, 115, 675–695.

29.

Wilmer

H. H.

Chein

J. M.

(2016). Mobile technology habits: Patterns of association among device usage, intertemporal preference, impulse control, and reward sensitivity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 1607–1614.

30.

Wood

Zivcakova

Gentile

Archer

De Pasquale

Nosko

(2012). Examining the impact of off-task multi-tasking with technology on real-time classroom learning. Computers & Education, 58, 365–374.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.18 MB