When participants search for a target letter while reading for comprehension, they miss more instances if the target letter is embedded in frequent function words than in less frequent content words. This phenomenon, called the missing-letter effect, has been considered a window on the cognitive mechanisms involved in the visual processing of written language. In the present study, one group of participants read two texts for comprehension while searching for a target letter, and another group listened to a narration of the same two texts while listening for the target letter’s corresponding phoneme. The ubiquitous missing-letter effect was replicated and extended to a missing-phoneme effect. Item-based correlations between the reading and listening tasks were high, which led us to conclude that both tasks involve cognitive processes that reading and listening have in common and that both processes are rooted in psycholinguistically driven allocation of attention.
AngeleB.LaishleyA. E.RaynerK.LiversedgeS. P. (2014). The effect of high- and low-frequency previews and sentential fit on word skipping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 1181–1203. doi:10.1037/a0036396
2.
AngeleB.RaynerK. (2013). Processing the in the parafovea: Are articles skipped automatically?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 649–662. doi:10.1037/a0029294
3.
AssinkE. H.KnuijtP. A. (2000). Reading development and attention to letters in words. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 347–362. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1010
4.
BaayenR. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
5.
CarpenterP. A.JustM. A. (1983). What your eyes do while your mind is reading. In RaynerK. (Ed.), Eye movements in reading: Perceptual and language processes (pp. 275–307). New York, NY: Academic Press.
6.
ConnineC. M.TitoneD. (1996). Phoneme monitoring. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11, 635–645. doi:10.1080/016909696387042
7.
CorcoranD. W. J. (1966). An acoustic factor in letter cancellation. Nature, 210, 658.
8.
CunninghamT. F.HealyA. F.KanengiserN.ChizzickL.WillittsR. L. (1988). Investigating the boundaries of reading units across ages and reading levels. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 45, 175–208. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(88)90029-X
9.
DrewnowskiA. (1981). Missing -ing in reading: Developmental changes in reading units. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 31, 154–168. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(81)90009-6
10.
DriegheD.RaynerK.PollatsekA. (2005). Eye movements and word skipping during reading revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 954–969. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.31.5.954
11.
FossD. J. (1969). Decision processes during sentence comprehension: Effects of lexical item difficulty and position upon decision times. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 457–462. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(69)80089-7
12.
GautierV.O’ReganJ. K.Le GargassonJ. F. (2000). “The-skipping” revisited in French: Programming saccades to skip the article “les.”Vision Research, 40, 2517–2531. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00089-4
13.
GreenbergS. N.HealyA. F.KoriatA.KreinerH. (2004). The GO model: A reconsideration of the role of structural units in guiding and organizing text on line. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 428–433. doi:10.3758/BF03196590
14.
GreenbergS. N.InhoffA. W.WegerU. W. (2006). The impact of letter detection on eye movement patterns during reading: Reconsidering lexical analysis in connected text as a function of task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 987–995. doi:10.1080/17470210600654776
15.
GreenbergS. N.TaiJ. (2001). Letter detection in very familiar texts. Memory & Cognition, 29, 1088–1095. doi:10.3758/BF03206377
16.
GuérardK.Saint-AubinJ.PoirierM.DemetriouC. (2012). Assessing the influence of letter position in reading normal and transposed texts using a letter detection task. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 227–238. doi:10.1037/a0028494
17.
HadleyJ. A.HealyA. F. (1991). When are reading units larger than the letter? Refinement of the unitization reading model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 1062–1073. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.17.6.1062
18.
HealyA. F. (1994). Letter detection: A window to unitization and other cognitive processes in reading text. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 333–344. doi:10.3758/BF03213975
19.
HealyA. F.OliverW. L.McNamaraT. P. (1987). Detecting letters in continuous text: Effects of display size. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 279–290. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.13.2.279
20.
KleinR. M.LawrenceM. A. (2011). The modes and domains of attention. InPosnerM. I. (Ed.), Cognitive neuroscience of attention (2nd ed., pp. 11–28). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
21.
KleinR. M.Saint-AubinJ. (in press). What a simple letter detection task can tell us about cognitive processes in reading.Current Directions in Psychological Science.
22.
KoriatA.GreenbergS. N. (1991). Syntactic control of letter detection: Evidence from English and Hebrew nonwords. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 1035–1050. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.17.6.1035
23.
KoriatA.GreenbergS. N. (1994). The extraction of phrase structure during reading: Evidence from letter detection errors. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 345–356. doi:10.3758/BF03213976
24.
MinkoffS. R. B.RaneyG. E. (2000). Letter-detection errors in the word the: Word frequency versus syntactic structure. Scientific Studies of Reading, 4, 55–76. doi:10.1207/S1532799XSSR0401_5
25.
MoravcsikJ. E.HealyA. F. (1995). Effect of meaning on letter detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 82–95. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.1.82
26.
NewB.PallierC.BrysbaertM.FerrandL. (2004). Lexique 2: A new French lexical database. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 516–524. doi:10.3758/BF03195598
27.
O’ReganK. (1979). Saccade size control in reading: Evidence for the linguistic control hypothesis. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 501–509. doi:10.3758/BF03213829
28.
ReadJ. D. (1983). Detection of Fs in a single statement: The role of phonetic recoding. Memory & Cognition, 11, 390–399. doi:10.3758/BF03202454
29.
Roy-CharlandA.Saint-AubinJ. (2006). The interaction of word frequency and word class: A test of the GO model’s account of the missing-letter effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 38–45. doi:10.1080/17470210500269428
30.
Roy-CharlandA.Saint-AubinJ.KleinR. M.LawrenceM. (2007). Eye movements as direct tests of the GO model for the missing-letter effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 324–337. doi:10.3758/BF03193753
31.
Saint-AubinJ.KennyS.Roy-CharlandA. (2010). The role of eye movements in the missing-letter effect revisited with the rapid serial visual presentation procedure. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 47–52. doi:10.1037/a0016850
32.
Saint-AubinJ.KleinR. M. (2001). Influence of parafoveal processing on the missing-letter effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 318–334. doi:10.1037//0096-1523.27.2.318
33.
Saint-AubinJ.KleinR. M. (2008). The influence of reading skills on the missing-letter effect among elementary school students. Reading Research Quarterly, 43, 132–146. doi:10.1598/RRQ.43.2.2
34.
Saint-AubinJ.KleinR. M.LandryT. (2005). Age chances in the missing-letter effect revisited. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 91, 158–182. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2005.01.007
35.
Saint-AubinJ.KleinR. M.Roy-CharlandA. (2003). Direct assessments of the processing time hypothesis for the missing-letter effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 1191–1210. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.29.6.1191
36.
Saint-AubinJ.PoirierM. (1997). The influence of word function in the missing-letter effect: Further evidence from French. Memory & Cognition, 25, 666–676. doi:10.3758/BF03211308
37.
Saint-AubinJ.Roy-CharlandA.KleinR. M. (2007). The influence of multiple readings on the missing-letter effect revisited. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1578–1587. doi:10.3758/BF03193492
38.
SchneiderV. I.HealyA. F.EricssonK. A.BourneL. E. (1989). Letter detection errors in reading, auditory, and memory tasks. Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 400–411. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(89)90019-3
39.
SchneiderV. I.HealyA. F.GesiA. (1991). The role of phonetic processes in letter detection: A reevaluation. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 294–318. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(91)90038-L
40.
SymondsM. R. R.MoussalliA. (2011). A brief guide to model selection, multimodel inference and model averaging in behavioural ecology using Akaike’s information criterion. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 65, 13–21. doi:10.1007/s00265-010-1037-6
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
