Growing evidence suggests that interpersonal responsiveness—feeling understood, validated, and cared for by other people—plays a key role in shaping the quality of one’s social interactions and relationships. But what enables people to be interpersonally responsive to others? In the current study, we argued that responsiveness requires not only accurate understanding but also compassionate motivation. Specifically, we hypothesized that understanding another person’s thoughts and feelings (empathic accuracy) would foster responsive behavior only when paired with benevolent motivation (empathic concern). To test this idea, we asked couples (N = 91) to discuss a personal or relationship stressor; we then assessed empathic accuracy, empathic concern, and responsive behavior. As predicted, when listeners’ empathic concern was high, empathic accuracy facilitated responsiveness; but when empathic concern was low, empathic accuracy was unhelpful (and possibly harmful) for responsiveness. These findings provide the first evidence that cognitive and affective forms of empathy work together to facilitate responsive behavior.
BatsonC. D. (1991). The altruism question: Toward a social-psychological answer. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2.
BatsonC. D. (2009). These things called empathy: Eight related but distinct phenomena. In DecetyJ.IckesW. (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 3–15). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3.
BatsonC. D.EarlyS.SalvaraniG. (1997). Perspective taking: Imagining how another feels versus imaging how you would feel. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 751–758.
4.
CanevelloA.CrockerJ. (2010). Creating good relationships: Responsiveness, relationship quality, and interpersonal goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 78–106.
5.
CollinsN. L.FeeneyB. C. (2000). A safe haven: An attachment theory perspective on support seeking and caregiving in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1053–1073.
6.
CollinsN. L.FordM.GuichardA.KaneH. S.FeeneyB. C. (2010). Responding to need in intimate relationships: Social support and caregiving processes in couples. In MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (Eds.), Prosocial motives, emotions, and behavior: The better angels of our nature (pp. 367–388). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
7.
CollinsN. L.KaneH. S.MetzM. A.ClevelandC.KhanC.WinczewskiL.. . . ProkT. (2014). Psychological, physiological, and behavioral responses to a partner in need: The role of compassionate love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 31, 601–629.
8.
CrockerJ.CanevelloA. (2008). Creating and undermining social support in communal relationships: The role of compassionate and self-image goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 555–575.
9.
DavisM. H.KrausL. A. (1997). Personality and empathic accuracy. In IckesW. J. (Ed.), Empathic accuracy (pp. 144–168). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
10.
DecetyJ.IckesW. (Eds.). (2009). The social neuroscience of empathy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11.
DuncanS.FiskeD. W. (1979). Dynamic patterning in conversation: Language, paralinguistic sounds, intonation, facial expressions, and gestures combine to form the detailed structure and strategy of face-to-face interactions. American Scientist, 67, 90–98.
12.
FeeneyB. C.CollinsN. L. (2003). Motivations for caregiving in adult intimate relationships: Influences on caregiving behavior and relationship functioning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 950–968.
13.
FeeneyB. C.CollinsN. L. (2015). A new look at social support: A theoretical perspective on thriving through relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19, 113–147. doi:10.1177/1088868314544222
14.
ForestA. L.KilleD. R.WoodJ. V.HolmesJ. G. (2014). Discount and disengage: How chronic negative expressivity undermines partner responsiveness to negative disclosures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 1013–1032.
15.
GableS. L.GosnellC. L.MaiselN. C.StrachmanA. (2012). Safely testing the alarm: Close others’ responses to personal positive events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 963–982.
16.
GalinskyA. D.MoskowitzG. B. (2000). Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 708–724.
17.
GilinD.MadduxW. W.CarpenterJ.GalinskyA. D. (2013). When to use your head and when to use your heart: The differential value of perspective-taking versus empathy in competitive interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 3–16.
18.
HendrickS. S. (1988). A generic measure of relationship satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 93–98.
19.
IckesW. (1993). Empathic accuracy. Journal of Personality, 61, 587–610.
20.
IckesW. (Ed.). (1997). Empathic accuracy. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
21.
IckesW. (in press). Empathic accuracy: Judging thoughts and feelings. In HallJ. A.Schmid MastM.WestT. (Eds.), The social psychology of perceiving others accurately. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
22.
IckesW.BuysseA.PhamH.RiversK.EricksonJ. R.HancockM.. . . GesnP. R. (2000). On the difficulty of distinguishing “good” and “poor” perceivers: A social relations analysis of empathic accuracy data. Personal Relationships, 7, 219–234.
23.
IckesW.GesnP. R.GrahamT. (2000). Gender differences in empathic accuracy: Differential ability or differential motivation?Personal Relationships, 7, 95–109.
24.
IckesW.RobertsonE.TookeW.TengG. (1986). Naturalistic social cognition: Methodology, assessment, and validation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 66–82.
25.
IckesW.StinsonL.BissonnetteV.GarciaS. (1990). Naturalistic social cognition: Empathic accuracy in mixed-sex dyads. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 730–742.
26.
KilpatrickS. D.BissonnetteV. L.RusbultC. E. (2002). Empathic accuracy and accommodative behavior among newly married couples. Personal Relationships, 9, 369–393.
27.
KlineR. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
28.
LaurenceauJ.-P.BarrettL. F.RovineM. J. (2005). The interpersonal process model of intimacy in marriage: A daily-diary and multilevel modeling approach. Journal of Family Psychology, 19, 314–323.
29.
MaiselN. C.GableS. L. (2009). The paradox of received social support: The importance of responsiveness. Psychological Science, 20, 928–932.
30.
MaiselN. C.GableS. L.StrachmanA. (2008). Responsive behaviors in good times and in bad. Personal Relationships, 15, 317–338.
31.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
32.
ReisH. T. (2006). The Perceived Responsiveness to Self scale. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Clinical and Social Sciences in Psychology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.
33.
ReisH. T. (2014). Responsiveness: Affective interdependence in close relationships. In MikulincerM.ShaverP. R. (Eds.), Mechanisms of social connection: From brain to group (pp. 255–271). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
34.
ReisH. T.ClarkM. S. (2013). Responsiveness. In SimpsonJ. A.CampbellL. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 400–423). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
35.
ReisH. T.ClarkM. S.HolmesJ. G. (2004). Perceived partner responsiveness as an organizing construct in the study of intimacy and closeness. In MashekD. J.AronA. P. (Eds.), Handbook of closeness and intimacy (pp. 201–225). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
36.
ReisH. T.GableS. L. (2015). Responsiveness. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 67–71.
37.
ReisH. T.PatrickB. C. (1996). Attachment and intimacy: Component processes. In KruglanskiA.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 523–563). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
38.
ReisH. T.ShaverP. (1988). Intimacy as an interpersonal process. In DuckS. (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships (pp. 367–389). Chichester, England: Wiley.
39.
SillarsA. L. (1985). Interpersonal perception in relationships. In IckesW. (Ed.), Compatible and incompatible relationships (pp. 277–305). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
40.
SimpsonJ. A.IckesW.BlackstoneT. (1995). When the head protects the heart: Empathic accuracy in dating relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 629–641.
41.
SimpsonJ. A.KimJ. S.FilloJ.IckesW.RholesW. S.OriñaM. M.WinterheldH. A. (2011). Attachment and the management of empathic accuracy in relationship-threatening situations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 242–254.
42.
SimpsonJ. A.OriñaM. M.IckesW. (2003). When accuracy hurts, and when it helps: A test of the empathic accuracy model in marital interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 881–893.
43.
SprecherS.FehrB. (2005). Compassionate love for close others and humanity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 629–651.
44.
StinsonL.IckesW. (1992). Empathic accuracy in the interactions of male friends versus male strangers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 787–797.
45.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
46.
VerhofstadtL. L.BuysseA.IckesW.DavisM.DevoldreI. (2008). Support provision in marriage: The role of emotional similarity and empathic accuracy. Emotion, 8, 792–802.
47.
ZakiJ.BolgerN.OchsnerK. (2008). It takes two: The interpersonal nature of empathic accuracy. Psychological Science, 19, 399–404.
48.
ZakiJ.WeberJ.BolgerN.OchsnerK. (2009). The neural bases of empathic accuracy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106, 11382–11387.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
